Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

AllStarPortfolio (65.75)

Bridgeboy0 picks Jamba for AllStarPortfolio

Recs

9

October 14, 2009 – Comments (12) | RELATED TICKERS: JMBA

His pitch

http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=264536&t=01003120767258779834

 

 

http://caps.fool.com/player/bridgeboy0.aspx

 

I just hit the pitch, so it will take 20 minutes to rec his pitch on JMBA

12 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM, AllStarPortfolio (65.75) wrote:

Oh, and we are in first place for the week at wallstreetsurvivor

http://www.wallstreetsurvivor.com/Public/Content/MSN/Rankings/AllStarPortfolio.aspx

 

Hey, Portefeuille, are you still holding FACT to 19?

-solaris

Report this comment
#2) On October 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, portefeuille (99.96) wrote:

hi Solaris.

could you start EMC as my "new second pick" in the allstarportfolio FACT (the limit to end the FACT call of $18.00 has been reached)?

The pitch.

------------------------------------
EMC Corporation

Our second largest investment is our stake in EMC. We invested in EMC because of the high
quality nature of the company’s two principal business lines – the Information Infrastructure and
Virtual Infrastructure businesses – and our ability to acquire a position at a substantial discount
to our estimate of fair value.
Each of EMC’s Information Infrastructure’s three segments – Information Storage, Content
Management and Archiving, and RSA Information Security – leads the market in which it
competes. Because of the extremely high compound growth rate in data globally – estimated by
industry experts at 60+% per annum; (think saved YouTube videos and regulatory requirements
to preserve documents and data), we believe that demand for data storage over the long-term is
largely insensitive to the economy. As a result, we expect that EMC’s dominant market position
in Information Infrastructure will continue to allow it to generate growing, and predictable free
cash flow from new product sales, recurring maintenance and warranty revenues, and the sale of
consumables. The company also benefits because of its substantial operating leverage from
economies of scale, large barriers to entry, and economies of scope, where the breadth of the
company’s product offering is a significant competitive advantage.
EMC’s customers are diverse by industry and geography and enjoy efficiencies from
concentrating their infrastructure spending on a small number of market leading vendors such as
EMC. Its customers are also highly risk averse, as data storage is a critically important function
for regulatory and competitive reasons, and customers face significant costs if they switch to an
alternative vendor.
Information Infrastructure enjoys the benefits of both the inherent operating leverage of the
software business with the high switching costs of the hardware business. Because EMC’s
Information Infrastructure hardware is built from the assembly of components manufactured by
multiple, highly competitive, third-party suppliers, EMC does not suffer the inventory risk,
capital intensity, and supplier negotiating power of traditional hardware businesses.
EMC’s off-balance sheet assets include a large base of satisfied customers that are receptive to
additional offerings from EMC, and a sales force that is considered by many to be the best in the
information technology industry. Combined, these assets facilitate EMC’s expansion into
adjacent markets.
The rapid adoption of virtualization and cloud computing led by EMC’s 84% owned, publicly
traded VMware subsidiary – we are rapidly moving to a world in which you will simply rent
your computing power and storage from third parties and you will no longer have that noisy,
heat-generating, power-consuming box under your desk – increases the demand for EMC’s
offerings, while improving EMC’s opportunity to differentiate its offerings and maintain its
pricing.
VMware is driving a transformation of the information technology industry, and in that process
we expect it will capture large profits over time. We believe that the VMware can ultimately
enjoy a market position and economics similar to that enjoyed by Microsoft’s Windows x86
server and desktop operating system.
We attribute EMC’s substantial stock price appreciation in recent weeks to the market’s
recognition of a recently completed strategic acquisition, better-than-expected second quarter
operating performance, and the continued business progress of VMware.
We believe that EMC is undervalued on a sum-of-the-parts basis, and that the value of its two
core operating segments will continue to increase at an attractive rate.

(from here: Pershing Square Q2 2009 Investor Letter)

------------------------------------ 

Report this comment
#3) On October 14, 2009 at 1:39 PM, portefeuille (99.96) wrote:

oh, was it $19.00? Then please simply end the FACT call now. no limit needed for FACT and EMC.

Report this comment
#4) On October 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, SolarisKing (27.44) wrote:

Got it.

-solaris

Report this comment
#5) On October 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, bridgeboy0 (99.96) wrote:

You gave it a red-thumb instead of a green.  You may want to contact Motley Fool about getting that fixed.

Report this comment
#6) On October 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, 100ozRound (99.96) wrote:

You gave it a red-thumb instead of a green.  You may want to contact Motley Fool about getting that fixed.

 

And get the "Yes Man" charm back!

Report this comment
#7) On October 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM, portefeuille (99.96) wrote:

well, the wrong call is "in the green" nicely so far ...

Report this comment
#8) On October 14, 2009 at 4:35 PM, caidencollett07 (99.45) wrote:

CPBY got the first double!

Report this comment
#9) On October 14, 2009 at 10:06 PM, SolarisKing (27.44) wrote:

How did i do that? I feel so silly. This is not the first time i've had to have jake fix my mistake.

I hope he can do it again. I would rather have the yes man charm than 4 points.

Let me get on it.

-solaris

CONGRATULATIONS Caidencollett07 on your double bag.

Oh, btw, HEY, i said we are in first place for the week at WSS!

Report this comment
#10) On October 15, 2009 at 12:27 AM, AllStarPortfolio (65.75) wrote:

Portefuille. Your WSS account:

 

$2,129.90                  FACT

$   824.82                 SQNM

 

$2,954.72                  TOTAL

 

. . . . . for you to do with as you'd like. 

Want me to leave SQNM alone, and put the 2,100 on EMC? (holding SQNM for CAPS accuracy, and capital retention?)

Oh, and you didn't give me a time frame. I think i picked one year. Mind the rules young man.

-solaris

Report this comment
#11) On October 15, 2009 at 1:38 AM, portefeuille (99.96) wrote:

Can you put $1000 into EMC, $500 into SQNM (thus increasing that position) and keep the rest (ca. $629.90) in FACT? I hope having 3 positions is okay as long as we don't have that many participants.

Report this comment
#12) On October 15, 2009 at 1:53 AM, portefeuille (99.96) wrote:

So please "sell" 85 FACT shares, "buy" 55 EMC shares and "add" 150 SQNM shares. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners