February 17, 2009
– Comments (6)
Look at GDX, GLD, GOLD, RGLD, NG, UXG
Big hitters are pouring money into Gold.
Gold Soars to Highest Since July.
A Wall Street Journal headline proclaims:
Gold is Flirting with $1,000, Again; ‘There’s No Sign of the Market Tiring.’
On Wednesday, gold surged another $30 an ounce, surpassing $930 and now, the mainstream media is getting on board in a big way.
We can spend all day debating whether this is the time gold runs back to $1,000 and beyond, or whether this is just another short-lived bounce which could run out of steam at any moment. Frankly, the exceptional volatility of the gold market has taught me that only time will tell.
What I can tell you is that there has recently been a change in gold - a dramatic change -at least the perception of gold. This change could set gold and gold stocks on a long march higher, yet, the mainstream media have completely glossed over it. Let me explain.
Gold Goes Big
You see, gold’s a funny thing. It elicits such an emotional response. Gold has had a pretty volatile year. In 2007, the yellow metal started attracting a lot of attention when it passed the highs set in the early 80s and has been up and down since, although lately, it has had more ups than downs. Despite all the recent attention, we’re right back where we were a year ago, when gold passed the $900 mark.
Whether you’re an all out “gold bug” who has been waiting a long time for this run, you question the value of gold because it has very little industrial use (ala Warren Buffett), or somewhere in between, you’ve got to take a look at what has happened to gold in the past few weeks.
But here’s the thing, this time around there’s interest from some very big money investors, as it is now considering gold to be a viable investment again. It’s not just the hyperactive, hot money hedge funds batting around gold anymore. Now pension funds, mutual funds, and other institutional investors are betting on gold – in a big way.
That is the big difference this time around. The big money interest hasn’t been there for decades, and it looks like that’s quickly starting to change.
Big Money Bets on Gold
Unprecedented sums of money have been pouring into gold in the past few months. While many funds are licking their wounds from the recent downturn and facing ongoing redemptions, some still have money. Those that do are at least putting some of it, into gold.
Just look at the recent money, which has been put into gold companies across the board. They’re all getting new cash. Major miners looking for extra cash to fund takeovers, exploration, and mine development, along with small gold companies looking for one more financing to put themselves into production, are all getting it. There’s money out there for gold.
For instance, Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM) is expecting at least $1.7 billion (or more depending on the final terms of agreement) in new cash in its coffers. The cash infusion will come from the sale of stock and convertible notes. That’s billion – with a ‘B.’
Leading the charge in putting this financing together was Citigroup (C), J.P. Morgan (JPM), and the Bank of Montreal (BMO). They’re the big money, and except for BMO, they wouldn’t have given gold the time of day when private equity players were chasing after real estate, Chinese companies, and other “hot” sectors over the past few years.
Of course, it’s not just one big deal though. It’s lots of them. Industrials may be going under because they can’t get financing, but when it comes to gold companies, suddenly, there appears to be plenty of available money. Over the past few months, there have been a slew of financings of gold companies. Yamana (NYSE:AUY), Agnico-Eagle (NYSE:AEM), and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC), combined have attracted more than $800 million in new money.
Even gold companies, which were pretty much left for dead during the credit crunch are getting the cash they need. Shares of Osisko Mining [TSX:OSK] dropped well below $2 per share in November amid concerns the company wouldn’t be able to get the cash necessary to move forward with its prospective gold mine. Three months later, its shares are trading above C$4 after hitting highs of over C$5 per share, and it now has the money it needs. NovaGold (AMEX:NG) went through a similar ordeal. Its shares dropped all the way to $0.37 only to climb back to close at $3.52, on Wednesday.
These are just some of the bigger deals. We could highlight the dozens of smaller deals which are or are about to get some new capital, but you get the point. There’s big money backing gold now. In a way, the whole gold situation may have changed.
A “Frightening” Change
Two weeks ago Peter Munk, the Chairman of Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX) – the world’s largest gold mining company – identified an “unpleasant and frightening” trend. In an interview with Bloomberg, Munk said:
He has received an increasing number of calls from wealthy investors looking for ways to buy bullion. While that is positive for the metal market, it is a “sad part of a civilized society.”
“That’s not where you want to be, it’s alarming. Do I personally believe gold will break through $1,000? It’s not a question of if; it’s a question of how soon.”
You’ve got to remember that Munk is the chairman and founder of a gold company, so he has a lot of experience in gold. He has access to the inner workings of the gold market, and benefits from rising gold prices, as well.
Despite the potential conflict of interest, he is definitely correct in saying that change has taken place.
What Really Matters About Gold
As long time Prosperity Dispatch readers know, I hate talking about gold. When it comes to gold, everyone has an opinion, and it’s usually a very strong one, as there’s very little middle ground when it comes to gold.
Just to be clear though, I’m not a gold bug. I’m not about to predict gold is going to $1,000 before it goes to $800, as there are just too many variables driving gold lately. I think a world with $200 gold is a much better place to live in than a world with $2,000 gold, but the recent big money push into gold could mark a significant change in the prospects for gold.
In the end, it all comes down to whatever the markets believe. Perception is reality, and a lot of money is betting gold will be perceived as more dearly down the road, whether deflation or inflation, wins out.
Over the past few months, deflation vs. inflation has been a popular subject of debate. While $60 trillion of wealth has been wiped out in this downturn, central banks are going all out to print enough new money to prevent the inevitable deflationary effects of the losses. And as we’ve noted before, all speculative bubble-booms end in deflation.
That doesn’t matter now. The current theory is gold will win either way - deflation or inflation, it doesn’t matter. Gold wins during inflation because it’s a store of value, and it wins in deflation as central banks debase their currency. As a result, there’s demand from both the inflation and deflation camps. In the end, the perception of value is what really matters for gold (and every other financial asset for that matter).
For decades, the big money refused to view gold as anything other than something horded by conspiracy theorists. The lack of big money interest was a huge hurdle for gold. Now, with the billions of dollars headed into gold from leading U.S. institutions, it appears the hurdle may have finally been passed.
Mark O’Byrne notes – see here -- that predictions of $1,000 an ounce gold were laughed at in 2001, but no one’s laughing now. And $5,000 an ounce by 2013 might seem laughable today, except that the man making the prediction is Rob McEwen, founder of Goldcorp, the world’s second-largest gold mining company by market cap.
According to McEwen, “I realized in August 2007 we had reached an inflection point regarding money; it was all about protecting money, and gold served that purpose.”
Via Stock Research Portal Blog
EHoyle, I appreciate the information, but doesn't the fact that the 2013 price is quoted by an obviously biased person make it laughable?
I suppose I still struggle with why people want gold. It doesn't serve any real purpose anymore. When was the last time you used gold to buy your groceries, or even a big ticket item like a house? The "gold standard" seems a bit arbitrary. Why not the silver standard or the copper standard or platinum? If people have less dollars to exchange for a bar of gold, won't it be worth less than it is today? The run-up seems fueled by an uneducated "flock to security". It will be interesting to see what happens if people figure out gold is not intrinsically more secure than many other metals. It seems very similar to the Dot-Com or Housing bubble. Things are worth more than their intrinsic value, until they suddenly aren't.
This gold debate will probably still be going on when gold is at $1200/oz.
You don't have to like gold, but the facts are: it IS used as a currency, the financial system is seriously ill, and because of that a lot of people are hedging (or more) with gold. Gold will eventually go down, so you have to know when to get out, or just get out after you've made some money.
I've heard all the arguments and seen all the charts about how bad gold is. Fine. All that might work eventually, but it wasn't working at $750/oz, and it's not working today. Maybe tomorrow.
Among the "uneducated flock" to gold, are some pretty smart and respected people.
TOLD YAH with my blog last week entitled " Oil is kinda squishy while gold I can heat up and place in a blanky." The point I was trying to make that in scary times gold is the world's security blanket. Is this right or wrong? Don't know but I know its true.
Watch Gold Crash on Wed. after today's big up day. But longterm its a buy after tomorrow's crash.
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by