2014 ROE Champion List
Greeting Fools, and welcome to my big post of the year!
It is time to unveil my 2nd annual Return on Equity Champions List.
You can find last year’s edition here: http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/a-fortune-article-from-1988-is/824762
CAPs user Teacherman went to the trouble of creating a CAPs profile just to follow the businesses that passed my screen last year. The profile is teacherman333, and the profile soundly beat the market last year.
Check it out here: http://caps.fool.com/player/teacherman333.aspx Thanks again, Teacherman!
The inspiration for this original screen list can be found in the 1987 Berkshire Hathaway Letter, see excerpt below:
"Here's a benchmark: In its 1988 Investor's Guide issue, Fortune reported that among the 500 largest industrial companies and 500 largest service companies, only six had averaged a return on equity of over 30% during the previous decade. The best performer among the 1000 was Commerce Clearing House at 40.2%.
Experience, however, indicates that the best business returns are usually achieved by companies that are doing something quite similar today to what they were doing five or ten years ago. That is no argument for managerial complacency. Businesses always have opportunities to improve service, product lines, manufacturing techniques, and the like, and obviously these opportunities should be seized. But a business that constantly encounters major change also encounters many chances for major error. Furthermore, economic terrain that is forever shifting violently is ground on which it is difficult to build a fortress-like business franchise. Such a franchise is usually the key to sustained high returns.
The Fortune study I mentioned earlier supports our view. Only 25 of the 1,000 companies met two tests of economic excellence - an average return on equity of over 20% in the ten years, 1977 through 1986, and no year worse than 15%. These business superstars were also stock market superstars: During the decade, 24 of the 25 outperformed the S&P 500. The Fortune champs may surprise you in two respects. First, most use very little leverage compared to their interest-paying capacity. Really good businesses usually don't need to borrow. Second, except for one company that is "high-tech" and several others that manufacture ethical drugs, the companies are in businesses that, on balance, seem rather mundane. Most sell non- sexy products or services in much the same manner as they did ten years ago (though in larger quantities now, or at higher prices, or both). The record of these 25 companies confirms that making the most of an already strong business franchise, or concentrating on a single winning business theme, is what usually produces exceptional economics." - (1987 Berkshire Hathaway Letter)
Inspired by that excerpt, every year, I conduct a modern day re-creation of that same study, by going page-by-page, through all the companies that Value Line covers. I screened by hand for companies with: 1) a 10 year average ROE over 20%, AND 2) Zero years in the past decade with a ROE below 15%.
Just 145 out of 1705 companies (or 8.5%) passed both of these two hurdles from 2004-2013.
Those 145 companies on this year’s list are:
AAP, ACN, ADP, AMX, AMGN, APH, APOL, ATK, BAX, BCR, BDX, BF.B, BLL, BOH, BTI, CAT, CEB, CHRW, CI, CL, COH, COKE, COL, CPA, CPB, CPSI, CSCO, CTSH, DCI, DD, DE, DECK, DLTR, DRI, DST, DVA, EAT, EFX, EL, EMN, EMR, ENR, ESI, EV, FAST, FDO, FDS, FII, FMC, GGG, GILD, GIS, GPS, GRMN, GSK, HD, HIBB, HRB, HSY, IBM, IDXX, IFF, IGT, IMO, INFY, INTU, IT, JBHT, JCOM, JNJ, JOY, JWN, K, KMB, KMP, KO, KR, LDR, LH, LXK, LLTC, LLY, LMT, MA, MAT, MCD, MDT, MHFI, MIDD, MKC, MLHR, MMM, MMP, MNST, MRK, MSFT, MTD, NDSN, NKE, NSR, NUS, NVO, OMC, ORCL, PAYX, PBI, PEP, PETM, PETS, PII, POOL, PX, PZZA, ROK, ROL, ROST, SAP, SBUX, SCCO, SEIC, SHW, SLGN, STJ, STRA, SYK, SYY, TECH, TEN, THI, TJX, TROW, TSCO, TSM, TTC, TUP, UL, UPS, UTX, VAR, WAT, WDC, WMT, WEX, WU, YUM
92.8% of last year’s ROE Champions were Champions again this year. Here are the 7.2% that either failed to pass one of our two tests of economic strength, or were de-listed in 2013: ABT, AVP, AZN, FRX, JW.A, UNH, QSII all failed to pass at least one of our two tests of economic strength. CEC was acquired, and taken private.
Miscellaneous adjustment : McGraw Hill’s (old ticker MHP) successor company is now listed under the ticker MHFI after selling its education unit, and remains on the Champion list.
Last year, I promised you that there would be errors/omissions in my research – and I kept my word.
I completely missed at least 8 companies that should have been on last year’s list. They have been added to the “new” list, which also contains both new ROE champs for this year, and a couple that were not covered in Value Line last year. Finally, I have decided to be a bit more liberal with allowing a few immensely profitable companies with negative equity (thus do not pass the ROE test) but have been nonetheless insanely profitable over the past 10 years, if you analyze ROA, ROIC, etc. (WU for example)
Those “new” Champions are listed below: (roughly half are truly new champions, the other half were either omitted by accident, or omitted due to the negative equity adjustment to the rules that I made are: AMX, AMGN, APOL, BOH, CSCO, CI, COKE, CPA, CEB, DECK, EMN, EFX, FMC, IT, JBHT, IDXX, INTU, ESI, JOY, KMP, LLTC, MMP, MA, MRK, VIVO, MLHR, NSR, NDSN, JWN, PETM, PBI, TROW, ROK, SCCO, SBUX, STRA, TSM, TEN, THI, TSM, TSCO, UTX, WU, WEX
I’d like to highlight another woeful error on my part - in last year’s edition - I tried to do a crude back test on the ROE Champions, to test what your returns would have been if you bought them all 10 years ago, and held them.The results of that crude back-test *seemed* very good, but I later realized they were HEAVILY distorted by survivor bias. Only companies that were still public could be evaluated in google finance. This means that all those that went private, were acquired, went bankrupt, etc, were not included. That basically made my results completely and utterly invalid – so if you read last year’s post, please ignore the back-test.
Lastly, just for fun – Here are the companies’ that will reach the 10th consecutive year of 15%+ ROE/10 yr AVG >20%, if they perform well in 2014, and would likely qualify for next year’s list:AAPL, NILE, BA, BKE, CE, CBRL, FTI, GWW, GES, HLF, HON, OI, RAI, TEF, TXN
If you’ve made it this far, thanks for reading.
For those interested in my research, I have something new to add this year.
Though, I am not really a big fan of mechanical investing, I try to keep an open mind. I’ve always considered Greenblatt’s Magic Formula interesting, but somewhat inadequate. As a result, I have created my own experiment that follows a similar line of thinking, but is hopefully a slight improvement. There are two significant weaknesses in Greenblatt’s Formula, in my view. (The formula calls for a mechanical portfolio of businesses with high ROIC, and low EV/EBIT multiple.)
Weakness #1 is that only the most recent years ROIC is used. I truly believe that consistency of quality is key. By that I mean 40% ROTC last year is great, but if your 5 or 10 year average ROIC is below 10%, than I don’t want to invest there. My solution is to substitute Greenblatt’s trailing ROIC number with my ROE Champion list, which demands very consistent, high profitability, over the long-term.
Weakness #2 is that instead of a plain vanilla valuation multiple, which does not take future growth into account, I will I will replace Greenblatt’s EV/EBIT multiple with Value Line’s projected 3-5 yr total annualized return. Though this is certainly NOT a perfect metric, which I think is a better indicator of future returns than a blind PE or EV/EBIT multiple. For extra conservatism, I will rank stocks by the lower bound (for those familiar) of Value Line’s 3-5 total annualized return projection.
To test my hypothesis, I have created a brand new, Motley Fool CAPs player with the username MagicROEchamps. http://caps.fool.com/player/magicroechamps.aspx
This portfolio will consist of the top 20 stocks on my ROE Champion list, that have the highest lower-bound Value Line 3-5 year total annualized projection. (Again, for those not familiar with Value Line, this number can be thought of as Value Line’s minimum 3-5 year projected forward rate of total return.)
I will rebalance the portfolio on the first trading day of each month.
Should be a very interesting experiment!
Thanks so much for reading, and please add some feedback to these ideas, as well as point out any errors or mistakes I made.