Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

alstry (36.27)

Are Investors Simply Welfare Recipients....

Recs

10

June 07, 2010 – Comments (1)

The only reason most companies sell so much is because government borrows so much and gives it to people who don't work or work for the government.  In turn they spend the money government gave them at places where people really work who would not work if Obama didn't borrow trillions and give it to millions that didn't work so others could work.

So if you think about it, the only reason why millions of people have jobs is because tens of millions of people without jobs get free money from government borrowing from insolvent banks giving their employees billions in bonuses so those with jobs can serve those without jobs as it is the ones without jobs getting the free money.

Hmmmm.....something seems strange about that because if we cut off those without jobs from getting free money, those with jobs would lose their jobs because they would not have enough revenues to pay their salaries.

What seems so silly is Obama could simply borrow a little more and no one would have to work because he could give free money to everyone....not just to those select tens of millions to give the other working millions jobs.......but then with no one working we would have no place to spend the money and the money would serve no purpose.

What a twist....the working millions have become essentially welfare recipients from the non working entitlement receiving tens of millions......

So next time a Republican tells you we should cut back on entitlements....ask him or her if they expect to receive unemployment when they lose their income....and when a Demorcrat says we should continue to deficit spend....

ask them how much longer do you think the workers are going to be the slaves of the non workers?

1 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On June 07, 2010 at 10:19 PM, alstry (36.27) wrote:

HERE COMES THE FIGHT....

The rich need the tens of millions of welfare recipients and government workers to spend to stay rich.....and the welfare recipients/govt workers need the rich to pay taxes to support their welfare checks and salaries....

but the rich don't produce enough taxes to cover the growing welfare/govt expenses.

Thus, should the rich be taxed everything they have to keep the current system going.....or should the government cut back on welfare so we can watch the rich and most companies go broke?

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement