Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Gold Standard? That's For Wusses. Real Men Use Plutonium

Recs

12

April 01, 2009 – Comments (4)

Given the currrent shenanigans going on with our currency, a return to a metallic standard has been mentioned by many commentators. Gold is the obvious choice, but it is relatively rare and there just isn't enough of it in the world to form a usable currency. Likewise gold and silver have been proposed, but bi-metallic standards always sink of the reef of arbitrage. It just can't be made to work.

So I propose the macho metallic standard. Plutonium.

We could use coinage with a milligram of Pu 239 as the dollar equivalent. The ten dollar coin would have 10 milligrams and the hundred dollar coin 100 milligrams. Pu 239 is an alpha emitter, so think of how macho it would be to have a handful of those coins in your front pocket, right next to the umm, equipment. Toting around a kilogram of Pu would not only be dangerous, but you'd be lugging around a cool million dollars!

One of the nice things about the Pu standard is that it can be made to order in a breeder reactor, so we can make electric power and money at the same time. And we can do it out of U 238, which isn't very valuable anyways. This is a win/win/win situation!

Banking would suddenly be up there in the dangerous job sweepstakes like lumberjacking or crab fishing. Have a big influx of coinage? We think the vault is sub-critical, but is it really? How many ingots can we pile up on a pallet before stuff starts to happen?

Being rich would also be much more macho. Those home safes would have to be radiation hardened as well hardened against thieves. You can have all the cash you want, just don't put it all in the same place.

So who's joining me in the new macho metallic standard, the Plutonium standard!

4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On April 01, 2009 at 2:16 PM, dudemonkey (58.42) wrote:

Also this would make the early scenes of Back to the Future make more sense.

Report this comment
#2) On April 01, 2009 at 2:40 PM, MikeMark (30.22) wrote:

Like, radioactive man!

Report this comment
#3) On April 01, 2009 at 3:35 PM, arboretum (28.81) wrote:

Hmmm.

Can just see what happens when the UN tries to get Iran to hand over it's foreign currency reserves.

Report this comment
#4) On April 08, 2009 at 11:04 AM, TMEBenBenBen (< 20) wrote:

nice.

One little technical point.

Alphas, even very high energy alphas, would almost never penetrate your skin, so if it is in your pocket, your equipment needn't be concerned due to the proximity of an alpha emiter.  They use alpha emiters in smoke detectors, because the smoke stops the alphas, which creates a signal for the alarm Americurium 241 was what they use to use and it emits a  strong alpha.  Alphas are dangerous when inhaled or ingested, extreme concentration of damage due to very localized inonizing radiation makes for serious problems quickly.

Of course the fact that plutonium is highly toxic and will oxidize is a problem if it is in your pocket, or aywhere near your breathing space....so yes,yery macho men of very few words would handle these coins.

 

How about Cobalt 60?  A strong combined gamma and beta emitter, that would give people a deep 'sunburn', and the sensation tingling of heat if they held onto their cash too long... forcing them to spend spend spend.

It might not burn a hole in your pocket, but it could burn a hole in your leg.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement