Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

TroyLau (< 20)

How to completely outperform the market by... buying high?

Recs

8

April 24, 2011 – Comments (8) | RELATED TICKERS: BERK

http://thequantinvestor.blogspot.com/ 

 

Investing 101 tells you to, 'Buy low and sell high', and there are many, many investors who live by this motto. But is there any truth to it? Or perhaps, might you be better off buying high and selling higher? In this post I'll try to answer that very question by back testing a strategy that goes against that motto.

 

What I've done is taken all three major exchanges, over the past ten years, and implemented a strategy where I buy any stock that is at a 52 week high. After a certain amount of time I sell it, and perhaps buy it right back if it is again at a 52 week high. I've tested this method over 1, 3, 6, and 12 month holding times for each exchange. To calculate the average return I used the geometric mean to properly account for any volatility.

 

What I find is quite impressive. In fact, a strategy of buying every stock that is at a 52 week high completely outperformed the market, regardless of how long it is held. For comparison, over the past ten years the Nasdaq has gained 33%, the S&P has gained 2% and the illustrious Berkshire Hathaway A has risen a mere 80%

 

So here you go... the performance of the 'buy high' strategy for different holding periods.

 

 

1 Month Hold

                 10 Year performance       Avg. Return

 NYSE                   230%                     0.7%

 Nasdaq                230%                     0.7%

 Amex                   290%                     0.9%


3 Month Hold

                 10 Year performance       Avg. Return

NYSE                    280%                     2.6%

Nasdaq                 280%                     2.6%

Amex                    290%                     2.7%

 

6 Month Hold

                 10 Year performance       Avg. Return

 NYSE                   245%                     3.8%

 Nasdaq                212%                     3.2%

 Amex                   177%                     2.4%

 

12 Month Hold

                 10 Year performance       Avg. Return

 NYSE                   209%                     7.7%

 Nasdaq                158%                     4.7%

 Amex                   167%                     5.3%

 

An important consideration with each of these strategies are the hidden costs associated with things like commissions. While a 1 or 3 month hold may provide the best returns, you will also be paying significantly more commissions than with a 6 month or 1 year hold strategy. With that in mind I would claim that the 6 month hold strategy is the best, but that depends on what percentage of your investment your commissions take up.

 

Of course there are no promises of this strategy working over the next ten years, this is just something for you to consider. This strategy also won't make you a millionaire (unless you started with 1/2 a million dollars), but instead seems to be a nice way to slowly grow your money.

 

********************************

The analysis was run with a new upgrade of my code. It now takes less than one minute to back test a trading strategy over ten years on all three exchanges! With this in mind I invite my readers to propose new trading strategies that I can test and report the performance of on my blog. http://thequantinvestor.blogspot.com/

8 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On April 25, 2011 at 12:40 AM, buffalonate (96.52) wrote:

That is a pretty good idea because it guarantees you have a good company.  I would wait for those companies identified to pull back before I bought into them. 

Report this comment
#2) On April 25, 2011 at 7:11 AM, TMFAleph1 (86.20) wrote:

You don't say what your selling rule is -- that's the key to the strategy.

Alex Dumortier

Report this comment
#3) On April 25, 2011 at 11:01 AM, chk999 (99.99) wrote:

What's the rule on position sizing and what do you do if only a few (or none) companies meet the buy rule? What is the strategy in a bear market?

This is interesting, but it is a momentum strategy and those tend to get ugly in down markets. 

Report this comment
#4) On April 26, 2011 at 9:01 AM, TroyLau (< 20) wrote:

The stretegy is simple...sell after that time NO MATTER WHAT.  In the future I'll look at more creative strategies like stop losses and whatnot. And I totally agree with #3 ....but what long strategy didn't get ugly during the recession...

Report this comment
#5) On April 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, piggy60 (< 20) wrote:

How dows this work if you apply it to stocks trading at their 52 week lows?

Report this comment
#6) On April 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, piggy60 (< 20) wrote:

How does this work if you apply it to stocks trading at their 52 week lows?

Report this comment
#7) On April 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, TMFAleph1 (86.20) wrote:

The stretegy is simple...sell after that time NO MATTER WHAT.

After what time?

Report this comment
#8) On April 27, 2011 at 9:28 PM, TroyLau (< 20) wrote:

hi piggy60..se my newest blog for that very answer!

 

TMFBullnBear - I'd reccomend reading my post again 

Report this comment

Blog Archive

2011
May (3) April (5) March (6)

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement