Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Back to BAC



August 30, 2011 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: BAC , BRK-A

I promised in this space - around January 2011 or so - that I'd be holding BAC and C for 2 years, or until the story significantly changed; that I wouldn't sell on price movement alone, that I'd hold on the thesis of future profits related to the eventual economic expansion and the market share they gained during this downturn.

No new information has come to light about these banks' balance sheets, but they've taken a 60% and 50% price cut.

And then Buffett stepped in and did his thing.

I've been gritting my teeth trying not to call this a significant change in the story.  But I think it is; I think the management of BAC just paid Berkshire a lot of money - no one knows how much, maybe billions of dollars - to get the use of Warren's good name (and his $5B in capital.)

BAC can access capital at the freakin' discount window for 0.25%.  Why is it using Berkshire's capital at 6% per annum, plus 700 million warrants strike price $7.14?  That's a hefty spread - unlimited upside for BRK in fact -and the only thing BAC is getting out of it is the reputational boost; Warren doesn't park $5 billion dollars somewhere if he thinks he's going to lose it.

Why did BAC need Buffett's good name?  What are they trying to paper over?

I'm still holding BAC - my molars wearing down all the while - but I see this latest development on balance positive for BRK, negative for BAC, extremely negative for the common schmuck shareholder who just took a 50% haircut on his stake and now is told that certain other special shareholders will get a 6% preferred dividend effective immediately.

Like the Roots, ain't saying nothing new.

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On August 30, 2011 at 10:40 PM, constructive (99.96) wrote:

You can't raise equity at the discount window. 

Report this comment
#2) On August 31, 2011 at 1:09 AM, awallejr (36.64) wrote:

BAC will survive because the FED won't let it fail.  But for the average shareholder it will take years for this company to recover.  That louse of a CEO named KEN LEWIS, yes yell his name in cursives on top of mountains, literally destroyed this company while making MILLIONS.

So now Buffet moves ahead of the average shareholder.  Well good for him for he saw a smart detail, but bad for the average shareholder who are going to suffer for years becuase of the greedy, stupid decisions made by Mr. Lewis.


Report this comment
#3) On August 31, 2011 at 1:11 AM, awallejr (36.64) wrote:


Report this comment
#4) On August 31, 2011 at 2:20 AM, ikkyu2 (98.17) wrote:

Wondered if anyone would catch that little logical lacune, MegaShort.  True enough.  I would have been happier, though, if BAC had just issued BRK a dilutive offering of $5B of common at or near market.  This is far worse.

Report this comment
#5) On September 02, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Physiques (< 20) wrote:

Am I missing something or is the Gov trying to destroy the financial institutions? 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners