Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

MaxTheTerrible (89.20)

ETrade vs. Lohan - conspiracy theory (for entertainment purposes only)

Recs

5

March 10, 2010 – Comments (4) | RELATED TICKERS: ETFC

When I first read about Lindsay Lohan suing ETrade over TV commerical I thought it was nonsense. But then it occured to me - what IF ETrade paid her to do it? To speculate a little more, I think it makes perfect sense for everyone involved. It's really is a win-win situation.

Lohan get the publicity she needs. ETrade bosts its image in the eyes of exhisting and potential customers and essentially gets a lot of free (minus the legal expenses) advertisement. Hell, even the stock may get some boost.

 

4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On March 10, 2010 at 3:43 PM, outoffocus (23.72) wrote:

Maybe TD Ameritrade paid Lindsay Lohan to assassinate the E-trade baby.

Report this comment
#2) On March 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, carcassgrinder (34.87) wrote:

I think the TD Ameritrade guy is selling meth to Lindsay for lap dances.  IMHO.

Report this comment
#3) On March 10, 2010 at 4:36 PM, USNHR (70.08) wrote:

TD Ameritrade guy or the E-trade baby?

Report this comment
#4) On March 10, 2010 at 5:18 PM, dinodelaurentis (67.72) wrote:

Max The Terrible,

      Best post today!!! LOL! I like the way you roll son.

                                  Dino D.

P.S. You're most likely right BTW...

Report this comment

Blog Archive

2011
August (2)
2010
March (1)

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement