Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Tak3natheFlood (95.04)

Enterprise Attributes that Build Value: Quality of Earnings

Recs

1

March 29, 2009 – Comments (2) | RELATED TICKERS: RYT , PCR

            A corporation can only be as sound as its customers are financially. Also, a corporation can only be as strong as the necessity for their product or service offered.

            A classic example of a company that achieves both attributes on our quality of earnings checklist is Warren Buffett’s GEICO property. For a little background the Government Employees Insurance Company was founded in 1936 on the assumption that government employees would not only be more responsible drivers (reducing claims) but would also be more credit worthy (increasing revenue predictability). A strong majority of drivers avoid accidents on a yearly basis but still put a significant amount of funds towards the float (which is the premium minus the claims) that can be invested and grown by the company’s management. If you want to study a fantastic business GEICO is a one-stop shop. The premiums are paid on a regular, predictable schedule and are a legal imperative if you want to drive. As Warren Buffett said in his 2008 Annual Report “No one likes to buy auto insurance. But virtually everyone likes to drive.” Combine that necessity with a rock solid customer and you have a business built for long-term success.

            GEICO also doesn’t rely on a small set of customers and doesn’t fall into what many call the 80/20 earnings rule. That is if 80% of your revenues come from 20% of your customers your earnings could be very vulnerable if those customers lost their ability to pay or you lost their loyalty to your product. Companies that have government contracts (Raytheon) or who work on large construction projects (Perini Corp.) can be very susceptible to these dangers. Reaching a wide range of customers therefore is very important. Essentially you’d like customers with steady income streams from stable industries and that function well in a majority of economic climates. The 80/20 rule could also be applied to short-term currency situations as you might not want to be overexposed to a volatile monetary situation which will impair earnings. It’s somewhat safe to say though that currency fluctuations even out over the long-term though.

            One way to achieve this broad based consistent earnings approach is to make a product that is required on a regular basis. We all can probably name some household products or regular services that we receive that could be categorized as necessities. Personal care items, telecommunications, maybe your cable sports programming, prescription drugs, etc. are all solid examples. Any product or service that is bought/paid for on at least a quarterly basis should fall into this prime category for selection.

2 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On March 30, 2009 at 4:36 AM, KamranatUCLA (29.74) wrote:

goverment workers are getting laid off...from DMV to Postal Service.

People have no money anymore and more people will drive without insurance as last resort..like i used to for years when I had little money.

Stop pumping a company that you have no idea about. How do you the insurance money they made was not wasted in stocks like fred and fanny?

Plus everybody cooks the books...even these guys.

What you call a great company can be junk and no one would know it.

This is what angers me. WHY would an insurance company would be in investing business? And now if we get a flood or earthquake government has to bail them out too???

nowadays it seems like everuone is in stock business...even a dentist at the corner...and you will all pay the price if you haven't so yet.

3 years ago I said stocks will be 3000-5000

Now I say stocks will be at 1000-1500 in 2 years. Because of stupid people like you and stobern idiots who don't want to deal with reality.

Reality is many stocks that were 20-50 dollars are now penny stocks or 2-5 dollars and people think they will come up again, or they are too depressed to sell them.

Once they have no bread on the table they will even sell those penny stocks and stocks that are 1-5 dollars.

Then you will see dow at 1000. trust me that day is coming because of liars like you who pump a company without any knowledge.

or wait...maybe you worrk for GEICO? u don't wanna get laid off??

Report this comment
#2) On March 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Tak3natheFlood (95.04) wrote:

This is quite the list of comments so I can only address a few.

First GEICO originally drew a very large majority of its revenues from government employees but the overall driver base has been expanded to place the company as the 3rd largest auto insurer. Personally I don't know what exactly their figures are for government employees but as a percentage of drivers I believe them to be much smaller than in 1936 when the company had almost all of its business in the greater D.C. area.

People still drive and they will for much of the next century. Now I am personally a big fan of public transportation and any alternative transportation but in general the car will be an integral part of our economy for many years to come especially if they finally come out with an electric car that's mass produced, mass marketed with massive appeal. 

Speaking to their investments I'm pretty positive that they have avoided all of the direct risk associated with the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Buffett pulled out of his Fannie Mae investments well over 5 years ago as he saw them chasing quarterly earnings and doing exactly what your talking about. As a note GEICO generates about $10 Billion in operating cash flow for BRK. 

Auto insurance is suspectable to natural disasters but it is the large geographic reach and low risk of wide scale catastrophic events that makes this a very stable company. A company like UVE which is actually one of my caps picks could be considerably riskier as it is a Florida Home Insurance Company. You don't have to be an American Meterological Society member to see some of the problems associated with the sustainability of that business model. 

Speaking to my personal investing style I am a long-term investor. I utilize dividend reinvestment from stable businesses with great brands that still have significant growth opportunities not just now but 5 years or 10 years from now. 

Also I am a student and am not particularly biased towards any particular organization based on employment. Thanks for your thoughts and hopefully I spoke to some of your concerns. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement