Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Altair, Maxim, and Marcial

Recs

4

March 09, 2007 – Comments (4)

In another piece today, I noted that the "Inside Wall Street" column in BusinessWeek had recently tipped readers to consider perennial money-burner Altair Nanotechnologies (Nasdaq: ALTI).

 

I noted that Gene Marcial had noted "buy" recommendations from a couple of analysts. One of the analysts in question was Mark Harding, of one "Maxim Group." What Marcial's column did not note was that Maxim Group has done investment banking for Altair -- serving as a placement agent for a February 2005 offering and receiving a quarter of a million warrants for its trouble. (Filing here.)

 

Better yet -- and by better, I mean worse -- "Maxim Partners" is fixing to unload those same 250,000 shares, according to this January 2007 registration filing. By the way, there's no doubt that Maxim Group and Maxim Partners are basically the same entity. Although the Altair registration statement glosses over the relationship as one of an "affiliate," this SEC filing has the whole truth: Maxim Partners owns 94% of Maxim Group.

 

Why is this a problem? Well, the cynics out there might contend that it's a teensy bit self serving for one arm of a firm to put a "buy" on a stock when another arm is preparing to unload its holdings.

 

It's also a problem because Marcial's disclosure reads: "Unless otherwise noted, neither the sources cited in Inside Wall Street nor their firms hold positions in the stocks under discussion. Similarly, they have no investment banking or other financial relationships with them."

 

Oops. Wrong on several counts, it seems.

 

I'm sure Gene will want to correct the record here. He might even want to hit the SEC website once in a while and try a keyword search to verify the stories he's parroting. Yeah, reading filings isn't as easy or as fun as chit-chatting with analysts, but it's a lot better for readers to know the whole truth.

 

At the time of publication, Seth Jayson had no positions in any company mentioned here. View his stock holdings and Fool profile here. Fool rules are here.

4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On March 09, 2007 at 3:50 PM, cheekitlim (< 20) wrote:

Try harder man, how about your short positions?

Report this comment
#2) On March 09, 2007 at 7:22 PM, TMFBent (99.81) wrote:

Are you accusing me of lying in my disclosure, where it clearly states I have no position? If so, please be brave enough to make the claim, and back it up with evidence.

Report this comment
#3) On March 11, 2007 at 3:28 PM, imagesone (< 20) wrote:

rant.......

hype.....

rant.....

hype...

Report this comment
#4) On March 12, 2007 at 2:51 AM, jakool (< 20) wrote:

#1) On March 09, 2007 at 3:50 PM, cheekitlim wrote: Try harder man, how about your short positions?

 

I double that…

 

I don’t read Motley fool’s articles at all, but every single bad comment on ALTI comes from these guys down here and all the articles I have read by them about ALTI are nothing but nonsense…even if this dude doesn’t hold any short positions on this stock the motley fools members as a whole probably hold a short position on this thing man.

 

Overall this is a great stock people; I don’t own it at this point in time, waiting for it to hit that $4 mark again to jump in. This stock has great innovations taking place and the battery is big here. This stock is worth $7-8 as of this day…Get ready for it to fly…

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement