Ellipsis
July 20, 2009
– Comments (35)
The $1.50, $100M rules in the "caps" game should be trashed.
I recently had another look at some of the calls I made in this post of mine.
That list of calls has one advantage. There are no rules. No $1.50, $100M, 200 active calls, U.S. exchanges only limitations, none of that garbage.
Now have a look at some of the results.
I did end some of those calls already but let's just look at the performance between the date of the call and today.
ticker start now rel. change (%)
HGSI 0.50 10.67 2034.00
VVTV 0.27 2.51 829.63
SEH 1.49 11.00 638.26
BGP 0.55 3.98 623.64
CENX 1.11 6.54 489.19
DNDN 4.08 23.32 471.57
IFNNY.PK 0.79 4.00 406.33
BCS 4.13 20.77 402.91
LVS 1.99 9.93 398.99
GMK 0.93 4.61 395.70
FITB 1.46 7.06 383.56
NVAX 0.65 3.01 363.08
STEC 7.60 32.87 332.50
MIC 0.94 3.66 289.36
ACAS 0.75 2.86 281.33
BLC 0.55 2.08 278.18
CSE 1.25 4.39 251.20
FEED 1.68 5.84 247.62
CRAY 2.37 8.23 247.26
ING 3.42 11.47 235.38
EXAS 0.86 2.79 224.42
UIS 0.50 1.62 224.00
BAC 4.02 12.26 204.98
PMI 0.66 2.01 204.55
Most of those stocks were "not currently ratable" at the time of the respective call.
But all kinds of garbage was "currently ratable" at the respective dates. The only problem was that I did not want to make a call on some garbage stock. I just don't find that very "intellectually" satisfying. But I did want to recommend HGSI at $0.50, or Infineon at $0.79.
The $1.50 rule is particularly stupid since the price can be lifted by a split above any threshold.
As usual I could elaborate ...