Insider ownership vs mutual fund ownership
I'm wondering how many people here would prefer to see high INSIDER ownership to high mutual fund ownership in a stock they're considering investing real money in.
Insiders, Ive been led to believe, are in a much better position to judge a company's long-term potential than mtal fund managers. In addition to being in better position to insure that the company actually reaches it's optimum potential.
Admittedly they're also in position to sabotage the company, but doing so would be against their own long-terminters, wouldn't it?