Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Ben Stein's articles are so bad...

Recs

8

December 09, 2008 – Comments (11) | RELATED TICKERS: GM , F

They turned off the comment function on his most recent article. So I'll give everyone the opportunity to comment on it here.  Now of course I am part of the "Detroit should declare Chapter 11" crowd.  As a former dissatisfied owner of a GM car, I really dont feel particularly sympathetic to their plight. They are an inefficient company that has reached the end of its business cycle. I rant more about my views on GM in my Market Rant.  In the meantime, enjoy the article.

http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/yourlife/127875

 

 

Ben Stein How Not to Ruin Your LifeBail Out Detroit – Now

by Ben Stein

Posted on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 12:00AMUsually this column is about finance. It usually is an attempt to help the reader make money and have a more comfortable life. I am well aware that I have made a lot of mistakes and that in the short run many of my suggestions have turned out badly. Believe me, I am sorry. I still believe that in the long run the investment ideas will do well, but I am terribly sad that people's hopes have been disappointed in the short run.

My best guess is that we are in a panic of sellers and market manipulators and that we will recover within a few years, but I base this on history. We may have moved into a new phase where history is irrelevant. I would be surprised if that were so, since it's never been true before, but one never knows.

However, today, let's talk about the American auto companies. They need a bailout from us taxpayers, and they have to get it yesterday. Here's why

First, we are on thin ice economically. To allow our largest heavy industrial component to fail at this delicate moment is suicidal. To put a couple of million more Americans into unemployment is just not sensible. Mr. Barack Obama is talking about public works projects to employ hundreds of thousands of Americans -bridge building, school building, airport building. These projects take time to start, disrupt local community life, and are famously wasteful.

Why not be smart about it and NOT LET AMERICANS GET UNEMPLOYED IN THE FIRST PLACE? (Please pardon the shouting.) There are millions of Americans already hard at work making great American made cars and trucks. Why not keep them on the job? Wouldn't that be smarter than allowing the whole upper Midwest to fall into oblivion and then rescue it over a fifty year period?

Second, I get sick when I hear about how this or that professor says we cannot have bailouts in a free market. Really? How about the bailouts the professors get because gifts to colleges are tax free? How about the bailout they get because if they have to teach six hours a week they feel overwhelmed, while the guy on the line in Dearborn works a grueling forty and doesn't whine about it?

Somehow, we can give bailouts to investment banks where the top dogs make hundreds of millions a year for running the company into the ditch and wrecking the whole credit picture in America. Somehow we can have bailouts for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose bosses were trading on the credit of the taxpayers to make themselves rich while pumping up a serious housing bubble.

Amazingly, we can have whole fleets of C-130's fly to remote areas of Iraq and Afghanistan with pallets of hundred dollar bills piled from floor to ceiling. Then we can pass them out to warlords who make tea for our soldiers one hour and blow their guts out the next. We can send CIA operatives into Somalia and give millions, maybe hundreds of millions, to warlords to fight other killers.

But we cannot find it in our hearts to save our fellow Americans in Ohio and Michigan and Indiana who make the cars and trucks that about half of us buy? We can send billions to Germany and Japan to bail them out after they bombed us and killed our POWs and killed six million Jews. But we cannot help the children and grandchildren of the men and women who fought our war and made us the arsenal of democracy?

Something is very wrong here.

And please don't tell me how GM and Ford and Chrysler have made bad cars that people don't want. I drive only American cars, only GM cars actually, and they are the best, coolest cars I have ever driven: my 1962 Red Corvette, my mighty Cadillacs whose potent engines and super brakes have saved my life many times on the freeway. Yes, the cool people in DC and New York don't drive American cars. But a lot of other good people do and we love them. And my Cadillac dealer down here in the desert, Jessup Motors, gives me a lot better service than my Mercedes, Porsche, BMW, Jaguar, or Acura dealers ever did. I would trust my life to Detroit iron any time.

And why are we so angry at the car companies' executives? They get miserable pay by Wall Street standards and have much harder jobs. Why are we so angry at the unions? They negotiated their deals in good faith. It's not their fault that roller coaster gasoline prices messed up their world. They are our brothers and sisters. They fight our wars. They maintain our middle class lives. Maybe they get paid a lot, but they have been giving back for years. When will it ever be enough? And what about the retirees? They get the benefits they were promised. If those can be taken away, then whose benefits are safe? And do you think it will be cheaper if the government takes on those costs directly?

Let's stop the Depression before it starts. Let's show some fairness and good faith to our own. Let's bail out the Big Three, help them slim down, shape up, and keep making great cars and trucks. The Big Three are us and if we cannot help ourselves, who can we help?

 

11 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On December 09, 2008 at 3:57 PM, PVHamilton (< 20) wrote:

well, that explains how he had time to do a game show

Report this comment
#2) On December 09, 2008 at 4:10 PM, retailsails (98.15) wrote:

At least he admitted he made mistakes, unlike most.  He has been the ultimate contrarian indicator, screaming buy since the top.  The only reason to read his commentary, like watching CNBC, is for entertainment purposes...

Report this comment
#3) On December 09, 2008 at 4:13 PM, hansthered0 (< 20) wrote:

 We can send billions to Germany and Japan to bail them out after they bombed us and killed our POWs and killed six million Jews. But we cannot help the children and grandchildren of the men and women who fought our war and made us the arsenal of democracy?

Still dwelling on WWII??

He totally misses the issue here, which of course is that the big three are inneffecient companies. They are no better than the finance douchebaggs we already bailed out.

And the unions? Don't get me started. Where is that article about paying employees to sit and do nothing for 12 years because of some union clause?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/11/21/automakers-ask-bailout-paying-workers-sit/

Thousands of laid-off auto workers get paid $31 an hour to sit around and do nothing all year under a controversial program that could continue even if American taxpayers bail out the American auto industry.

The program, called "Jobs Banks," has been around for 24 years. Some of the employees at jobs banks choose to do community service, but others do crossword puzzles and watch TV all day -- or just stare at a wall. If you're a laid-off auto worker, it's what comes with your pink slip, thanks to a deal struck in 1984 between the United Auto Workers and the Big Three carmakers.

Report this comment
#4) On December 09, 2008 at 4:16 PM, abitare (99.38) wrote:

Ben Stien is a paid inept liar.

Report this comment
#5) On December 09, 2008 at 5:28 PM, TMFLomax (27.44) wrote:

Yeah, another stinker imho, haha... (although JRtrader is right, at least he admits he's wrong but that's about all I find very insightful about this article)...

Report this comment
#6) On December 09, 2008 at 5:57 PM, DemonDoug (98.73) wrote:

It boggles the mind that this man has a degree in economics from Columbia University.

Note to self: Never send offspring to Columbia U. for economics.

Second note to self: Send offspring to NYU for economics, if that's what they like (nouriel rubini for the win)

Report this comment
#7) On December 09, 2008 at 6:03 PM, FoolishChemist (98.16) wrote:

Giving a bailout to the auto companies is like giving a heart transplant to a smoking alcoholic who loves cheese burgers and has no intention of changing.  They are losing thousands on every car they sell.  This is not a viable business model.  Just because they enter bankruptcy does not mean they will disappear.  Look at the Tribune company.  A bankruptcy will give them a chance to clean up their business.

Report this comment
#8) On December 09, 2008 at 6:11 PM, charlesblazer (99.34) wrote:

The argument "we bailed out Wall Street, so why can't we bail out Detroit," which Ben Stein makes near the middle of that editorial and which I've heard from others as well, really bothers me. It bothers me first because I'm not convinced the Wall Street bailout was necessary. But even if it was, we now stand on a slippery slope where everything is compared to the Wall Street bailout. $25B seems small compared to several Trillion. Heck, everything is small compared to several Trillion. It is a ridiculous comparison that only enables more excessive spending.

On a level that we, as ordinary people, can relate to... This is the same "drop in the bucket" [il]logic that convinces us to buy unnecessary $1000 options when buying a $30,000 car. Or we pay $300 for that TV stand "bundled" with the $2000 widescreen TV. Or, what the heck, this wedding already costs $20,000, what's another $300 for a videographer? Last but not least, we pay 60 cents for that extra pump of french vanilla in our $3 coffee. Have I hit anything that you can identify with yet? I know that every single one of you has made one of those mistakes (or something like it) at some point. It's all silly; it's always a mistake; but we do it anyway, and we rationalize the mistake by reframing the scale. I know you've done that, too. But a 60-cent mistake is still a mistake. And a $25B mistake isn't any better after a $700B bailout.

Oh, and speaking of cars... Top fuel dragsters have over 6000 horsepower, so my sedan should have at least 300.

Report this comment
#9) On December 09, 2008 at 8:40 PM, outoffocus (24.48) wrote:

Good points FoolishChemist and Charlesblazer.

Im not convinced that any of these bailouts are necessary either. I feel instead of lowering interest rates, we should raise them. Interest rates should be at least 5%. It would be painful in the short run but would eventually stop our spiral into a 3rd world country. 

I think while we try to sustain the unsustainable, we are setting ourselves up for a serious day of reckoning ahead. I have to admit I'm a bit worried. Im not sure what to do. But thats why I read this website.

Report this comment
#10) On December 09, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Option1307 (30.51) wrote:

Oh, and speaking of cars... Top fuel dragsters have over 6000 horsepower, so my sedan should have at least 300...

 hahaha, awesome line...

Report this comment
#11) On December 26, 2008 at 7:44 PM, economicsjunkie (< 20) wrote:

I wrote two take downs about his utter nonsense:

 http://www.economicsjunkie.com/reflate-the-economy-now/

http://www.economicsjunkie.com/bail-out-detroit-now/

Best,
Nima

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement