Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

XMFSinchiruna (27.70)

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout - $25 Billion or $1 Trillion - I wonder... Remember when we were told the total bill for the entire Iraq War was going to be $80 Billion??

Recs

31

July 23, 2008 – Comments (9)

July 22 (Bloomberg) -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $25 billion over two years under a Bush administration plan to rescue the mortgage-finance companies, the Congressional Budget Office said.

While the assessment is more pessimistic than Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's prediction that a bailout is unlikely, the CBO report may quell concerns among some lawmakers that the price tag would be higher.

There is probably a ``better than 50 percent'' [Cool... we're facing about the same odds as we would at a roullette table] chance taxpayer funds won't be needed to save the two largest mortgage- finance providers, though ``that scenario is far from the only possible result,'' said the CBO, a nonpartisan agency in Washington that provides economic and budget analysis for lawmakers, said in a report today.

``Many analysts and traders believe that there is a significant likelihood that conditions in the housing and financial markets could deteriorate more than already reflected'' in the companies' finances, the CBO said. ``Such continuing problems would increase the probability that this new authority would have to be used.''

While neither the Treasury nor the White House budget office has estimated publicly the cost of a bailout, lawmakers including Senators Jon Tester of Montana and Richard Shelby of Alabama said last week they were concerned the cost could reach $1 trillion. The CBO said it reached its assessment by taking into account the probability of various outcomes.

Helping the Markets

Paulson said today he anticipated legislation will be passed this week to authorize his July 13 request for authority to extend credit to the mortgage-finance companies or take an equity stake. Lawmakers have negotiated with Paulson over the details, with the goal of putting the package to a vote in the House of Representatives tomorrow. The Senate would also need to vote.

Paulson has said the plan alone would restore investor confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee almost half the $12 trillion in U.S. home loans outstanding, and thereby pose little cost to taxpayers. [Are you kidding me???  While they are authorizing a blank check to guarantee two enormous failing institutions they have the gaul to say it poses little cost to taxpayers?????????????????? He said the Treasury has no plans to execute the financial backstop plan, and added that if it did so, he would consult with Congress and the companies.

``This is about not only our housing markets, but it's about our capital markets more broadly,'' Paulson, 62, said today in a Bloomberg Television interview. ``This goes well beyond the two institutions -- Fannie and Freddie -- it has to do with investors in the United States and investors all over the world.''

Little Choice

Congress may have little choice but to sign off on Paulson's request because the financial markets are already pricing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's debt securities as if the rescue plan will become law. If Congress doesn't approve the bill, it would devastate the markets, CBO Director Peter Orszag said today.

``It is arguable that if it was not enacted at this point, the consequences would be severe,'' Orszag told reporters at a briefing in Washington today.

Fannie Mae, based in Washington, fell $1.50, or 11 percent, to $12.63 at 3:06 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac dropped 44 cents, or 5 percent, to $8.31.

The CBO estimate includes the likelihood that losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won't worsen and the government plan will prove unnecessary, the CBO said in a report today.

``The CBO report is sure to be utilized by politicians on both sides of the aisle, with opponents pointing to the hefty cost, and supporters pointing to the sub-50 percent odds placed on the likelihood of those costs ever being realized,'' said Tony Crescenzi, the chief bond strategist at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York.

Pretty Small

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, a Democrat from North Dakota, called the estimate ``good news.'' He said the CBO assessment will be ``very helpful to those who want to advance this legislation.''

Tester, a Democrat, said during a July 15 Senate Banking Committee hearing he was concerned the government would be ``potentially spending $1 trillion.''

``A lot of people thought it would be much higher,'' Shelby told reporters today, referring to the CBO estimate. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd of Connecticut also said he was among those expecting a bigger number. ``It's two months in Iraq'' he said. ``The number is certainly one that doesn't shock me given the authority that's being requested.''

Skepticism

Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, said the CBO estimate is ``lower than most people expected'' yet contradicts the Treasury Department's ``best case scenario analyses'' that the bailout won't cost taxpayers anything.

Senator Jim Bunning, a Kentucky Republican who argued with Paulson at a congressional hearing last week over the bailout's potential costs, rejected the CBO estimate as too low. ``I don't believe a word of it,'' he said.

Heather Wong, a spokeswoman for House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, called the CBO's analysis ``very encouraging.'' She said that ``we especially like that there is less than a 50 percent chance that it will be used.''

The Bush administration is depending on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to help pull the U.S. out of the worst housing slump since the Great Depression. The companies, which buy mortgages from banks, face mounting credit losses stemming from the collapse of the subprime-mortgage market.

CBO numbers assume Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won't exceed the $85 billion in fair value losses on their balance sheets, agency officials told reporters in Washington today. The CBO said today it's taking into account an almost 5 percent chance credit losses may reach $100 billion.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Faler in Washington at bfaler@bloomberg.net; Dawn Kopecki in Washington at dkopecki@bloomberg.net.

 

9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On July 23, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Richthofen80 (87.15) wrote:

Paulson has said the plan alone would restore investor confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,

Ha. Investors aren't confident because Fannie and Freddie are LOSING MONEY. What does the stock price matter unless these companies are going to announce huge losses and need to raise capital? It doesn't. Paulson is posturing. Fannie and Freddie are insolvent, at some point they won't be able to borrow and they'll need to tap into uncle sam's deep pocket. What a load of garbage. I hate the government.

Report this comment
#2) On July 23, 2008 at 7:42 AM, wrote:

hi dude nice blog

Report this comment
#3) On July 23, 2008 at 8:53 AM, devoish (98.66) wrote:

I have been told the estimate for losses is projected out until the end of 2009, at which time the proposal expires. It does not include estimates of losses for after that when it has to be renewed to continue saving the world financial system.

Regards,

devoish

Who remembers when the Iraqis would be happy to pay us in oil to come destroy their country.

Report this comment
#4) On July 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, FleaBagger (29.25) wrote:

Yet another reason to own gold and silver...

Report this comment
#5) On July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Imperial1964 (97.77) wrote:

"CBO numbers assume Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won't exceed the $85 billion in fair value losses on their balance sheets, agency officials told reporters in Washington today."

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that statement.

Report this comment
#6) On July 23, 2008 at 12:00 PM, DemonDoug (80.36) wrote:

"The CBO said today it's taking into account an almost 5 percent chance credit losses may reach $100 billion."

I'd be willing to bet everything I own including all my organs and my life that there is a 100% chance real credit losses will be way over 100 billion; however I would not be surprised if those losses aren't reported or get pushed to the future 5-10 years.

I'm with everyone else... this is extremely bullish on gold and silver, bearish for government transparency and honesty, and the markets are so obviously being short-term manipulated that, while I'm not crying, I'm definitely not laughing.

Report this comment
#7) On July 23, 2008 at 1:41 PM, EnigmaDude (92.95) wrote:

Good thing Congress passed a bill to reform GSE last year.  Otherwise, things would have gotten really out of control!

Oh yeah - it also provides for "affordable housing" for years to come, and not at taxpayers' expense:

"... the bill creates an off budget and non-taxpayer financed affordable housing fund, which will dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars for the construction, maintenance and preservation of affordable housing with the first year of the fund to be dedicated to the hurricane stricken areas of the Gulf Coast, and billions of dollars over the next five years for affordable housing nationwide."

(I think I will keep renting my home)

And I bought more shares of UXG today!

Report this comment
#8) On July 23, 2008 at 6:42 PM, eldemonio (98.83) wrote:

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are leveraged up the a$$.  I remember reading that they have about 100 billion of capital to cover the over 5 trillion of owned or guaranteed mortgages.  Being leveraged 50 to 1?  WTF? 

I am tired of hearing about what will happen if we don't bail out Fannie and Freddie - fuqem.  Right now, I am willing to cut off my nose to spite my face.  I am willing to suffer the consequences of the four financial horsemen, bring on financial armageddon!

 

Report this comment
#9) On July 24, 2008 at 7:16 AM, TMFDeej (99.43) wrote:

Amen Sinc.  I completely agree.  I plan on writing some more on Fannie and Freddie later on today in my blog.  This is a complete mess.  As hard as it is to believe, I'm even more bearish on the dollar today than I was at the beginning of the year.

Deej 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement