Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

reddingrunner (< 20)

Recs

2

Why stocks are currently underpriced...

November 23, 2009 – Comments (2) | RELATED TICKERS: AAPL , HDB , BRF

The S&P 500 increased almost straight line by just under 10% per year from 1950 until just before the crash one year ago.  Project that increase and the S&P should be at 2000 sometime next year (currently approx 1100).  [more]

Recs

3

Health Care Sector: LT winner

June 05, 2008 – Comments (1)

The health care sector had a great run until a few years ago.  As always, the speculators pushed the prices up too high too fast and we've had a correction the last few years.    [more]

Recs

2

Apple: The end is near!!! (or not)

June 03, 2008 – Comments (4) | RELATED TICKERS: AAPL

The title of David Gaffen's post in the WSJ is "The end of Apple's Golden Age?".  I checked it out since I believe Apple's Golden Age is just beginning.  The day is coming when the Mac operating system will be as dominant as Windows is/ has been.    [more]

Recs

0

Only 12%

June 02, 2008 – Comments (2)

Only 12% of the CAPS community have positive scores (i.e., are beating the S&P 500 so far).

I can think of a few guys who would have predicted this. 

Recs

0

Bubble? What bubble?

May 28, 2008 – Comments (2) | RELATED TICKERS: FCX , PBR , RIG

A bubble is not defined by a rapid rise in prices, a bubble is defined- or, more accurately, can be identified by- a rapid and unsustainable rise in the P/E ratio.  The P/E's of tech stocks in 1999 were obviously unsustainable- even if they continued to grow fast, the prices would have to have stayed flat for a long time just to bring the P/E's back to realistic valuations.  And, in fact, the prices dropped and sales continued to grow and today tech stocks are realistically valued for the most part- but if you bought in 1998 you haven't made much money in the last decade even if your company's sales have tripled- the growth was already (over-)priced into it when you bought it.  [more]

Featured Broker Partners