Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Option1307 (29.86)

Comments for Charity: Stop Bye and Leave a Dime!

Recs

5

December 27, 2010 – Comments (103) | RELATED TICKERS: CHA , RIT , Y

Hey Fools,

 

With just under 2 weeks left for Foolanthropy 2010, it's time to step up our game and donate! 

Thurgood Marshall Academy needs your help, so get out there and comment away. This is quite possibly the easiest charity event you will ever attend, I mean seriously, every comment shows your generosity.

So get after it Fools!

103 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On December 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

You can comment about anything, stocks, economy, politics, your favorite food, best christmas story, etc.

Just comment!

Report this comment
#2) On December 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Oh look, here's another 10 cents!

Report this comment
#3) On December 28, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Does anybody have any idea how much money has been raised this year?

Report this comment
#4) On December 28, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

I'm gonna be honest, it seems like Fools have been slacking this year in comparison to the Foolanthropy last year.

Report this comment
#5) On December 28, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

That's weak Fools, pick it up!

Report this comment
#6) On December 28, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

What's the best piece of financial advice you would give to the students of TMA?

Report this comment
#7) On December 28, 2010 at 12:29 AM, TMFBabo (100.00) wrote:

I hate to say it as a micro cap lover, but blue chips look quite nice right now - especially those yielding more than the 10 year treasury.

Report this comment
#8) On December 28, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

I think I would tell them to learn about compound interest. It can be you best friend, or your worst nightmare and destroy your financial future. This seemingly simple concept needs to be understood clearly and you must be aware of it at all times.

For example:

Earning 7% a year seems like a small amount; however earning 7% a year for 10 years will double your money. NOT 10% per year for 10 years, but 7%. That is a huge difference.

On the other side of things, compound interest will absolutely destroy you on credit card bills, mortgage rates, student loan interst rates.

Let's walk through a quick example. Graduate school loans currently run you at 8.8% (seriously!). Let's say you graduate with 200K in loans and repay them in 10 years.

That means you will end up paying ~375K when all said and done to repay your 200K loan. This is absurd!!

Sometimes you need to take on loans such as these in order to achieve your educational goal. However, you need to understand the amount of debt you are taking on and REMEMBER that compound interset will heavily effect the outcome!

I know to many peers that do not understand this concept and are getting slaughtered by compound interst of their student loans.

Report this comment
#9) On December 28, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

blue chips look quite nice right now

For the most part I agree. They have run the least, if at all, during the recent rally.

MSFT, PFE, CSCO all look decent to me to name a few.

Report this comment
#10) On December 28, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Thanks for dropping by Babo!

Report this comment
#11) On December 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Momentum21 (73.89) wrote:

Option - I recently bought MSFT and CSCO but I have to say that I am getting turned off by the recent love each seems to be getting. : )

Babo - GNK is getting into double-down range for me. I believe Jan 1 will be the day it starts the run!

To offset my purchases of MSFT and CSCO I bought HRB today. That one might remain unloved for another quarter or two but tax time is coming. 

Report this comment
#12) On December 28, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Momentum21 (73.89) wrote:

I own ABT and AZN...probably should get some Pfizer as well. For better or worse big Pharma should start finding some favor...maybe I should just go with an ETF.  

Report this comment
#13) On December 28, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Momentum22 (29.55) wrote:

at a glance BMY looks like the proper call. 

Report this comment
#14) On December 28, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

AZN certainly looks attractive after the recent haircut because of the delayed FDA ruling on one of it's new drugs named Brilinta. The major concern I have with AZN is that they have several big time patents coming offline in the next few years.

Report this comment
#15) On December 28, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

Option, thanks for the opinion on CSCO, NFLX, and CMG that you left earlier.  I am grateful for the insights.  How do you like Amazon (as a purveyor of ebooks, stepping into the gap left by big booksellers) and Apple (doing the same with music)?  These are also on my short list.  I like NFLX, but it is time to change to the next growth stock.

Oh Look!  A dime!

Report this comment
#16) On December 28, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

GNK is another stock I've had my eye on for a long time now, basically ever since Babo alerted me to it. Although I haven't pulled the trigger on it yet. The entire sector just scares me in general!

I am watching GNK closely right now as it flirts with the $14/share level. If it drops much lower, there really isn't much support to speak of until much lower. I'm keeping my eye on it and waiting to see what direction it decideds to take.

Report this comment
#17) On December 28, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

A quick way to add up lots of dimes for TMA is to put something in the comment field.  Then when it comes up for your review, just hit "Post Comment" over and over again.  When you do, you add a comment for each time you click the button.

Caution:  A side effect of this is that the CAPS computer will decide you are spam and will shut down your account until some obliging TMF staffer comes along, reads your complaint, and reinstates you.  It also wreaks havoc with your computer.

Report this comment
#18) On December 28, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

A quick way to add up lots of dimes for TMA is to put something in the comment field.  Then when it comes up for your review, just hit "Post Comment" over and over again.  When you do, you add a comment for each time you click the button.

Caution:  A side effect of this is that the CAPS computer will decide you are spam and will shut down your account until some obliging TMF staffer comes along, reads your complaint, and reinstates you.  It also wreaks havoc with your computer.

Report this comment
#19) On December 28, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

I bought HRB today

I can't say I've looked at H&R Block in a long long time. I was quit surprised to see their dividend up in the 5% range, holy geez! I will need to look into it more but in the mean time what's your rational? Just looking for a quick pop come tax time or what?

Report this comment
#20) On December 28, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

That's already $2.00 Fools, keep it up! :)

Report this comment
#21) On December 28, 2010 at 1:08 AM, goalie37 (92.14) wrote:

*Writes Down HRB to go study*

Report this comment
#22) On December 28, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

probably should get some Pfizer as well.

Ever year or so I look into PFE and they apepar to be "cheap" and well positioned to make a run. But every year I hold off simply because they have possibly the ugliest 10 year chart in the history of the investing world. I just can't do it...

Report this comment
#23) On December 28, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

just hit "Post Comment" over and over again.

Thanks for the quick pointer Mary!

A side effect of this is that the CAPS computer will decide you are spam

Ha ha ha I remember you were missing for a few days, this must have been the reason. 

Hope all is well Mary!

Report this comment
#24) On December 28, 2010 at 1:20 AM, TMFBabo (100.00) wrote:

Since we're talking about GNK, I'll offer a quick update...

I'm bearish on dry bulk shippers in general.  The ship supply situation is an absolute mess.  I'd avoid shippers with old fleets and also shippers that can't manage to make money in today's environment.  Companies that can't make money now will have no chance when more supply comes online.  

I do like GNK the most in this industry - I think it's undervalued trading at less than 4 times trailing earnings.  There is a decent amount of debt and there may be more, if management decides to buy more ships.  Management does not shy away from debt and will jump on a ship purchase as long as the ships are attractively priced.

In general, I do like the management, the relatively new fleet, and the strong earnings and cash flows.  

The major upside catalyst is the reinstatement of the dividend.  I think the share price would appreciate a good deal if it were to happen.  The dividend reinstatement is likely tied to asset (ship) values and/or debt ratios.  If management finds another attractive group of ships to purchase, the debt ratios could get worse from the current levels.  Management seeks to deleverage a bit, but who knows if another ship acquisition is in the cards?

Ship values seem to move up and down with the BDI, so it's possible things will get worse before they get better here too.  I'm guessing we need the asset values to appreciate a good deal if they're part of the covenant that deals with the reinstatement of the dividend.

The most obvious bear case is the ship supply problem.  The risk is that as ships come online, GNK will either have trouble chartering their ships at all or they'll have to charter them at significantly lower rates.  Analysts' estimates stand at $2.73 for 2011, which is a lot lower than its trailing 12 months' earnings of over $4.  

GNK has beaten expectations 4 straight quarters and seem to control operating and maintenance costs quite nicely.  I think earnings might fall a bit, but I don't expect GNK to have ships lying around all over the place - I think that's what will happen to higher cost operators with older fleets.  I'd expect earnings to fall somewhere higher than $2.73 and lower than $4.00 (I'm looking for $3 something - precise, I know)  

I think GNK is better than a nice shipper paying a great dividend because it has more capital appreciation potential - a dividend reinstatement would be a very nice catalyst.  A shipper already paying a dividend doesn't have that same catalyst - it would have to rely on a higher BDI as its only catalyst.  

Report this comment
#25) On December 28, 2010 at 1:20 AM, TMFBabo (100.00) wrote:

@Mary953: Please behave yourself and don't get flagged as a spammer again!

Report this comment
#26) On December 28, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

How do you like Amazon (as a purveyor of ebooks, stepping into the gap left by big booksellers) and Apple (doing the same with music)?

AAPL is lot like GOOG (well sort of) imo, both are great companies and are here to stay. Both stocks have had termendous runs and have been the sterotypical "growth" stocks.

The question that now arises is how do they perform going forward? It basically comes down to whether or not you believe they can keep up their rapid double digit growth in the coming years. If you do, Apple certainly doesn't look expensive at only ~16 times 2011 earnings anda similar argument can be made for Google as well.

For me these are both really hard calls. Are they still growth stocks? Maybe, and if so they deserve higher multiples. However, is their growth peaking and they are going to perform like MSFT the last decade, i.e. go nowhere in terms of stock price and become more of a value play than a high flyer? Nobody knows for sure and that's the million dollar question.

I do believe GOOG will continue to grow; however I don't think I'd be a buyer here because the risk reward isn't where I like it. AAPL is firing on all cylinders right now and if I had to make a bet I'd feel much better with them. They are the "coolest" thing since, well, ever. Apple is going to be a dominate force for the foreseeable future.

Report this comment
#27) On December 28, 2010 at 1:28 AM, goalie37 (92.14) wrote:

*Reports Mary as Spam as the kids get 10 more cents.

 

j/k 

Report this comment
#28) On December 28, 2010 at 1:31 AM, goalie37 (92.14) wrote:

I love AMZN and so badly want to be a shareholder, but not at this price.  Even if growth continues, which I believe it will, I don't see the stock having the same multiple 5 years from now.  That means the stock will not do as well as the company.  Someday I will be able to justify buying it again.

Report this comment
#29) On December 28, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Thanks for the update Babo, always great to here your thoughts on GNK. Well really any stock for that matter!

Report this comment
#30) On December 28, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

How do you like Amazon

Ha ha I just realized I never really answered your question on this. In short, I wouldn't touch it at these levels with real money. But this is not really my style. It again fits into the same category as GOOG and AAPL and thus we are left with the same question, do you believe their growth will continue going forward? 

I guess I am less inclined to believe that it will. Also, AMZN is priced significantly higher with a forward P/E of ~70, holy geez!

I think goalie brought up a good point,

That means the stock will not do as well as the company.

You can believe in a compnay but still not like their stock. This is an important concept that we investors continually struggle with.

Report this comment
#31) On December 28, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Keep it coming Fools!

$3.00 and counting, woo!

Report this comment
#32) On December 28, 2010 at 1:43 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

I'm gonna be honest, it seems like Fools have been slacking this year in comparison to the Foolanthropy last year.

Report this comment
#33) On December 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Stop "bye"? Do you mean stop "buy"? Or stop bye bye.

"By" Dimus Maximus 

Report this comment
#34) On December 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Stop "bye"? Do you mean stop "buy"? Or stop bye bye.

"By" Dimus Maximus 

Report this comment
#35) On December 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Stop "bye"? Do you mean stop "buy"? Or stop bye bye.

"By" Dimus Maximus 

Report this comment
#36) On December 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Stop "bye"? Do you mean stop "buy"? Or stop bye bye.

"By" Dimus Maximus 

Report this comment
#37) On December 28, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Stop "bye"? Do you mean stop "buy"? Or stop bye bye.

"By" Dimus Maximus 

Report this comment
#38) On December 28, 2010 at 1:45 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

I don't know about that, you've got-

Report this comment
#39) On December 28, 2010 at 1:48 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Cato's Tuition Generator

Report this comment
#40) On December 28, 2010 at 1:52 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Cato's Tuition Generator

Report this comment
#41) On December 28, 2010 at 1:53 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Ask A Blunt Man - The Charity Edition

Report this comment
#42) On December 28, 2010 at 2:01 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

And my awesome blog... ; )

Kick out the Jams.

Report this comment
#43) On December 28, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

 "Buy" Jove, it still works. Nice trick Mary. I'll tell you what's missing- it's Sinch and his annual Herculean fundraiser effort. Anyone else notice he's pretty much bailed from here? I had the "machine gun" post thing down last year and was promptly scolded "bye" the Strongman himself.

Report this comment
#44) On December 28, 2010 at 2:07 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

And babo's-

Foolanthropy 2010 is Here! Stop By and Leave a Comment!

Report this comment
#45) On December 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

So I would storngly disagree,

Report this comment
#46) On December 28, 2010 at 2:14 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

But I'm a slacker... ; )

Report this comment
#47) On December 28, 2010 at 2:16 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

All I can say is-

Report this comment
#48) On December 28, 2010 at 2:17 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Dime!!!

Report this comment
#49) On December 28, 2010 at 2:22 AM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Hey Mark,

You want #50.

Can't belive I just used the term-

storngly... ;)

Report this comment
#50) On December 28, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Nah. Well, ok. For the strongman @43. Gone but not forgotten.

Report this comment
#51) On December 28, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Nah. Well, ok. For the strongman @43. Gone but not forgotten.

Report this comment
#52) On December 28, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Nah. Well, ok. For the strongman @43. Gone but not forgotten.

Report this comment
#53) On December 28, 2010 at 2:37 AM, TMFDanDzombak (83.06) wrote:

Report this comment
#54) On December 28, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

I tried adding one that said Ignore this Post.  It was really and truly one that I wanted skipped.  I wanted to see if the rapid fire really worked.  I had over 200 comments before I was kicked out as spam.

Report this comment
#55) On December 28, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

After that, I had to use my anonymous id of Hanginout to blog with until I got a chance to get back in under my blogging title.

Report this comment
#56) On December 28, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

Did I mention that you can use Control + End to go straight to the bottom of a blog?  It really does help.

Report this comment
#57) On December 28, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

lemoneater has had some great blogs this time around including a scavenger hunt for types of literary devices.  It was a lot of fun.

Report this comment
#58) On December 28, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

Ignore this blog had 320 comments by the time it ended.  Most of them were "dime" or "10 cents"

Report this comment
#59) On December 28, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Mary953 (75.22) wrote:

Harry had a great blog about Ron Santos that gathered more than 100 comments and I learned a lot about a really great couple of guys during that one.  (Yeah, Harry, you are one of them, but then I always did like drummers!)

Report this comment
#60) On December 28, 2010 at 7:53 AM, xuanchuang wrote:

Features: AAA QUALITY, COMPETITIVE PRICE AND SERVICE welcome to ======== http://www.gotootoo.com ========1) The goods are shipping by air express, such as EMS,the shipping time is in 5-7 business days 2) They are in stock now; 3) Various styles and color for clients’ choice 4) The Products are fit for most people, because of our wholesale price 
ugg45$ puma gucci$35,nike jordans six ring,yeezy$%5!!
new era caps$13 gucci handbags jeans,t-shirts sunglass,caps
true religion jeans$35,ca,ed hardy jeans$35,nfl jerseys$20
LV,CHANAL,HANDBAGS$35 ======== http://www.gotootoo.com ======== NIKE SHOX+AIR MAX+TL3+OZ+NZ ONLY $35
UGG TIMBLAND+LACOSTE SHOES+ED HARDY SHOES$35
DIESEL T-SHIRT,GSTAR T-SHIRT,CA T-SHIRT,50% OFF FOR SALE $15
DIOR SUNGLASS,DG SUNGLASS$15
our website: (http://www.gotootoo.com)fd

Report this comment
#61) On December 28, 2010 at 8:00 AM, xuanchuang wrote:

Wonderful. Share a website with you , (http://www.gotootoo.com) Believe you will love it. huge select of jerseys, wholesale price.
http://www.gotootoo.com
NFL JERSEYS $27NBA JERSEYS $30MLB JERSEYS $30NHL JERSEYS $35.98
IF you order more than 10 pieces jersey, the shipping fees is free.accept paypal, IPS, western union, credit card.shipping method is EMS, We will offer a tracking number to you when send the goods to you.delivery time is 5—8days, and door to door.
http://www.gotootoo.com
F

Report this comment
#62) On December 28, 2010 at 8:18 AM, motleyanimal (82.80) wrote:

I'm helping!

Report this comment
#63) On December 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, ChrisGraley (29.87) wrote:

even spammers make dimes!

Report this comment
#64) On December 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, ChrisGraley (29.87) wrote:

even spammers make dimes!

Report this comment
#65) On December 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, ChrisGraley (29.87) wrote:

even spammers make dimes!

Report this comment
#66) On December 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

So I would storngly disagree,

Ok I guess you are right. I just remember the massive blog put together by TMFSinchiruna lasst year. Now that thing was huge!

Report this comment
#67) On December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

even spammers make dimes!

Ha ha thanks Spammers! This is the one and only time I don't want totake them out back and shoot them... ;)

Report this comment
#68) On December 28, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

I'm helping!

Thanks motelyanimal!

Report this comment
#69) On December 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Yeah, comments for charity are fun!!

Report this comment
#70) On December 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

$7.00 and counting, you're welcome TMA!

Report this comment
#71) On December 28, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Is it just me or is the traffic around the Fool slow this week bc of the holidays?

I think the Gardner brothers speciffically picked these few weeks so they can lessen the amount of dimes they have to give. Ha jk! :)

Report this comment
#72) On December 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

What kind of investments do you make? More sepcifically, what sorts of stocks do you typically buy Fools?

Report this comment
#73) On December 28, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Are you always hoping for the ultimate growth/value stock, constantly trying to hit a "home run" each and every time you invest? Or do you prefer to stick with the "slow and steady" approach?

Report this comment
#74) On December 28, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

I'd have to say that I'm somewhat of a combination of both strategies. I'm young enough were I believe in taking a large amount of risk in hopes of capital appreciation. However, I certainly have a decent portion of my portfolio locked up in large blue chips, dividend paying compnaies, and even a few mutual funds.

For example,

1) I speculated a bit with MCZ, CDCS, and NTWK this past year.

2) I've held MO for the better part of forever as a stable dividend paying position.

3) Refiners have been a decent chunk of my portfolio the last 18-24 months because I felt they were a good value play. Wasn't necessarily looking for a home run, but confident they would appreciate more than blue chips.

Report this comment
#75) On December 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

For me at least, this strategy works. Part of my portfolio is generating stable returns, albeit somewhat small, but relevant nonetheless.

With another portion of my funds I typically allocate somewhat equal positions into higher risk/reward and even speculative stocks.

I prefer the equal sized positions in this category in hopes of eliminating my emotionally ties to stocks and just as importantly if your speculation turns out wrong you won't be wiped out. Also, with equal sizes, one home run can make up for several stocks that floundered.

Report this comment
#76) On December 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Wake up Fools and get in here!

Report this comment
#77) On December 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Large Caps, preferably with a growing dividend.

 

Report this comment
#78) On December 28, 2010 at 1:42 PM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

Junior miners, and the physical Silver.

 

Report this comment
#79) On December 28, 2010 at 1:48 PM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

10% spec.

Really dangerous. Could lose it all, but so far I've done well.

Report this comment
#80) On December 28, 2010 at 1:52 PM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

(knocks on wood, as he wonders if that 10% bet will pay off.... ;)

Report this comment
#81) On December 28, 2010 at 1:59 PM, EnigmaDude (86.54) wrote:

Just bought some shares of INTC.  Everyone is loving CSCO right now but I am hoping that by adding a small position in Intel that my long-term investment will serve me better than if I had gone with a similar investment in CSCO.  Maybe after they start paying a dividend I will take a fresh look at them...

Report this comment
#82) On December 28, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Thanks for the dimes everybody!

Report this comment
#83) On December 28, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

INTC is another one I've had on my radar for a long time now. As with most of these types of plays, they remain on my "watch list" but I haven't been able to pull the trigger.

Report this comment
#84) On December 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, HarryCaraysGhost (99.69) wrote:

@59-

Mary, thank you for your kind words.

One of my favorite parts of Foolanthrophy, is making new freinds while posting for charity.

And you are a freind indeed.

John.

Report this comment
#85) On December 29, 2010 at 2:39 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

Rather than start another blog, I think I will add some comments to this one to help reach 100.

@ #57 Glad that you had fun, Mary, so did I :)!

Report this comment
#86) On December 29, 2010 at 2:44 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

My first introduction to investing started when I was really young about five. I didn't know why my father would be excited to read the paper to find out about socks and bonnets. Only recently have understood the appeal for myself.

 

Report this comment
#87) On December 29, 2010 at 2:46 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

Recently I've been thinking about how the game of Monopoly relates to investing. 

Report this comment
#88) On December 29, 2010 at 2:48 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

There are the four railroads. Extra credit to anyone who names all four. 

Report this comment
#89) On December 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM, TMFBabo (100.00) wrote:

Reading, Pennsylvania, B&O, Short Line

Report this comment
#90) On December 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

Then there are the utilities. Water and Electricity. I guess I've always known that utilities were for investment. Go Duke Power :)

I don't have a direct investment in water although I think Corning makes some water filtration products. 

Report this comment
#91) On December 29, 2010 at 2:56 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

However, the bulk of Monopoly appears to be Commercial Real Estate with the goal of property development through establishing hotels.

Report this comment
#92) On December 29, 2010 at 2:59 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

If we remade Monopoly nowadays we would need to include spaces for precious metal. Gold and Silver at the very least.

Report this comment
#93) On December 29, 2010 at 3:02 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

We also should have a couple spots for oil for alone. We also shouldn't forget coal and natural gas.

Report this comment
#94) On December 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

Then we mustn't forget banks perhaps ownership of banks should increase the likelihood of the player going to jail more frequently.

Report this comment
#95) On December 29, 2010 at 3:08 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

@ #89 Way to go, Babo! I wonder if any of those railroads are still operational.

 

Report this comment
#96) On December 29, 2010 at 3:10 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

Also Apple should get a space as should Amazon.

Report this comment
#97) On December 29, 2010 at 3:14 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

I think we should also have Microsoft somewhere on the board. We really need to have all kinds of tech companies.

Report this comment
#98) On December 29, 2010 at 3:16 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

I think we need a space called "Enron" it would be bad like jail and only monopoly players that didn't diversify enough during the game would go there.

Report this comment
#99) On December 29, 2010 at 3:20 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

There should be a stack of cards called "Due Diligence" some of which could keep you out of jail and others out of Enron. Others would allow you to get a special dividend or develop your property or business for less.

Report this comment
#100) On December 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

As for community chest there should be a lot of bailout cards added with infrastructure cards helping to mitigate bailout cards.

Report this comment
#101) On December 29, 2010 at 3:25 PM, lemoneater (77.52) wrote:

There is nothing like adding complications to a board game to ruin the fun :).

I'm off to stir some stew I have in the crock pot. Whoever invented the crock pot was a real philanthropist. 

Report this comment
#102) On December 30, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

Thanks for the help lemoneater!!!

Report this comment
#103) On December 30, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Option1307 (29.86) wrote:

We cranked out $10.00 for TMA just by commenting, I wish stock picking was this easy! :)

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement