Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Varchild2008 (85.23)

Bring the Conservative Party to Michigan NOW!

Recs

8

October 16, 2009 – Comments (8)

Varchild2008 is a proud Reagon Conservative, TEA PARTY Protestor / Activist who knows without a doubt that the RNC / NRCC are a bunch of Radical Leftist supporting baffoons.

I think it is long time to just write off the 2010 election and focus on the 2012 election...
Unlike the MEDIA types....I don't think the Republican Party does well in 2010.. Not at all...

That Political Party won't get 1 cent from me....  The Conservative Party just got $75 from me today in support of one of their candidates.  Mr. Hoffman.

We don't need relentless Scozzafava RINOs stinking up Washington D.C. with their Ultra Leftistism.   There's no inspiration or motivation to VOTE AT ALL anymore if the Republican Party thinks they have to put up RAGING LIBERALS in order to win?????

What kind of mentality is that?????

1st of all... The Best way to win elections is to put up CONSERVATIVES against the DEMOCRAT LIBERALS.....  THAT'S HOW YOU WIN!!!!!  Doesn't matter if you have a Republican Friendly District (which Scozzafava's distrcit IS Friendly to Republicans) or not.....

2nd....  By placing Conservatives on the ballot the Voters get a choice... Liberal.... or.....Conservative.....   They can actually get a CHOICE!!!!!  Rather than Brand X vs.  Brand X.

The issue of Third Parties is where I continue to differ from Rush Limbaugh.....

Rush Limbaugh says supporting Third Parties like the Conservative Party just makes Democrats win.

Varchild2008 says that continuing to ignore Third Parties doesn't create a movement for Conservatism that unfortunately needs to take multiple election cycles to really blossom.

Sure... I fully expect DEMOCRATS to hold their majorities in both houses of Congress if people vote for a Third Party like the CONSERVATIVE party.....    But, at the same time.... I strongly believe putting one's support around a Third Party over a long period of time will eventually mean the DEATH of the REPUBLICAN party.....

And in the interim it means the NRCC and RNC will be forced more and more to have to find CONSERVATIVES instead of thinking they can get away with putting out ULTRA LEFTY BAFFOONS....   PRESSURE the Republican Party by voting for a 3rd Party in 2010 makes sense to me perfectly in this regard....

As a Stock Market Investor.... I simply have a LONGER TERM Success Horizon than Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have.... I believe our true strength is in reforming the Republican Party by putting our support around a Third Party..... The Conservative Party....

So... In short....  I hope Mr. Hoffman makes good use of the money I sent him....

I also hope that the RNC/NRCC stop supporting the SCOZZ and start supporting Mr. Hoffman if they want to win against Owens. 

Don't want a third party?     Then...Here's a thought..... DUMP THE REPUBLICANS.

8 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Chromantix (97.69) wrote:

+1

Report this comment
#2) On October 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, catoismymotor (45.80) wrote:

+ 1 Rec because you have moxie!

Report this comment
#3) On October 16, 2009 at 7:08 PM, selfdestruct2 (43.97) wrote:

+1....I say vote all the bums out

Report this comment
#4) On October 16, 2009 at 8:00 PM, devoish (98.64) wrote:

We're not like those other Conservative Republicans, really. 

 

 

Report this comment
#5) On October 16, 2009 at 8:00 PM, foolishdoubler (< 20) wrote:

Unfortunately i beleive you are right.

Report this comment
#6) On October 16, 2009 at 8:03 PM, devoish (98.64) wrote:

If you are lucky you will get to run against this;

There's more, lots more.

Report this comment
#7) On October 19, 2009 at 12:49 AM, walt373 (99.80) wrote:

Hi Varchild, this isn't related to this blog, but I just wanted to let you know that there's an error in the way you value stocks. I remember reading some of your other blogs/posts where you imply that given all else equal, a lower share price for a stock is better or "cheaper". This is wrong. The share price of a stock is irrelevant because companies can arbitrarily choose the number of shares to split their companies into, and they can do a stock split or reverse split any time they want. You need to look at the market cap. Just letting you know!

Report this comment
#8) On October 23, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Varchild2008 (85.23) wrote:

I don't care about Market Caps.....  That only tells me whether a stock is a small, mid, large cap or mini cap stock....

The # of shares as you say can change on a whim for the reasons you listed...  But, they can also change based on Share Buybacks as well...

So a company dilluting their shares like (F) Ford....  May look bad to investors today but 10 years from now if they do a series of Share Buybacks.... It never really mattered what the share count was OR market cap was....

All I know is that whatever gimmick a company uses to provide a cheaper share price for their shares is a GOOD THING. 

Whirlpool's market cap has skyrocketed since March.  Share Price has gone through the roof....

I'd increase my stake in WHR but the share price makes me just hold the STOCK I have.... and not buy more..... 

If all you look at is technicals then you totally throw out the window the psychology of the individual investor.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement