Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

#1, #1 and #14

Recs

24

November 21, 2008 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: SKF , SRS , GLD

I am on vacation and shopping for Christmas gifts. I have missed a lot of this week’s market activity. I was surprised to see abitarePERFECT was Top Fool, yesterday morning. I did watch part of the Congressional Testimony while running on the treadmill. Watching these corrupt liars talk on CNBC is enough to make me want to get even more leveraged short. These paid lying narcissists babbling about finding ways to “help” are a big part of the continued sell off, IMO.  

 

abitarePERFECT is #1 (Clean Bear and pursues the accuracy Fool goes crazy for)

abitare is #1 in points (a point chaser)

abitarecatania on updown.com is #14 out 104K,  YTD is 333.36%

 

I am spending time with my family, so I cannot commit any real time to the market this week. I think it might surprise, some Fools, that I would be vacationing and shopping considering the market and the uncertain future of the US and its’ economy.  I have been a mostly Bearish over a year. So the market sells off and Bear market is not news to me. The severity and speed have surprised everyone. But investors have access to the internet and near immediate ability to react to news as it influences the market. The news is bad and worse then most expected. It is not news to Fool community. The Top Fools are mostly Bears to varying degrees. SPECBEAR has been in and out of #1 almost my entire time here on Fool.

 

Most of the Top Bloggers are Bears too, so IMO, Fool is an outstanding tool for investors to have made the right choices.

 

On the Market

 

Yesterday, I sold my SKF. SKF was 50% of my holdings. So now I am 50% cash and need to find new employment for cash. I am still 50% leveraged short, of companies I expect to get hit further.

 

On many of my Posts I used SKF, SRS and GLD as the ticker reference. These WERE my favorite positions for Fools.

 

On 17 Sep 08 I wrote:

 

Proud to Be Long SKF (Ultra Short Financials)

You can read it here or Google Proud to Be Long SKF (Ultra Short Financials):

http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=87956&t=01007146184382914537

 

I think there is the real possibility to make big money here in the market. abitarePERFECT had a record LOW of 60 to 80  groupies when he became Top Fool, which tells me there is a real shock, that “Joe Plumber” type investors are not expecting or adjusting the current circumstance.  

 

I will leave you with an alternative Bear view from James Kunstler:

 In the Reality Lounge    

The G-20 came to Washington for the weekend and sucked all the air out of the city before announcing that they were really serious about patching all the leaks in the foundering ship of globalism. Well, they have to at least pretend that they are doing something. Meanwhile, the former bit player known as reality has taken center stage in the ship's main lounge. It is putting on an act even gnarlier than the Kit Kat Klub show in Cabaret.    

This reality show is sending some clear signals to the denizens of the real and really crowded world. The main signal is that the trade and financing rackets of recent decades are over. The extravaganza of economic hypergrowth based on cheap resources is over. The promiscuous swapping around of risk and rewards is over. There is no global institutional framework for managing the impairment left in the wake of this binge. It will be up to the individual nations now to figure out their national lives and livings.    

 Alas, the financial impairment is still on-going world-wide and has quite a ways to run before it's finished working its hoodoo on the so-called advanced economies. The lame duck US economic posse so far has done everything possible except the two things that really matter: allow the fraudulent securities at the heart of the problem to be exposed to the light of day to determine their actual value; and allow those companies who trafficked in them to suffer the full consequences by going out-of-business. For the moment, they're content to shovel cash into the truck-bed of every enterprise in America that shows up at the Treasury loading dock. This can only have the effect of eventually destroying the value of that cash.     

President-elect Obama's cagey appearance on 60-Minutes showed that he's hardly in a position to say anything of substance about this country's predicament as long as the old posse holds the levers of the economic machinery -- and retains the ability to run it into the ground before January 20, 2009. So many tribulations are now underway in our Republic that it is hard to fathom what the head of the federal government might do besides act as a kind of psychological counselo-in-chief to a land full of people in distress.    

The world has changed faster than anyone realizes. One big question is how long the American people will stumble around in a daze before we get back to work doing constructive things in this country -- and by that I mean activities scaled to the resource realities of the years just ahead. More specifically, I mean how we are going to grow the food we eat without massive quantities of diesel fuel and petroleum-based "inputs" and also how we are going to make any of the useful products we need in an energy scarcer time.     

Perhaps Mr. Obama knows that we're not going back to anything even close to the business-as-usual that shaped our lives for the generations born after 1945. I would advise him to begin thinking about this by dividing the problem into two parts. The first part is how his government might handle the sheer emotional fallout of a people whose standard-of-living will be pulled out from under them. For a while, perhaps the first year or so, the public is apt to be trusting and generous, especially regarding a president who has had some acquaintance with being short of cash himself, and who can speak English both clearly and empathetically. Mr. Obama stands a good chance at playing that role successfully, at least for a while.     

The second part, though, is the more difficult operational and administrative matter of promoting the necessary downscaling of all the essential activities of daily life. This is especially difficult given the current trend of the government suddenly taking ownership of everything, from the banking system perhaps to certain areas of heavy industry (if Detroit gets its way). The Obama government will have to resist the temptation to prevent enterprises from failing. These failing things have to get out of the way before new activities can get underway. It will also require government leaders to tell the public the hard truth that it can't do everything we would like it to do.   

The fiasco of medical care is certainly a product of connivance between greedy and heartless insurance companies, profit-driven hospitals, and avaricious drug-makers. But the public itself is responsible for its own suicidal diet of double cheez burritos and Dr. Pepper. How about a national health-care system with one basic requirement: to qualify, participants must be within ten pounds of their appropriate weight. Pretty harsh, huh? Maybe. But times are harsh too, and bound to get harsher. This system would have the great advantage of being absolutely clear. Let the United Way and other charities devote their resources to educating the recklessly obese about diet and exercise so they can eventually qualify.    

 The transportation quandary suggests that we have to move away from the private automobile and commercial trucking, and that the airline industry is certain to contract dramatically. When are we going to start the discussion about rebuilding a US public transit system that was once the envy of the world? It no longer matters how much Americans love their cars, or even how much investment we've made in car infrastructure. At some point, we just have to face the fact that democratic mass motoring is no longer on the program. Nor is a commercial economy based on incessant motoring. One other implication of this is the necessity to use our waterways for moving things and people again. Has anybody noticed, for instance, that the once-bustling New York City Harbor, possibly the biggest and best sheltered deepwater harbor in the world, has next-to-zero operating docks left along its massive perimeter? While you're at it, have a look at the waterfronts of Louisville, Cincinnati, Kansas City and a score of other inland port cities on great navigable rivers. What you'll see are condo sites, festival marketplaces, picnic grounds, and plain old empty lots -- everything but the infrastructure for commerce. We can't afford this anymore. We have to put these places back to work.    

 The G-20 leaders in Washington last week made a lot of noise about ramping up domestic spending. In the decades to come, this will not happen without import replacement -- which is just what it sounds like: instead of importing things you need, you make them at home, and people get paid a living wage to do it. Import replacement, by the way, is exactly how the United States rose in the 19th century to become the world's preeminent manufacturing nation. It doesn't foreclose trade with other countries, but it self-evidently changes the terms of that trade, and it would spell the end of the kind of predatory "globalism" that has led to the current state of gross imbalance and reckless destruction.     

I believe this will happen whether we like it or not, because these things occur in cycles and the current cycle is obviously ending with a thundering crash of economies, modes of operation, habits and practices, and expectations. For better or worse, we have to move on to new ways of doing things.

      I regard the most dangerous fantasy in America right now to be the wish that we can keep running things just the way they are now (my recurring synecdoche of WalMart, Walt Disney World, and the interstate highway system) by replacing oil and gas with "alternative fuels." This just ain't gonna happen. We're going to use every kind of alt.energy there is and they will still require us to live very differently than we did the past sixty years. The public just doesn't get this. I don't know whether President-elect Obama gets this. I hope he does, and I hope part of his new mission will be to clarify this state of affairs for the public in clear and effective speech. It's going to tick off a lot of them, but it's the theme music playing in the reality lounge right now, and Mr. Obama would be advised to take up the tune.

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 21, 2008 at 11:40 AM, thepull (99.58) wrote:

Thumbs up on this post.

It also avoided the frothing at the mouth about Obama that a lot of people tend to get into here.

Well done.

Report this comment
#2) On November 21, 2008 at 12:23 PM, ikkyu2 (99.51) wrote:

Congrats on hitting Top Fool.  And not pestering my blog with Ron Paul comments for over 3 months :)

What does abitare mean, anyway?  Is it your name?  I remember the old name of what is now AresFinancial but I don't want to type it here in case you're trying to get your name off the intertubes.

Report this comment
#3) On November 21, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Tastylunch (29.93) wrote:

Well nothing left to say but congrats and good luck.

I want to personally thank you for helping save my family's money this year. If it weren't for you, Dwot and Everydayinvestor asn some others, I probably wouldn't have had the courage to sell most of my family's holdings in december and the rest here in september.Thanks in part to your posts I was able to convince my entire family to sell in september.

I suppose if you are vacationing abroad there's always the option to just stay there if need be. If Citigroup goes down I'd consider it if I were in your shoes. Unfortunately for me I'm more tied to my physical location due to my business than most, so I'm likely going down with the ship should we sink.

Report this comment
#4) On November 21, 2008 at 12:28 PM, BigFatBEAR (30.08) wrote:

Congrats on your foresight, success, and on being able to buy christmas presents. ;)

One correction: although Specbear is obviously very bearish, I believe he said that the name was a nickname, unrelated to his market stance. 

I also noticed that you are a Ron Paul supporter. I think that the CAPS community recognized that Mr. Obama, as a reformist, is a lot more in tune with reality than Mr. Bush ever has been. Here's hoping Obama can work with reformists of differing views (like Ron Paul) to bring some sanity back to our government and economy. Hell, if I were Obama, I'd offer Ron Paul a place in my administration!

Report this comment
#5) On November 27, 2008 at 10:20 PM, abitare (99.44) wrote:

ALCON,

Thank you for the replies and support.

thepull,

I am have great hope for Obama. I hope he does not let me down. But I think the circumstances are beyond his control.

Tastylunch 

I am glad that I helped. Other have helped me also, I though I was a lonely bear, until I came here. My family is here, I will like stay here, too.

I think Citigroup will hopefully, find bigger and better targets.

BigFatBEAR.

Thank you. I think you are right on SPECBEAR. I think they need Ron Paul. I do not think Ron Paul need the grief.

I am very much a Ron Paul supporter. I hope for the best with Obama. But I think he is on the wrong path already. Take a gander at Jim Rogers on CNBC 26 Nov 08 

 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement