Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

sagitarius84 (41.04)

Dividends versus Share Buybacks/Stock repurchases



June 25, 2009 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: GE , IBM , XOM

                                                             Read Article

Companies have several means through which they share their prosperity with shareholders. Dividends are the portion of corporate profits paid out to stockholders in the form of cash. Share buybacks on the other hand represent cash distributed to existing shareholders in exchange for a fraction of the company’s outstanding equity. While both methods have their pros and cons, when used carefully, they could strongly add to the total returns of long-term shareholders.

Share Repurchases have gained popularity among companies because there's a total flexibility with them, whereas dividend payments require a commitment. With repurchases a company could spend billions buying back its stock in one year, and then spend nothing for the next few years. With dividends however a company that cuts, eliminates or suspends its payment would likely enrage shareholders.

Some investors believe that stock buybacks are the most tax efficient way for companies to return cash to shareholders. Currently, the highest tax on qualified dividend income is 15% for the top income tax bracket. When companies earn money, they pay taxes on it. When companies pay dividends, dividends are taxed again at the individual level.

When companies repurchase their own shares, they decrease the number of outstanding stock available, which theoretically increases the stock value. Some investors consider this to be the most tax efficient method of returning cash to shareholders, since there is no tax on repurchasing shares. These investors seem to forget however that the holders of stock who sold to the company end up paying a capital gains tax on their profit. While not all shareholders sell stocks to companies, which are repurchasing their own stock, the ones that do could end up with a higher tax bill at the end of the day, especially if they were long-term buy and hold investors.

One reason for the increased popularity of buybacks is that companies do not wish to commit to a certain dividend level, since their earnings are volatile. Stocks like Exxon Mobil (XOM) didn’t pay a large dividend during the huge run up in oil prices over the past decade, partly because their executives might have believed that once oil prices stabilized, dividends would have had to been cut in order to account for the new reality. It looks like Exxon Mobil (XOM) managers were correct about using caution in expecting the good times to continue indefinitely. Projections for near term earnings per share are to contract by 50% in 2009 before recovering to only two-thirds of the record earnings numbers from 2008. Check my analysis of Exxon Mobil (XOM)

Some analysts believe that companies use share buybacks as a clever way to offset shareholder dilution from exercised stock options from management. With stock repurchases companies fail to reduce share count due to new issuance of stock to redeem employee stock options. Stock buybacks are typically initiated in good times, when stock prices are high and discontinued in bad times, when stock prices are low, Thus, corporations end up purchasing their own stock at inflated prices, which greatly limits the supposed benefits of increasing the ownership percentage of each share owned by stockholders.

General Electric (GE) is a prime example for this. In 2007 the company spend $12.319 billion buying back stock, which reduced the share count from 10394 million to 10218 million, or a decrease of 176 million shares. This comes out to $70/share, whereas the high and low prices of GE stock in 2007 were $42.15 and $34.50 respectively. This sure tells us that the company gave out at least one hundred million shares through option exercises. Facing a liquidity crunch in 2008 the company was forced to sell $12 billion worth of stock at $22.25/share, much lower than the price is had paid for buybacks over the past 4 years. Back in February 2009, the company cut its dividend as well in order to conserve cash.

IBM is another interesting buyback stock to research further. Over the past decade, the worldwide supplier of advanced information processing technology and communication systems and services and program products has managed to decrease the number of shares outstanding from 1.852 billion at the end of 1998 to 1.339 billion by 2008. At the same time revenues have increased by 18.4% from $87.548 billion to $103.63 billion over the past decade. Earnings per share increased by 116.75% from $4.12 to $8.93, mainly due to share buybacks, since net income only rose by 60.4% from $7.692 billion to $12.334 billion in the process. $100 invested in IBM stock at the end of 1998 would now be worth $130.30 with dividends reinvested, and only $117.4 without reinvestment. Dividend payments increased from 0.11/share in 1998, when the yield was a little less than 0.5% to $0.55/share, for a yield of less than 2.1%.
The company has spent $73 billion on share buybacks, which should have been paid out as special dividends instead. This would have increased the total returns for shareholders by rewarding them with a higher dividend payment, the compounding effects of which could have greatly magnified long-term stockholder returns. I am a supporter of the extra cash being paid out as a dividend, since its contribution to the total returns would have been more visible than share buybacks. Check my analysis of International Business Machines (IBM).

Dividends on the other hand are mostly cash in hand that gives the investors options about their further allocation. They could be spent, re-invested in the same or other stocks or could be placed in a savings account. Dividends are somewhat more predictable and reliable sources of income, especially if you are looking for an alternative income stream in retirement. Furthermore, dividends
Dividends have contributed a large portion of total returns to shareholders. They typically account for 40% of average annual total returns each year and are the only form of returns on investment that shareholders achieve during bear markets. The reinvestment of dividends has accounted for majority of S&P 500 total returns as well over the past century.

Companies that regularly pay dividends impose a discipline on managers to treat cash very carefully and thus make better decisions by adopting projects, which would generally improve the bottom line, without sacrificing return on equity.

It would be much easier for an individual who plans on living off their investments to rely solely on dividends that on hoping that share buybacks would lift the value of his or her stocks. Selling your stocks at the midst of a bear market in order to sustain your lifestyle doesn’t make much sense, yet investors keep cheering the supposed “tax efficiency” of stock buybacks.

I typically treat share repurchases the same way as special dividends. Share buybacks are inferior to dividend payments, as they could be canceled or temporary suspended at any moment, without many investors noticing this. Dividend payments on the other hand are visible to shareholders and cutting or eliminating a payment would certainly create negative publicity for the company. I would much rather see special dividends, rather than stock buybacks, which are a clever way to mask the diluting effect of employee option being exercised.

Full Disclosure: None

Relevant Articles:

- Special Dividends Unlock Hidden Value in Stocks

- Dividends and Stock Buybacks in the news

- Dividend Investing vs Trading

- IBM Dividend Stock Analysis

- Exxon Mobil (XOM) Dividend Stock Analysis


5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On June 25, 2009 at 9:08 AM, sagitarius84 (41.04) wrote:

How do you account for stock buybacks in your investment decisions? Do you think share repurchases add value to shareholders?

Report this comment
#2) On June 25, 2009 at 9:34 AM, MattH42004 (28.10) wrote:

The problem with stock buybacks is that they are almost always procyclical. When times are good, cash is flowing, and earnings are rising companies feel comfortable enough to institute large share buybacks. However, when times get hard and earnings fall the shre buyback is usually the first casualty, being suspended in the name of fiscal restraint. Any value investor worth his salt sees how incredibly illogical this is. These companies are doing the exact opposite of what they should do to get maximum benefit from their cash. When they are buying they are often doing it at prices that are at best fairly valued, and probably overvalued. Then, when the truly opportune time comes to maximize value and buy up shares most companies are weeping in the fetal position. Just look at the recent lows. The market tanked almost 60%, down to the inflation adjusted levels of the mid-60's, and what happened? Share buybacks and insider purchases were at historic lows.

Report this comment
#3) On June 25, 2009 at 9:58 AM, SkepticalOx (98.36) wrote:

+1 Rec for Matt (rec'ed your other blog cause you can't rec comments).

Even worse, a lot of these companies buying at the peak borrowed money to do it, putting them in an even WORSE position when the eventual downturn came.

Yes, dividends get cut when a company is in dire straights, but most companies with a strict dividend policy that links to profitability and cash flow usually continue to pay and increase em over time.

Report this comment
#4) On June 25, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Schmacko (91.37) wrote:

I think share buy backs are pretty much worthless for the common investor and their only real purpose is to control the dilution that comes from stock options.  I'd take a high dividend stock with no buyback plan in place over a low/no dividend stock that engages in constant buybacks any day of the week.   Guaranteed money in my pocket is much better than a promise to do something that may or may not actually increase the value of my holdings.

Report this comment
#5) On June 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, kaskoosek (30.23) wrote:

Stock buy backs improve earnings per share.


Stock buy backs are taxed the same way dividends are. The law came 2002, I think. Basically when a company declares to buy shares, this money is taxed.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners