Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

XMFSinchiruna (27.75)

FYI: Today's WHO Swine Flu press release

Recs

11

June 11, 2009 – Comments (2)

The latest H1N1 press release from the WHO ... FYI

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html

The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.

We are in the earliest days of the pandemic. The virus is spreading under a close and careful watch.

No previous pandemic has been detected so early or watched so closely, in real-time, right at the very beginning. The world can now reap the benefits of investments, over the last five years, in pandemic preparedness.

We have a head start. This places us in a strong position. But it also creates a demand for advice and reassurance in the midst of limited data and considerable scientific uncertainty.

Thanks to close monitoring, thorough investigations, and frank reporting from countries, we have some early snapshots depicting spread of the virus and the range of illness it can cause.

We know, too, that this early, patchy picture can change very quickly. The virus writes the rules and this one, like all influenza viruses, can change the rules, without rhyme or reason, at any time.

Globally, we have good reason to believe that this pandemic, at least in its early days, will be of moderate severity. As we know from experience, severity can vary, depending on many factors, from one country to another.

On present evidence, the overwhelming majority of patients experience mild symptoms and make a rapid and full recovery, often in the absence of any form of medical treatment.

Worldwide, the number of deaths is small. Each and every one of these deaths is tragic, and we have to brace ourselves to see more. However, we do not expect to see a sudden and dramatic jump in the number of severe or fatal infections.

We know that the novel H1N1 virus preferentially infects younger people. In nearly all areas with large and sustained outbreaks, the majority of cases have occurred in people under the age of 25 years.

In some of these countries, around 2% of cases have developed severe illness, often with very rapid progression to life-threatening pneumonia.

Most cases of severe and fatal infections have been in adults between the ages of 30 and 50 years.

This pattern is significantly different from that seen during epidemics of seasonal influenza, when most deaths occur in frail elderly people.

Many, though not all, severe cases have occurred in people with underlying chronic conditions. Based on limited, preliminary data, conditions most frequently seen include respiratory diseases, notably asthma, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, and obesity.

At the same time, it is important to note that around one third to half of the severe and fatal infections are occurring in previously healthy young and middle-aged people.

Without question, pregnant women are at increased risk of complications. This heightened risk takes on added importance for a virus, like this one, that preferentially infects younger age groups.

Finally, and perhaps of greatest concern, we do not know how this virus will behave under conditions typically found in the developing world. To date, the vast majority of cases have been detected and investigated in comparatively well-off countries.

Let me underscore two of many reasons for this concern. First, more than 99% of maternal deaths, which are a marker of poor quality care during pregnancy and childbirth, occurs in the developing world.

Second, around 85% of the burden of chronic diseases is concentrated in low- and middle-income countries.

Although the pandemic appears to have moderate severity in comparatively well-off countries, it is prudent to anticipate a bleaker picture as the virus spreads to areas with limited resources, poor health care, and a high prevalence of underlying medical problems.

Ladies and gentlemen,

A characteristic feature of pandemics is their rapid spread to all parts of the world. In the previous century, this spread has typically taken around 6 to 9 months, even during times when most international travel was by ship or rail.

Countries should prepare to see cases, or the further spread of cases, in the near future. Countries where outbreaks appear to have peaked should prepare for a second wave of infection.

Guidance on specific protective and precautionary measures has been sent to ministries of health in all countries. Countries with no or only a few cases should remain vigilant.

Countries with widespread transmission should focus on the appropriate management of patients. The testing and investigation of patients should be limited, as such measures are resource intensive and can very quickly strain capacities.

WHO has been in close dialogue with influenza vaccine manufacturers. I understand that production of vaccines for seasonal influenza will be completed soon, and that full capacity will be available to ensure the largest possible supply of pandemic vaccine in the months to come.

Pending the availability of vaccines, several non-pharmaceutical interventions can confer some protection.

WHO continues to recommend no restrictions on travel and no border closures.

Influenza pandemics, whether moderate or severe, are remarkable events because of the almost universal susceptibility of the world’s population to infection.

We are all in this together, and we will all get through this, together.

Thank you.

2 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On June 11, 2009 at 9:52 PM, angusthermopylae (39.66) wrote:

I'm just a regular guy, not the CDC or a doctor, but I would propose that we are actually 2-4 months into a pandemic.  The definition that keeps getting put forth is a rapid outbreak in two or more countries in a short period of time.

Last I saw, the flu was in 74 countries...and the WHO and CDC have been criticized about not calling a pandemic earlier.

This is actually good news, in a sick sort of way---the "pandemic" part is well underway, but there isn't widespread death and destruction...and probably won't be until/unless the virus changes significantly.  (Not "Mad Max" or "I Am Legend" scenarios...)  That means that the disease isn't really going to wipe out humanity too quickly or unexpectedly.

Also, if it ever does get really dangerous, I would bet that anyone who has survived the milder form will probably have some immunity, a la cow pox vs. smallpox.  Again, I'm just a layman, but at this point I'm not heading for my fortress on Skullcrusher Mountain just yet.

As far as investing, I would think that the next week or so will see big pushes for pharmaceuticals and hospital equipment manufacturers on the plus side.  The summer movie season is getting underway--not sure what will happen there.  Perhaps a lower-than-expected quarter for Ticketmaster and its brethren?

Report this comment
#2) On June 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Seano67 (86.40) wrote:

Some of those very highly specualtive biopharmaceutical stocks shot right through the roof today, I'm assuming based on this news. I dunno whether any of them make for a very good investment at this point though. Had you been in beforehand, then yeah. But that may have been your prime opportunity at this bounce.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement