Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Anna Schwartz vs Paulson



October 19, 2008 – Comments (2)

Market ticker has a worth reading post featuring Anna Schwartz, an economist that actually lived through the depression.

Certainly Karl Denninger gives a strong case for assigning responsiblity for the mess:

"Chairman Bernanke was on The Federal Reserve Board during the Greenspan years, when Alan Greenspan "pumped liquidity" after 9/11 and the Tech Wreck, yet at the same time removed essentially all regulation and oversight from the banking sector.  He is thus complicit in the generation of the credit bubble that led to this disaster, and to take strong action against the perpetrators of same he would both have to admit that he in fact was one of the prime causative factors in the mess and would be forced to resign in disgrace.

Secretary Paulson is in an even worse situation - he, as Chairman of Goldman Sachs, testified in Congress as far back as the year 2000 that Investment Banks should have the shackles of leverage restraint removed from them.  He failed to get that from Arthur Levitt in 2000 (President Clinton's chair of the SEC) but came back to the well in 2004 under President Bush and was successful.  Two years later, having used that expansion of leverage to garner a personal fortune of $500 million dollars, he cashed out tax-free to take his seat as Treasury Secretary.

Every one of the large firms that has failed - all five (Fannie, Freddie, AIG, Lehman and Bear Stearns) - would still be in operation today if their leverage had been held at the pre-2004 12:1 limit.  Therefore, Secretary Paulson must accept personal responsibility for the decisions that led to the failure of these firms, as he was one of the primary individuals in American Business who argued for removal of these constraints."

I think it is a good post...


2 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, gman444 (28.20) wrote:

This is very relevent, but very old news indeed, dwot.  The question for investors is as it has always been the timing of the fallout from these actions.  And what changes to the system have occurred since, and what is in the works now.   

Report this comment
#2) On October 20, 2008 at 2:06 AM, TheGarcipian (34.84) wrote:

Therefore, Secretary Paulson must accept personal responsibility...

Yeah, like that's going to happen.  This, from an Administration that has shucked responsibility at every curve of its serpentine path towards destruction of civil liberties (habeus corpus, warrantless wire-tapping), sensible regulation and governmental oversight (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and Paulson's aforementioned lobbying), the Geneva Convention rules (torture), and the US Constitution (impeding justice & progress of the 9/11 Committee, subpoena thwarting, the treasonous leaking of a CIA operative's name, illegal firing of US Attorneys along party lines, etc.). Yeah, I'll hold my breath...

Great post, D.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners