Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Corporate Welfare and the Fiscal Cliff



January 06, 2013 – Comments (9)

Eight Corporate Subsidies in the Fiscal Cliff Bill, From Goldman Sachs to Disney to NASCAR

Matt Stoller is a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. You can follow him at

Throughout the months of November and December, a steady stream of corporate CEOs flowed in and out of the White House to discuss the impending fiscal cliff. Many of them, such as Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, would then publicly come out and talk about how modest increases of tax rates on the wealthy were reasonable in order to deal with the deficit problem. What wasn’t mentioned is what these leaders wanted, which is what’s known as “tax extenders”, or roughly $205B of tax breaks for corporations. With such a banal name, and boring and difficult to read line items in the bill, few political operatives have bothered to pay attention to this part of the bill. But it is critical to understanding what is going on.

The negotiations over the fiscal cliff involve more than the Democrats, Republicans, the middle class and the wealthy. The corporate sector is here in force as well. One of the core shifts in the Reagan era was the convergence of wealthy individuals who wanted to pay less in taxes – many from the growing South – with corporations that wanted tax breaks. Previously, these groups fought over the pie, because the idea of endless deficits did not make sense. Once Reagan figured out how to finance yawning deficits, the GOP was able to wield the corporate sector and the new sun state wealthy into one force, epitomized today by Grover Norquist. What Obama is (sort of) trying to do is split this coalition, and the extenders are the carrot he’s dangling in front of the corporate sector to do it.

Most tax credits drop straight to the bottom line – it’s why companies like Enron considered its tax compliance section a “profit center”. A few hundred billion dollars of tax expenditures is a major carrot to offer. Surely, a modest hike in income taxes for people who make more than $400k in income and stupid enough not to take that money in capital gain would be worth trading off for the few hundred billion dollars in corporate pork. This is what the fiscal cliff is about – who gets the money. And by leaving out the corporate sector, nearly anyone who talks about this debate is leaving out a key negotiating partner.

So without further ado, here are eight corporate subsidies in the fiscal cliff bill that you haven’t heard of.

1) Help out NASCAR - Sec 312 extends the “seven year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complex property”, which is to say it allows anyone who builds a racetrack and associated facilities to get tax breaks on it. This one was projected to cost $43 million over two years.

2) A hundred million or so for Railroads - Sec. 306 provides tax credits to certain railroads for maintaining their tracks. It’s unclear why private businesses should be compensated for their costs of doing business. This is worth roughly $165 million a year.

3) Disney’s Gotta Eat - Sec. 317 is “Extension of special expensing rules for certain film and television productions”. It’s a relatively straightforward subsidy to Hollywood studios, and according to the Joint Tax Committee, was projected to cost $150m for 2010 and 2011.

4) Help a brother mining company out – Sec. 307 and Sec. 316 offer tax incentives for miners to buy safety equipment and train their employees on mine safety. Taxpayers shouldn’t have to bribe mining companies to not kill their workers.

5) Subsidies for Goldman Sachs Headquarters – Sec. 328 extends “tax exempt financing for  York Liberty Zone,” which was a program to provide post-9/11 recovery funds. Rather than going to small businesses affected, however, this was, according to Bloomberg, “little more than a subsidy for fancy Manhattan apartments and office towers for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Corp.” Michael Bloomberg himself actually thought the program was excessive, so that’s saying something. According to David Cay Johnston’s The Fine Print, Goldman got $1.6 billion in tax free financing for its new massive headquarters through Liberty Bonds.

6) $9B Off-shore financing loophole for banks – Sec. 322 is an “Extension of the Active Financing Exception to Subpart F.” Very few tax loopholes have a trade association, but this one does. This strangely worded provision basically allows American corporations such as banks and manufactures to engage in certain lending practices and not pay taxes on income earned from it. According to this Washington Post piece, supporters of the bill include GE, Caterpillar, and JP Morgan. Steve Elmendorf, super-lobbyist, has been paid $80,000 in 2012 alone to lobby on the “Active Financing Working Group.” 

7) Tax credits for foreign subsidiaries –  Sec. 323 is an extension of the “Look-through treatment of payments between related CFCs under foreign personal holding company income rules.” This gibberish sounding provision cost $1.5 billion from 2010 and 2011, and the US Chamber loves it. It’s a provision that allows US multinationals to not pay taxes on income earned by companies they own abroad.

8) Bonus Depreciation, R&D Tax Credit – These are well-known corporate boondoggles. The research tax credit was projected to cost $8B for 2010 and 2011, and the depreciation provisions were projected to cost about $110B for those two years, with some of that made up in later years.

Conveniently, the Joint Committee on Taxation in 2010 did an analysis of what many of these extenders cost. You can find that report here.


Topics: Guest Post

 Email This Post Posted by Matt Stoller at 8:57 pm

What kind of hypocrasy does it take to put these items into the fiscal cliff bill? Especially #'s 5 and 6! Didn't we bail out banks enough?

9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On January 06, 2013 at 11:18 PM, whereaminow (< 20) wrote:

Sec. 317 is “Extension of special expensing rules for certain film and television productions”. It’s a relatively straightforward subsidy to Hollywood studios, and according to the Joint Tax Committee, was projected to cost $150m for 2010 and 2011.

My personal favorite. Hollywood liberals screaming that the rich should pay more in taxes getting a tax break in a bill that supposedly raises taxes on the rich.

David in Liberty

Report this comment
#2) On January 07, 2013 at 1:00 AM, awallejr (36.02) wrote:

Well here you got me Chris.  Gotta love when special interest amendments are added to bills.

Report this comment
#3) On January 07, 2013 at 10:55 AM, L0RDZ (90.67) wrote:

I was gonna post  about the octo mom  supposedly  going back on  the welfare dole...

But apparently  there's  a lot of  charity  gone  wrong...

WOW at  hollywood studios  needing  tax  credits,  if  only  taxes weren't  such a  economic  buzz-kill,  and mechanism to limit activity.

Still  how  does the octo mom  still have  her kids,  and shes exhausted  from  xanax ??  I  think not... she looks more like a meth person given  she  has  dental  needs now ?

She doesn't even take care of her kids, she has  friends and nannies do it while  she  hits  the pipe...  ( so i'm told by a passing bird).





Report this comment
#4) On January 07, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Option1307 (30.65) wrote:

Awesome ha ha!

Report this comment
#5) On January 07, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Starfirenv (< 20) wrote:

Ha, they were given 3 mins to read the 150 pages prior to voting on this.  Worst part is, it will add $4 Trill to our debt in ten yrs. Now,we're saved!  Yay!

The Big Winners:  Big Banks and Big Companies

The “fiscal cliff” deal will raise taxes for 77% of the American public.

It will add $4 trillion dollars to the deficit over the next 10 years.

It will create a drag on the economy equal to 1% of the gross domestic product.

It creates uncertainty in the following areas:

A) the debt limit, B) the sequestered amounts, C) cuts in entitlement spending, D) additional taxes and don’t forget E) the President needs another Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the lights on.

Blackrock’s Larry Fink is correct when he says:

The American People are the Big Losers In The Cliff Deal.

Who benefits? The deal gives Puerto Rican rum makers, Nascar, banks like Goldman Sachs, and General Electric and other big companies tax subsidies. History repeats again and again.

H/T Washington's Blog-

Report this comment
#6) On January 07, 2013 at 2:49 PM, lemoneater (56.94) wrote:

I found #4 of particular interest given the earlier tragedy at Massey Mine. I'm all for mine safety. I can think of worst things to put tax dollars towards, yet whatever happened to the self-sufficient business with an ethical structure to protect its own employees as a non-negotiable part of its continuing existence. Safety should never be a luxury or a perk.

Report this comment
#7) On January 07, 2013 at 5:36 PM, ChrisGraley (28.50) wrote:

I would prefer a law to a subsidy lemoneater and I'm pretty anti-regulation.

Report this comment
#8) On January 08, 2013 at 11:00 AM, lemoneater (56.94) wrote:

Yes, I was upset to learn that Massey paid fines for safety violations but found it cheaper to keep the dangerous status quo.

I'm not for big government either, but law should protect human life from human greed.

Report this comment
#9) On January 08, 2013 at 3:19 PM, ChrisGraley (28.50) wrote:

Easy enough to make those fines hurt enough make a difference, but I would prefer giving the families the legal ground to take the mining company to the cleaners.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners