Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Imagination is More Important then Knowledge

Recs

8

November 11, 2008 – Comments (8) | RELATED TICKERS: SKF

I added a couple more groupies, so a quick brief:

Aresfinancial is a shameless point chaser, does not care much about accuracy. He is currently #1 in CAPS with 11k points.

abitarePERFECT is a pure bear, cares about accuracy, etc…. he is #7 out of 60k

abitarecatania is on updown.com ranking: #30 of 102129
YTD is 178% at updown.com (I will try and post the portfolio, as soon as I can learn to embed)

CAPS is primarily a stock watch list and a sounding board for ideas. I typically only hold 2 - 5 stocks in my portfolio. I am leveraged short this market and might be for years….

BREAK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Imagination is more important then knowledge – Albert Einstein

My narrative/imagination is different, then most money managers etc.... IMO, we are in Black Swan territory here, everyone is just guessing going forward. Many Fools know my narrative, so I will provide another’s narrative:

A narrative from James Kunstler at: http://jameshowardkunstler.typepad.com/

        As the election campaign ground on like a 3000-mile race between a greyhound and an armadillo, the media kept harping on Barack Obama's vague promises of "change." We now know what the main promise was: regime change, right here in the USA, not in some place where the natives wear strange headgear. Mr. Obama's victory was a moment of epochal exhilaration, not least because he appears to be a decent and intelligent person self-made from a humble background -- someone who has personally bought tube socks in the K-mart, worried about money, and made many trips in a subway car.


        The current occupant of the White House, however, has sedulously prepared for his successor the biggest sh_t sandwich the world has ever seen, and there is naturally some concern that Mr. Obama might choke on it. The dilemma is essentially this: the consumer economy we all knew and loved has died. There will be pressure from nearly every quarter to keep it hooked up to the costly life support machines even though it is dead. A different economy is waiting to be born, but it is nothing like the one that has died. The economy-to-come is one of rigor and austerity. It is not the kind of thing that a nation of overfed clowns is used to. Do we even have a prayer of getting to it, or are we going to squander our dwindling resources on life support for something that is already dead?

     A case in point: the car industry. The Big Three, all functionally bankrupt, are now lined up for bail-outs from the treasury's bottomless checking account. Personally, I believe the age of Happy Motoring is over. Many Americans have already bought their last car -- they just don't know it yet. The current low-ish price of oil is a total fake-out, having to do much more with asset-dumping in the paper markets than the true resource supply-demand equation. Most of the world (the media for sure) has ignored preliminary leaks from the International Energy Agency's (IEA) forthcoming report which forecasts global oil depletion to be 9.1 percent in 2009. This is a staggering figure, very likely to offset whatever slack we see in global demand from the worldwide economic crisis. In fact, the global oil markets are poised for the most severe dislocations ever seen, meaning it's a toss-up what happens first in the USA: a major leg back up in oil prices, or shortages, hoarding, and rationing.

          For my money (literally) there are only two main reasons that any portion of the car industry should be rescued at the present time: one, because we need somebody to manufacture engines for military vehicles, and two, because we need somebody to manufacture rolling stock for the revival in passenger railroad service that will have to be a centerpiece of the future economy if we want to remain a civilized nation.

         Even the progressive factions of the public may be in for much more "change" than they bargained for. The global economy as we knew it is finished (despite British PM Gordon Brown's fatuous suggestion that we are ready to formalize it). The world is about to lose its "flatness" (sorry Tom Friedman) and get much rounder. For one thing, the racket of American "consumers" gobbling up the output of Asian factories in exchange for paper promises is over. For the moment, the Chinese are struggling with epic factory closures with the sudden prospect of a restive lumpenproletariet. The situation there is bound to get worse. Before long, these broke-and-hungry masses may actually challenge the present government. In the meantime, there's no telling what the (unelected) Chinese government might do either to keep itself in power, or genuinely defend its country's perceived economic interests. One thing is self-evident: we are not returning to the old racket of toys-for-treasury-bills. One thing China might do in economic self-defense is shed whatever US dollar-denominated paper is moldering in their vaults before it becomes valueless altogether.


      As global trade relations wither, and they will, the US will be thrust back on its own devices, at the same time that oil resources grow punishingly scarce. Mr. Obama will have to contend with the necessary radical reform of all the activities necessary for daily life here. Near the top of the list -- invisible to most of the public so far -- will be the question of how we produce the food we need. Industrial farming is done, just as suburbia is toast. Mr. Obama will have to apply plenty of ass-time to the first stages of negotiating this bottleneck. I don't even know what he can do policy-wise, though he can certainly make it plain to the public that we have to grow more of our food close to home and do it with fewer engines and fewer oil-based soil supplements. It is a problem of such surpassing difficulty that it was not even close to being in the election arena. The transition will probably occur by means of "emergence." Self-evident necessity will prompt different behavior and different ways of doing things. Sooner or later, the new arrangements will self-organize -- if we don't squander resources defending an unsustainable status quo. One thing we can certainly predict is that growing our food will require more human labor and attention -- meaning there will be plenty of work for people currently losing their jobs at The Footlocker and Arby's, but it's far from certain whether they will be happy in their new vocations.

         We're going to have to resume making things in the USA again, too, probably at a more modest scale, and probably fewer things than we are used to. We have no idea yet how this is going to happen. Like agriculture, manufacturing culture may have to return, if at all, emergently, as individuals and communities see opportunity in advantages like proximity to water-power and water transport. My guess is that corporate enterprise as we have known it -- at the continental and global scale -- is done for. I would not bet on any of the Fortune 500 carrying on the manufacturing work of the future using the plants-and-equipment that are familiar to them. The manufacturing of the future may be more like cottage industry than Proctor and Gamble. Yet, obviously, there will be tremendous efforts to prop up failing corporate enterprise and prevent natural bankruptcies from occurring.

        Similarly, the retail part of the economy. Many observers think that Wal-Mart and its clones are immune to the larger forces swirling around us. Just because many cash-strapped people are hunting for bargains at WalMart these days does not insure the survival of the Big Box model very far into the future. In fact, in every trend we can see -- from the oil markets to events in China to the impoverishment of the US working class to the coming crisis in truck transport -- you can easily discern fatal weaknesses in this model. Local retail (and its support structures) is coming back. We just don't know how, yet, and we don't know how much capital and effort will be squandered trying to rescue WalMart, when the time comes. But the imperative re-scaling of commerce in America also represents huge opportunities for young people to get into their own businesses.
Mr. Obama will preside over the potential restructuring of all our systems, some of them in ways he and his supporters have not imagined. We haven't begun to see where fate will take higher education, but my guess is that it will no longer be a "consumer" activity, and that the hypertrophied land-grant diploma mills will have to to shrink or die as state financial support withers away, and all sorts of unnecessary professions from "public relations" to "marketing" cease to require certified graduates. The luxurious central high schools, utterly addicted to their yellow school bus fleets, will be left as a problem for the states and municipalities. I don't believe they can be rescued, and they are already failing in many other ways, not least, educating and properly socializing young humans.

       In the months just ahead, Mr. Obama will certainly be swamped with straight-ahead cash problems in every area of American life, from the foundering pension funds to the bankrupt state treasuries to the beggaring corporations to the starkly dispossessed and hungry masses of the jobless and re-poed. I wasn't kidding when I came up with the label, "the long emergency," to describe the storm that we are heading into, along with Mr. Obama. Of course, the current president -- and Mr. Obama has been shrewd to point out there is only one president in office at a time --has more than two months to wreak additional havoc in the financial system. Right now, he's asking Mr. O, "...do you want fries with that sandwich I made for you?"

BREAK ------------------------------------------------------------

A prudent man seeth the evil, and hideth himself; But the simple pass on, and suffer for it.

Proverbs 22:3

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.


Hosea 4:1-6

What am I buying going forward?

William Shatner has a good investment idea here:



Going to a gun show in 21 Nov and loading up:
FYI -


8 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 12, 2008 at 12:25 AM, motleyanimal (97.36) wrote:

One of your best posts!

The Gun Control link is particularly valuable to me since I am in the midst of a sometimes heated debate with some pacifist friends of mine. How sweet that I may drop this in their morning email and on their message boards!

Report this comment
#2) On November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Tastylunch (29.93) wrote:

2-5 positions? Wow you like to go big hunh?

Unfortunately Mr Kunstler is likely very very wrong about Wal-Mart. What they will and are doing (with their new line of grocery stores)is creating smaller stores, using their massive buying power in smaller foot prints. It amkes sense, the baby boomers shopping prefernces are changing, they want shorter wait times at checkout and less distance to travel in stores as they get more infirm. Home Depot has tried this as well with their  HD Select stores. As a small retailer I intensely dislike the boxes, but I do respect how smart and adaptable the best one are, Costco, Wal-Mart, Lowe's, Kroger's etc.etc. Americans are brainwashed into shopping at the boxes thinking they are cheaper, they won't give that up easily.

I think he underestimates what companies like P&G and Wal-mart can do to morph and survive....I have hard time seeing cottage style regional manufacturing making a comeback. National perhaps, regional only if our transportation system goesmad Madmax.

Globalization , I think is more likely to go dormant and then revive 50-60 years  from now (when alt fuels have had a chance to fully penetrate) if it is truly reversing han truly be dead...

I hope he's right about Oil, it dovetails with the numbers I saw as an undergrad who was looking into working into field. I'm tempted to load on futures contracts right now, but I'm being patient. Deleveraging is funny beast stronger than I anticipated...

The rest while perhaps apocalyptic makes a certain amount of plausible sense. I'm not sure it's likely but it's plausible.

Report this comment
#3) On November 12, 2008 at 8:14 AM, TDRH (99.84) wrote:

Nice post, but I do not see this portion coming to fruition:

" Similarly, the retail part of the economy. Many observers think that Wal-Mart and its clones are immune to the larger forces swirling around us. Just because many cash-strapped people are hunting for bargains at WalMart these days does not insure the survival of the Big Box model very far into the future. In fact, in every trend we can see -- from the oil markets to events in China to the impoverishment of the US working class to the coming crisis in truck transport -- you can easily discern fatal weaknesses in this model. Local retail (and its support structures) is coming back."

Big box will suffer with the rest, but "local retail?" It is not going to happen. Victor gardens, strengthening of the homespun sewing machine, but local retail is dead and will not return unless we are all riding horses and buggy whip factories spring up around the country.

The thing that is different about this collapse is just how precipitous it has been and it preceded the rise in unemployment. You knew the run up was prepairing it for the fall, but I did not anticipate this sudden of a shift, and definitely did not see $2.00 per gallon gasoline, even if it is short lived. Shows you how much of the economy was an illusion of leverage.

Report this comment
#4) On November 12, 2008 at 9:17 AM, TDRH (99.84) wrote:

By the way, in my estimation the most impressive statistic of your run has been the average pick score of Abitareperfect, it is over 22 similar to Specbear's. This means that you are not harvesting accuracy that often with +5% green picks. Your accuracy is not an illusion like mine.

Report this comment
#5) On November 12, 2008 at 2:19 PM, abitare (99.38) wrote:

Alcon,

Thanks for the replies.

motleyanimal, 

If you believe in the right to keep and bear arms, the election was a disaster. Here is a summary from Gun Owners of America.

http://www.gunowners.org/a110508.htm

A link to find some gun shows.

http://www.gunshows-usa.com 

Tastylunch,

I have a big watch list, but I try and find the home runs. In todays market, I just think it is time to find the underhanded pitches and swing for the bleachers, as the bankruptcies and deleveraging are killing stocks and companies.

Kunstler has a book the Long Emergency, about life after Peak Oil. That is why he thinks Wal Mart, trucking and the suburbs are doomed. He has an outstanding presentation at TED.

About James Howard Kunstler

James Howard Kunstler may be the world’s most outspoken critic of suburban sprawl. He believes the end of the fossil fuels era will soon force a return to smaller-scale, agrarian communities…

You can / should watch it here:

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/james_howard_kunstler_dissects_suburbia.html 

TDRH,

Good reply. I will try and address it when I get more time. 

 

Report this comment
#6) On November 12, 2008 at 2:24 PM, abitare (99.38) wrote:

Report this comment
#7) On November 12, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Tastylunch (29.93) wrote:

What Kunstler doesn't understand (I've read and enjoy some of his stuff, it's intriguing) , is that Big boxes can penetrate urban ares now due to new tech such as those escalators that service shopping carts.

Suburban Box  building style may die, but they will just move back into the core. They have the money, means, blueprint, political pull and resources to do it and they've already started...

Report this comment
#8) On November 12, 2008 at 5:41 PM, kdakota630 (31.51) wrote:

I've seen that 20/20 report a while back and agree whole-heartedly.

I generally love John Stossel (although I have to admit that I guiltily loved it when that wrestler popped him a couple of times causing Stossel to quickly turn tail), and highly recommend both his books.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement