CAPS Improvements?
January 23, 2007
– Comments (3)
Well.... Since you asked
Alot has been written about improving the scorekeeping in CAPS.
I agree with some of the ideas, (I have to hope any change will help my score) but the score will not be my biggest concern unless I get close to the top ten. (Fear not TMFEldrehad)
I am in this party to (at least based on my results so far) throw away points instead of dollars on my investing education.
But mostly I am here to learn from people generous enough to teach and to share their investing ideas and knowledge.
With that lofty goal In mind I would like to be able to search the CAPS sytem for Quills, light bulbs(5+ helpful pitches) most helpful pitches and pioneers and all the other lucky charms.
I would like all of us to be able to rate blogs (There are so many excellent blogs out there) and then search for highly rated blogs.
I would like to search top CAPS players based on performance without accuracy, and accuracy with more than x picks. (we could have more than one leader and a shot at a triple crown).
I would like to be able to search player rankings by more than one category at a time. (is that the same idea twice?)
Perhaps we could offer 1 point for each 5 helpful pitches or one for some number of helpful blogs instead of two cents.
O.K. thats it for now.
It is your game and I enjoy it as is.
I have no idea of the amount of work it would take to make these changes and I would never expect you do it except if you want to. I am sure there are some negatives to these ideas, especially the points for pitches thing.
Thanks for asking us though,
Steven
PS. I only just realized we could rate pitches, and I will start to do so.