Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

International Arbitration in Venezeula

Recs

3

May 13, 2011 – Comments (3) | RELATED TICKERS: KRY.DL , GRZ

Having heavily looked into gold companies and recently posting on Timberline Resources (TLR), I have run across an interesting play on gold.

Since 2000, 3 gold mining companies, Vanessa Ventures (now Infinito Gold), Gold Reserve, and Crystallex have been nationalized by the Venezuelan government.  The companies respectively have roughly 12million, 12million, and 17 million oz of gold.  All three have filed for international arbitration with the World Bank.  

Because their best projects have been nationalized, each stock has been smacked.  However, given Venezuela's history of cooperation in arbitration and Chavez's declaration a week ago that he wants to expand Venezuela's gold mining and to have more than one foreign company mining (the current one being Rusoro), I think that these companies make excellent speculative plays.

Infinito Gold sports a 15m market cap; Gold Reserve, 105m; Crystallex, 48m.  Each has filed for arbitration settlements of 1b, 1.98b, and 3.8b.  It should be noted that Infinito filed when gold's price was years from breaking $1000/oz.  I expect any settlement to take the current price into account - though I do not know why arbitration has taken so long.  While arbitrations rarely settle on 100% of the asked value, Venezuela has shown to pay fairly reasonable settlements as shown with Verizon and AES.  It paid Verizon 85% of the fair value as calculated by analysts.  Venezuela tends to settle arbitration cases in roughly 3 years.  

 

Looking at these companies market caps and possible payoffs, I think they are substantially undervalued, though they are obviously very speculative and risky in nature.  For the calcuations, I give the companies a $0 value outside of their possible rewards from arbitration.

Infinito Gold: a 1B settlement (non-adjusted), 15m market cap --> Market suggests 1.5% succeeding 

Gold Resource: 1.98B settlement, 105m market cap --> Market suggests 5% succeeding

Crystallex: 3.8B settlement, 48m market cap --> Market suggests 1.2% succeeding

Where succeeding is defined as getting everything asked for in arbitration or the amount to be received as a percentage of the amount asked.

From these we can clearly see how inefficiently the market has priced these companies given Venezuela's history of paying.  If we assume that each company gets only 10% of the amount filed for (a failure in arbitration terms), we are looking at the companies going up 500%, 100%, and 700% respectively. For a full settlement, we are looking at gains of 5000%, 1000%, and 7000%.

It is not difficult to calculate different scenarios with higher percentages and see how undervalued these three companies might be.  The good thing I can say about these companies is that it is unlikely that they are going to rocket off and we have at least 18 months before the first decision is reached.  Because the nature an arbitration case is similar to a drug approval by the FDA, these companies are going to jump discontinuously when the first settlement of the group is announced as they likely will end up receiving the same terms.

Given this scenario, I would recommend investors take a small portfolio and split it equally among the three companies (and Rusoro if you feel so inclined). Let it sit in your portfolio and gather dust.  While I strongly believe that investors have a long time to get into this dance, I fear that Venezuela may settle with one or more of the companies outside of arbitration and the investor will miss the one time jump that happens in parallel with the other companies.  Even if the companies get a 10% arbitration in 3 years, we are looking at annualized gains of 82%, 26%, and 200% - well worth tying up 5-10% of your portfolio for 3 years.

3 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On May 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, silverminer (99.60) wrote:

There is no need to take on that much risk in order to speculate in the gold space. There are scores of ludicrously undervalued options out there operating in far friendlier jurisdictions.

I recommend that resource investors stay as far away from Venezuelan assets as humanly possible. I do not consider those names to be "excellent speculative plays" in any way, shape, or form.

On the other hand ...

I took a preliminary look at Timberline recently, and aim to conduct a bit more DD before deciding whether to include the company in my pm basket. It's hard to be confident in the coimpany's 60,000-ounce annual production estimate (30,000 attributable) from the Butte Highlands JV, since the project has no established resource estimate whatsoever. But it has caught my eye, and I look forward to examining the company in greater depth.

Report this comment
#2) On May 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Hibachi0 (91.79) wrote:

I agree there are many great plays out there in juniors, but I have to disagree based on the possible returns these companies could provide.  I would be very interested in the other companies you see as very undervalued as I am looking for great plays in this space.

I think that these companies make great speculative plays because to duplicate these possible returns in another miner one would have to have invest in a company with no confirmed reserves at all and have enough geological experience to be able to identify such properties.  With these companies, you know what you might get. However, you don't know if you are going to get it.  It seems to me from my calculations above that these companies are undervalued with respect to previous arbitration cases.  

You could invest in 100 small juniors and never get a 50x return in three years and never really know if the price you pay to get in is fair.  With these companies, the well outlined process of arbitration and histories of settlements makes it much easier to value them as lottery tickets and calculate their present worth - even if they all lose and are ultimately worth nothing. 

Report this comment
#3) On May 13, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Hibachi0 (91.79) wrote:

On a separate note, I should mention that Vanessa Ventures is especially unlikely to succeed in arbitration and that the way their contract is set up, even if they win arbitration it is not clear how much money they will have to split with Placer. 

To summarize, Placer Dome had mining rights that VV bought, the government contested the transfer, seized the property and sold the rights to the field to KRY.  Also, Placer Dome has the right to buy back some of the field if gold prices rise (as they have) so it is less clear how to value them with respect to KRY and GRZ.

To add an additional kink in valuing KRY, I am not sure if their Chinese partner, who KRY brought in mostly to smooth over relations with the Venezuelan government, will take claim to any arbitration money won.  It is worth noting that KRY filed for arbitration after they brought in their partner so while I expect this possibility to be reflected in their arbitration suit, I am not certain.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement