Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

brickcityman (< 20)

A modest proposal

Recs

4

November 19, 2010 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: AU , DIT , FED

To:  Ron Paul, et.al.

Subject: "Ending" the Fed

 

Dear Sirs and Madams,

 

Many teeth have been gnashed, and veins bulged, regarding the role the Federal Reserve has played in our liquidity based "healing" of the banking sector and economy at large.  At many junctures I've heard calls to "end" the federal reserve board, or at the very least audit its books.  More often than not these calls have been ignored by all but a small core group of people...  Whether it be by virtue of dis-interest or dis-agreement your tactics appear to be failing or at least still lacking in traction.

 

May I offer you a simpler solution...  One that has a proven track record. 

 

You see, while Mr. Bernanke and company highlight their mandated independence to fend off calls for oversight they are arming you with all the ammunition you require.  All you need to do is pose a question to the American people...  Why should an independent organization be immunized from paying taxes on profits it makes from the purchase and sale of investment assets?  While the fed's authority to create and destroy currency is certainly a stickey wicket, their participation in bond sales should hardly be.  Once you've gotten momentum behind "Tax the Fed" then it seems a short skip and a jump before you can get all the data you want or need.

 

Humbly Submitted,

 

- BCM

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, chk999 (99.99) wrote:

What happens to profits that the Fed makes?

When you find the answer to this you'll see why this makes no sense. 

Report this comment
#2) On November 19, 2010 at 3:09 PM, brickcityman (< 20) wrote:

Why what makes no sense?  Taxing them or the whole asset purchasing thing in the first place?

 

Honestly the small amount of research I have done didn't really address what happens to the profits.  One is left to assume that they can either plow it into QEx, "destroy it", or I dunno... Take a  vacation...

Report this comment
#3) On November 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM, chk999 (99.99) wrote:

Nope. Profits are turned over to the treasury.

Report this comment
#4) On November 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, PhulishMortal (< 20) wrote:

You know, bcm, your link is the second time in a few days I have read something about Jackson Hole.  This is the other: One bad dude

 

 

Report this comment
#5) On November 19, 2010 at 3:42 PM, brickcityman (< 20) wrote:

@ chk999

 

Nope. Profits are turned over to the treasury.

 

Great!  Then they've already consented to 100% tax.

 

But, how can we be sure that they aren't "printing" profits without having them file statements of transactions?  ...  

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement