Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Currency contrast of commodity prices

Recs

9

November 04, 2007 – Comments (1)

I am Canadian and as such when I look at commodity prices I convert to Canadian dollars.  Earlier in the year the conversion meant adding as much as 19% onto the US quoted price yet today it means take 7% off.

 

The change in currency valuation is enormous for the base metal industry.  If you look at the mining industry from a world perspective, there are some mines in the US, and for those mines wages have effectively declined as the US dollar has lost value in comparison to other currencies.  The US has gone from a high of 1.1875 on Feb. 7 of this year to a low of 0.9323 this past week.  At its height earlier in the year the US dollar was “worth” 27% more relative to the Canadian dollar.  A $30/hour US wage on Feb 7th was $35.62 Canadian and at the low, this week, it is $27.97 Canadian.  Canadian wages have done the opposite.  A $30/hour Canadian wage at the height of the US dollar was $25.26 US and now it is $32.18 US.

 

For US based mining companies wages are fairly fixed relative to the US quoted commodity price.  Their might be union contracts that give them an increase, but when you do your back of the napkin calculation on a company using commodity prices you do not need to correct for costs due to currency changes for mines located in the US.  That cannot be said for mines located in the rest of the world.

 

Given that the US dollar has lost ground with almost all other currencies, when the “costs” are converted to US dollars the increases will be staggering, as the wage conversion calculation above shows.  I suspect many investors are not going to be prepared for what this does to the value of their investments.  The full effect of these increased costs are not going to show up in the third quarter financial reports, although some will.  For the third quarter the US dollar averaged around 1.05.  As of this week it has declined a further 12%.  Only a portion of those wage changes will show up in the next series of quarterly reports.  Expect to see costs up in that 12% range for 4th quarter results being reported next January to March.

 

The margins, or earnings, on base metal stocks are affected by both the costs, which are in the currency of the country and the commodity prices, which are quoted in US dollars.  The workers may not have gotten wages, but once the costs are converted to US dollars, they are simply up dramatically relative to the US dollar in most countries.  This is not good for investors, especially investors in commodity stocks with high P/Es.  In general, I suspect that chances are if a base metal stock has a P/E over about 6-12 right now, depending on other strengths/weakness of the company, it is going to correct downwards in the next year, indeed, if the LME warehouse stock levels continue to rise this estimate may be conservative because of metal price declines due to increasing supply. 

 

The one year copper spot price shows three almost equal peaks in the spot price of about $3.70 US, in April, July and October.  In Canadian dollars those “peaks” are about $4.25, $3.85 and $3.60.  Today in Canadian the US price of $3.40 is about $3.16 Canadian.  In Canadian dollars the price of copper was about 35% higher at its peak.  In an earlier blog I looked at the Bingham Canyon mine.  About 2/3rds of the revenue when straight to earnings for the period I looked at it.  Because this mine is located in the US it is not going to see enormous wage increases, although it will probably see large energy costs increasing.  However, this mine will still have exceptionally healthy earnings, although the margin may decline a little.  This mine has lots of room that if it saw a 35% hair cut on revenues it is still highly profitable, with probably 40-50% of revenue making it to earnings.  Contrast that to a mine with say 20% of revenue with strong prices going to earnings.  At 35% hair cut in commodity prices means that the mine is now losing money.

 

I dislike nickel immensely, and here’s why.  Nickel prices peaked in April at around $24/lb US.  In Canadian that would be around $27.50, and there is a lot of nickel being mined in Canada.  On Friday nickel closed at $14.35 US, which is now about $13.40 Canadian.  Nickel peaked at a price over 100% higher.  The good thing about nickel is the peak was a short-term spike and that utterly unsustainable price only got averaged into earnings for a very short period.  The very, very bad thing about nickel is that a number of nickel stocks have priced in an earnings expectation based on a much higher nickel price than is realistic.  The current price is already a strong nickel price and a wise investor would be evaluating their investment at $10-12/lb nickel.  I believe to have priced a nickel stock with a high P/E with the outrageous nickel price of $21.65/lb, or $25 Canadian, as investors in FNX mining did in the first quarter will prove to be economic suicide. 

 

In my May 30th post on FNX I pointed out many problems with investing in this company, and in the shorter term the price has gone higher than the roughly $35/share it was at then.  But, short-term hype and speculation is not true valuation and this is the type of investment susceptible a wake-up-one-morning to 40-50% haircut.  Going back to first quarter, earnings were $30 million (extrapolate to $120 million full year expectation) with an average price of $21.65 and an exchange rate of 1.17.  Guidance was that earnings are supposed to decline by $9 million per $1 decline in nickel price, so expect $66 million decline from the contraction of nickel price.  A 10% change in exchange will kill another $12.7 million in earnings, so expect another $32 million decline from exchange, or $98 million.  That leaves about $22 million for full year earnings, or $5.5 million per quarter.  Factoring in the roughly 70% increase in production expected, that would give about $9 million per quarter, or earnings of $36 million per year.  Assuming share count has not increase, which is full year earnings of about $0.42/share, outrageously low for a $37 commodity stock.  The earnings have gone 36c the first quarter, 40c the second quarter and 15c this past quarter, yet this quarter had record output.  Earnings were 24c/share in Q3 the year before.  Output increased by 50%, yet instead of a 50% increase in earnings to 36c, earning were 15c, an expectation decline of 58%.  The average exchange rate was 1.04 for quarter 3.  Now it is 0.93.  That 15c/quarter extrapolated to a full year is 60c, but factor in that further currency decline and expect to see next quarter earnings of 10-12c.

 

Anyone doing a peer valuation of their nickel stock relative to FNX is seriously misleading himself or herself.

I expected the US dollar to decline relative to the Canadian dollar, but never in my wildest dreams would I have predicted 0.9323 this fast.  I suspect there is not an analyst report out there that has factored in the drastic loss of revenues, or alternative drastic cost increases, due to the strong changes in valuation of the US dollar.

 

I don’t have time to look at the degree of change in other commodity prices right now, but my prediction is 100% US companies will perform better relative to companies with operations in other countries because they will only be dealing with how commodity prices affect their bottom line where as other companies will have the huge challenges of how the drastic decline in the US dollar affects either costs or revenues, depending on what currency they do their reporting in.

1 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 05, 2007 at 2:34 AM, ikkyu2 (99.30) wrote:

I went test driving cars last month.  Because I'm a doctor and quite happily drive a BMW now, I tested a couple BMWs, some Mercedes, and a Lexus hybrid.

Just for laughs I went to sit in a Corvette and that salesman also put me behind the wheel of a couple Cadillacs.

In every way I cared about - power, transmission, handling, interior, exterior, seats, instruments, GPS - the American cars were equal or better to their foreign competitors at a 30-50% price discount.  (Exterior design and fuel economy were two places you could argue about.)  I want you to understand that this came as a total shock to me.  I own a 1965 Pontiac, have been a car nut since I could walk, and I have not found that any American cars were superior to their foreign counterparts since 1969.

Put that together with your weak-dollar thesis and the new labor agreements concluded this week and GM and F look super-attractive to me.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement