Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

XMFHelical (< 20)

Healthcare Hearings Today



March 26, 2012 – Comments (3) | RELATED TICKERS: ANTM , UNH , AET

Today is the start of the arguments before the Supreme Court regarding 'Obama Care', i.e. the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).  As someone running a healthcare sector investment portfolio, there is little more important than considering the outcome here.  The key consideration that will be heard is the requirement for an individual mandate, but before this can be heard, the court needs to decide whether they are yet allowed to hear on it (yeah, law is like that sometimes).  NPR summarized this nicely today.

4 Questions that could Make or Break the Health Care Law

In the Helical protfolio, the holding most teetering on the eventual outcome here is insurer Wellpoint, though most all have an interest.  Without the expected influx of insurees, some of the other considerations of PPACA could get really burdensome.  These include the inability to deny pre-existing conditions and the removal of the insurance cap.  Without the mandate, many could simply wait until they find themselves ill to obtain coverage.  Should the law stick, the larger insurers are almost certainly best positioned to benefit from the creation of health insurance exchanges that each state will need to set up.  Currently Wellpoint is ~10% of the Helical Port, perhaps a bit high for such a binary risk consideration, but a risk with which I'm currnetly comofrotable.

While very politicized right now, the judges could well take a more non-partisan approach to the mandate, assuming they decide they can consider it before it takes effect.  After all, the idea for an individual mandate was originally a Republican one.

For investors, any event of a binary nature, as this could be, is likely to provide both opportunity and volatility.


Home Coverage Fool


3 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On March 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, XMFHelical (< 20) wrote:

Summary of the day, again from NPR.

Sounds like we are likely to get to the meat of this case.

Report this comment
#2) On March 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM, leohaas (29.78) wrote:

If the penalty for not getting healt insurance is indeed a tax, then Federal law prohibits any person from filing suit until they are actually penalized. The Supreme Court may use this argument to punt on the real question: is the mandate constitutional?

Report this comment
#3) On March 28, 2012 at 11:27 AM, XMFHelical (< 20) wrote:


Exactly right, but I doubt they will do so.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners