AMZN in 2013 reminds me of MSFT in 1999
I just can’t find a way to rationalize AMZN at today’s prices.
Perhaps, I’m not as smart or experienced as the AMZN bulls, but I think current earnings and profits DO matter. Only time will tell of course, and I might eat these words later, but…
I’m expecting those who buy AMZN at today’s prices to experience a return similar to those who bought MSFT at the end of 1999. Both companies we’re thought to be beyond traditional valuation. In the late 1990s, tech investors were making fun of those “old fashioned” investors who still believed in antiquated terms like “earnings” and “cash flow.”
If you bought MSFT on Dec 31, 1999 at the split adjusted price of $29.18, you paid about 74x earnings. Since 1999, MSFT has grown EPS grow by over 500%, but the share price was recently $27.94. That’s a 12 year annualized return of -0.36%. MSFT has been “growing into” its valuation for over 12 years. That’s what happens when you pay too much.
Here’s a decent article that I think illustrates MSFT’s “lost decade” pretty well: http://seekingalpha.com/article/227011-after-a-lost-decade-is-microsoft-a-buy
Let’s fast forward to 1/28/13.
There is a new “revolutionary” company to which people proclaim that the standard rules of business analysis and valuation don’t apply. Of course, it’s AMZN, which now has a PE over 3000. (MSFT’s PE was 74.)
Let’s say you wanted to buy AMZN at 283.51(Last Friday’s price) and expect at least a 10% annualized return over the next 10 years. For a 10% annualized return in 2023, you would need AMZN’s share price to rise from $283.51 to $735.
Now, let’s assume AMZN has a 2023 P/E of 50. That’s about as high a P/E as anyone can justify, in my opinion.
For AMZN to have that $735 share price and 50 PE in 2023, AMZN would require EPS of $14.70. AMZN currently has EPS of $1.37, per Morningstar. This means they would need to grow earnings by 1072% over the next 10 years AND have a P/E of at least 50 (or greater).
I’m not an expert, but it seems awfully difficult to find a way to arrange those two variables, EPS and PE, in any realistic way over the next 5-10 years, that will justify current prices. It seems like extraordinary speculation at best, with ZERO margin of safety. It’s the type of investment that Ben Graham would say has been "paid in full and perhaps overpaid for the expected prosperity."Well respected CAPs member and AMZN bull, portefeuille
, says “In a few years AMZN and WMT will have revenues of about the same size, with AMZN having "higher profit margin", so the "undervalued" stock is AMZN, I think ...”
He could certainly be correct, as he often is, but WMT has 464B in sales compared to just 57B for AMZN. And WMT’s mkt cap is 234B and for AMZN’s is 118B. So WMT has 8x the sales of AMZN and at just 2x the mkt cap. AMZN may end up with sales greater than Wal-Mart...someday… but when?
Even if WMT’s sales growth rate is zero, it would still take AMZN over 6 years at an insane 40% annualized sales growth rate to eclipse Wal-Mart in sales. And that’s if everything goes right for AMZN, and everything goes wrong for WMT. More likely it’ll be 8 or more years.
So basically, AMZN everything needs to go just about perfectly over the next 3, 5, and 10 years. How often does near-perfection happen? Very rarely! Remember friends, you pay a HEFTY price for a rosy consensus. That was the case in 1999, and in my opinion, the case for AMZN in 2013.
I believe it was Sir John Templeton who said the most dangerous words in investing are “This time it’s different.”In the case of AMZN 2013 vs MSFT 1999, this time ISN’T that different. (In my opinion)
Thanks for reading,
p.s. If you are interested in AMZN at these levels please, PLEASE reply with your reasoning, and/or assumptions for AMZN’s future growth and valuation, in a way that makes for a market-beating annualized return going forward. Thanks!
ps.ps. Idk why the formatting came out wierd. If you're a tech guy, and you know why, please let me know!