Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

ferrariedgardo (97.92)

Why I think OCNF is a huge opportunity currently trading at distress prices

Recs

6

October 26, 2009 – Comments (11) | RELATED TICKERS: OCNF

OCNF (Disclosure: I have a significant position in this stock and all the statements here are based on my own analysis based on publicly available information)

For the last few weeks I have been trying to understand the valuation of OCNF and yet, I do not find enough reasons for its current valuation.

Today OCNF has reached $1.03 which represents a market cap of $93 million and which translates in a decline of more than 37% since the beginning of August and more than 40% form the last two months high.

I am still trying to understand the reasons for this decline but I only find some short term issues that may explain the decline of the stock.

Here are some of the questions I asked myself  in order of relevance:

1. Is the company going bankrupt?  No, at least that is what it’s cash position suggests, in the last quarter the company had 104 million in cash and considering that its revenue from last quarter was 32 million it seems like pretty substantial cushion as it is more than three times the quarterly revenue. To have an idea of how well this is we can compare this to companies that are the gold standard for having large sums of cash the first is MSFT June 30 th statements cash and short term investments:  $31 bn.  Quarterly revenue: $58bn. Cash and short term investments are around half a quarter of revenues , the second example is Goog June 30 th statements cash and short term investments:  $16 bn.  Quarterly revenue: $21 bn.  Cash and short term investments are less than 0.6 times quarterly revenues

2. What about debt? Because the industry invests in very high fixed depreciating assets the industry tends to have huge amounts of debt yet when comparing OCNF with other companies in the industry it seems its debt levels are within acceptable levels for the  industry averages but considering that most of the revenue of the company is secured by contracts their predictability of cashflows is better than for other companies and thus it can handle higher levels of debt. D/E  OCNF =0.92 PRGN= 0.90, DRYS= 1.19, ESEA = 0.29, Industry average = 0.74, Sector = 1.36

3. How is the company doing? Last quarter OCNF presented a significant loss of $32.8M or 0.51 cents per share. However most of this loss $ 30M was due to the sale of two old ships at a lower price than book value, yet at the same time OCNF bought two much newer ships at also very low values which ensures future revenues for the company. When looking in more details on the operations a slightly los utilization of below 90% can be noted but this is likely to increase as some contracts were locked in during these months. Additionally when looking at EBITDA the company generated $8.6 M or around $0.10 per share. When comparing the EBIT to interest it also looks healthy with a EBIT to interest ratio of 2 which considering the freight rates are very low it looks quite healthy.

4. What are the perspectives going forward? With the industry utilization declining freight rates will suffer pressure and revenue will go down. OCNF because of its long term contracts has a significant hedge to this downturn. However many of the competitors are struggling and not finding ways to cover for operating costs. With this and given the strong balance sheet and cash position OCNF can seize to buy newer ships at distressed prices and rent them at low rates for a couple of years but once the industry comes to balance again the prices of ships will quadruple and the rates might do even better. Thus buying ships now is the right thing to do.

5. What will happen in the industry going forward? Overcapacity will hurt the industry in the next year but the scrap tonnage of around 70 million dwt and a reduction in placed orders of 100 m dwt will allow freight rates to recover in 2011. At the same time it is important to remember that OCNF utilization will be very close to 100% due to its smart long term contract policy. Looking at the long run some dry bulk shipping companies will collapse leaving space to others like OCNF grow thus this is the moment to buy the stock. At current prices where the stock trades below the value of its cash and I expect it to generate positive cashflow it is the time to buy 

6. What about the stock issuance for 400 M? In past presentations it was mentioned that OCNF is looking to issue shares worth 400 M  to buy 10 additional panamaxes. However the number of panamaxes seems low if we consider that  the industry finances a significant portion of each ship. Other than that I estimate that the ROIC of buying a ship at current prices would result in a ROIC of around 17 to 25% if the ship is financed with 60% debt and bought for 25M. Thus if a new emission is made above $1 it is very likely that the issuance is going to be accretive. 

For these reasons I think OCNF is priced well below it’s potential and may increase several times in value in the next year. And by the way the earnings release is expected to come out next week at current prices I think that even a very bad quarter cannot hurt the stock anymore.

 

Please let me know your thoughts, comments, objections, etc.

11 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 27, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mary953 (24.46) wrote:

Have not examined the stock yet, but I always appreciate a well thought out discussion on a company.  +1 and following with interest.

Report this comment
#2) On October 27, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Tastylunch (99.53) wrote:

OCNF is run by a 31 year old guy who is related financially and by blood to the scumbags who run dryships

http://www.forbes.com/global/2008/0310/032.html?partner=yahoomag

To me it's  a value trap. There are far better shippers out there with more trustwrthy management if you really want to be in the sector.

I think that's the real reason it's going down despite the apparent value on the balance sheet. No one trusts the company.

Report this comment
#3) On October 27, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Nemie (< 20) wrote:


 Thanks for the info with regard to that kind of trade.  I have been exposed to similar kind of trade, the agent told me that   it will  earn a lot, yes certainly it will provide high return  BUT the risk was , if the economy isn’t stable definitely your investment will be affected too, the stocks are volatile, as a sort of advice if you want to be engage in any other trade just familiarize  how to leverage the investment. Diversify the fund to avoid probable loss since the market isn’t yet stable. It may be worth to have a installment loans to have a complete assessment whether it is wise to engaged in that kind of trade.

Report this comment
#4) On October 27, 2009 at 8:47 AM, SkinneeJ (75.37) wrote:

I've been wondering the same thing and actually thought about starting a blog on it yesterday.  I'm also thinking about increasing my position as I first got in at 1.30.  It seems to be headed pretty close to it's all time low at 0.80.  Yet, they seem to be adding ships to their fleet, etc.  I would think that if they had a bleak outlook on the future that they would be scaling back, yet it seems that they are trying to grow.

My only question is how many shares were added since this stock was trading around the $30 mark?  Was a significant part of this decline due to share dillution?

Report this comment
#5) On October 27, 2009 at 11:05 AM, ferrariedgardo (97.92) wrote:

Thanks for the comments please let me elaborate:

Tastylunch, should have addressed that as well. I have studied the company in detail and I do not see big issues of alarm. The CEO is young yes, but he comes from a tradition of shipping and has significant business eductation. Regarding their moral quality, I did read al those articles but those are mainly targeted to mr. Economou. What could be arguable is the fact of the stock issuance but that I think has already been price in, and the stock is trading at its last quarter cash position. I do not think they want to issue shres at current prices.

Skinneej, they Issued around 72 M shares to raise 116M in cash. These shares of course have been changing hands a lot and still have not found long term hands. Their float was 18M prior to that. Yet at these prices I would doubt they would like to issue new shares. After the financial reports maangement would be allowed to buy shares and we may see prices go up then. 

Report this comment
#6) On October 27, 2009 at 11:42 AM, SkinneeJ (75.37) wrote:

I hope so.  I just bought some more today.  Good luck to you guys with your holdings!

Report this comment
#7) On October 28, 2009 at 10:27 AM, MikeVor (< 20) wrote:

While I appreciate your analysis of OCNF, I think there are some issues in your point # 1.  You compare quarterly data for OCNF with quarterly data from MSFT and GOOG.  However, the revenue data you offer up for MSFT and GOOG is ANNUAL revenue, not quarterly.  So, it's not apples to apples.  Yes, cash on hand is important, as well as on-going debt.  But, I'd be digging a bit deeper and looking into how OCNF uses cash from operations, as well as cash on hand.  It appears that OCNF does have positive operating cash flow (OCF).  And yes, the point was made about the family links with DRYS.  In today's world of greed that does concern me somewhat.  I'm still deciding on whether to take a position at this point. 

Report this comment
#8) On October 28, 2009 at 3:59 PM, ferrariedgardo (97.92) wrote:

MikeVor, Yes, thanks for pointing that out on number 1, my serious bad. Although the numbers change significantly, I believe the point is still the same, lot's of cash, no problem to pay debt.

Since I wrote the blog, it has come down 14% more. At this point I hope they don't get a hostile take over bid.

 Earnings is in the next couple of weeks and I hope it shows some good numbers.

 

Report this comment
#9) On October 30, 2009 at 3:52 AM, BuffaloMarket (61.14) wrote:

I just wanted to add that the Forbes article about Mr. Economou was a total smear and was based on pure lies. He is a very independent man and I am guessing some real scumbag over at the retard day center called Forbes got in an argument with him or something.

 

The company had enormous growth before this engineered bust occurred so once the scum at goldman sachs decides to pump up the market again this stock will soar. 

Report this comment
#10) On October 31, 2009 at 9:08 PM, imacg5 (< 20) wrote:

 MSFT and GOOG didn't have to sell 100 million shares of stock in order to end up with $104 million in cash at the end of the quarter. Really, when you see cash from financing activities, or revenue from "Amortization" then don't get too excited about their prospects.

  Why would anyone make a hostile bid for this company? The cost of the company would be much more than the value of the ships, and you don't get any management with the company. They'll be better off buying ships.

  Having other shipping companies go bankrupt will not help OCNF. It doesn't reduce competition, because the ships from the BK company will be sold and continue working, the fleet remains oversupplied.

 A fleet utilization of 100% is not a big deal, it is a reflection of how many of the companies ships are in dry dock, or otherwise  idled. Most companies are between 95% and 100% no matter how much trouble they are in financially. 

 And George Economou deserves every bit of bad press he gets. He has stolen money from DRYS and funneled it to Cardiff over the last year. So consider the fact that Cardiff gets a commission for every ship bought or sold, or chartered by OCNF, and George owns 75% of Cardiff and Chrissoulas Kandylidis owns 25% of Cardiff, and she is Anthony's mother.  If Anthony can't manage twelve ships, and save those fees for OCNF shareholders then what is his use?

There are many companies incorporated by George to serve the needs of Cardiff, and this is looking like another one, using the liquidity provided by publicly traded companies to pay Cardiff for overinflated ships and high commissions. 

 Why would you assume an increase in earnings? The Lansing was sold and thats $24,000 less per day. The Topeka charter failed, and the new charter is $5,000 less per day. The Richmond charter failed, and the new charter is $11,000 less per day.  

Report this comment
#11) On November 01, 2009 at 2:56 AM, ferrariedgardo (97.92) wrote:

Thanks again for the insightful comments and critique.On the cash side, I agree it is better to generate it but still there are two advantages to having cash in this environment first it is a matter of endurance the more cash you have relative to your cash outflows the better chances of survival and second if you have cash in an environment of really low prices then you can take advantage of that (imagine if you had 100% of your assets in cash in March while the stock exchange was in the lows).Also, I should have explained the hostile bid better, if you have 104M in cash and you are generating positive cashflow (let´s say 10M a year) and your market cap is 89M would you agree you would be in the position to get a hostile takeover from outside?As I mentioned in the other comment, I think that other companies going bankrupt first will pressure vessels prices down as repossessed ships will go on auction at even lower prices and therefore create significant opportunities for cash rich companies. Regarding fleet utilization, 100% is not great by itself when you don´t have oversupply, but in this market there is oversupply thus not all companies will have very high utilization.I am aware of the relationship between Economou and Kandylidis and the whole Cardiff affaire and that is a stain on OCNF but you have to consider that there are limits to discrtionality and it is not as if they can do whatever they want, there are laws and regulations that can limit that discretionality.Regarding the earnings, it is true that they sold the Lansig, but that was already included in the previous quarter and other ships have replaced the ones sold. Regarding new time charters that is the biggest threat , they will continue to decrease  during next year but they had positive EBITDA last quarter and I believe that some of the new acquisitions will earn higher daily rates than the ones they would get for their older ships which will partially compensate some revenue lost.

 

Report this comment

Blog Archive

2009
October (2)

Featured Broker Partners