Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

QualityPicks (50.97)

iPad will be initially misunderstood as a “big iPhone"

Recs

4

January 28, 2010 – Comments (11)

The iPad is out. I quickly read all the news about it, and became a little disappointed. But don’t write off the iPad so quick. Sure it is not revolutionary like the iPhone was, and while reading the news out there I really got to the conclusion myself “the iPad is just a big iPhone”. But, then I started to get it.

When I first saw the keynote when the iPhone was introduced, I was blown away. This was a truly revolutionary product. The hardware was awesome, but to me, the “crown jewel” was the interface. The interface made things usable, fun, and easy. Then I bought one and started using it. I was even more blown away. After using my iPhone for a while, the interface became almost addicting to me, because of its intuitiveness and easiness to get things done. But then, when I go back to my desktop computer, I feel like I’m in the past, using a “retarded interface". I kept wondering “it would be so nice if my desktop computer learned the tricks of the iPhone interface”. On the other hand, the iPhone interface was awesome, but the iPhone is tiny, so you really need bigger/better hardware to do more advanced things.

So, say hello to the iPad. Initially, since most applications are going to be iPhone apps, the iPad will, for the most part, be a “bigger iPhone”. It is not until you see and play with the iPad applications, that “you start to get it”. I saw Apple demonstrate Keynote, Pages and Numbers, and iBook. Then Safari, Email and Calendar for the iPad. That is when things clicked for me. I thought “wait a minute, I see where this is going”. The iPad applications will initially cover 70% of your needs, but as more and more sophisticated applications show up, the iPad will eventually replace your desktop OS and computer. Seriously. Even though I’m a mac fan, I consider myself a “realist” and I believe Mac OS X will not beat Windows never in market share in its current incarnation in the desktop OS wars. However, I think the iPad/iPhone OS, is morphing into the desktop OS of the future. I believe, Apple found a way to beat Microsoft not only at the operating system game, but with Keynote, Numbers and Pages, they will also beat them at the “Office” suite game. I’m getting ahead, but it is becoming obvious for me now that this tactic actually has a good chance of working for Apple (unlike Mac OS X).

I don’t expect you to agree yet. I work with computers and software for a living so I know what I’m saying. I still have friends with Blackberries that can’t seem to understand what the big deal is about the iPhone. I don’t argue with them, I just tell them “if you buy an iPhone, you will see”. And all of my friends that had blackberries, that reluctantly bought an iPhone, come back and tell me “I get it, even though the blackberry does almost all the same things, the iPhone is a pleasure to use”. I expect something similar from the desktop OS experience. People will get it once they start doing work the iPad interface way.

So as it evolves, I expect bigger iPads, with bigger screens and more capacity. However, the external keyboard/dock I believe is a necessity for that “20%” of the time when you need to do heavy typing. 

So after I thought about the iPad further, not so much what it is initially, but what I believe will become, the iPad is not a "huge iPhone" but simple “huge”.

 

11 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On January 28, 2010 at 3:32 AM, APJ4RealHoldings (24.96) wrote:

the Ipad does not need to be a winner for Apple, but for such an innovative company to go through the motions and hold a big launch for a new product...its sad there wasn't more moving/shaking going on.

You are right about the morphing landscape of computing and how through applications, the iPad will shine.  But there could have been so much more.  Many of the big time items I list below, you certainly not see on this Ipad product:


no multasking, no videoconferencing, no new OS enhancements, no native voice2text & text2voice, no usb or any sd storage expansion capabilities, no on native remote control to ur PC or TV and no on remote login to ur computers natively.

pointless to have if you already own an iphone.

ipad=fail

in my opinion. 

however the next rendition of apple touch products with larger screens (new laptops/desktops or 2nd gen ipads), i would hope to have the above features which I'm sure would be the mega movers of the tech world....like mac osx, iphone, vmware, LEDs, and SSDs.

 

Report this comment
#2) On January 28, 2010 at 4:19 AM, JibJabs (95.47) wrote:

I'm with you QualityPicks. I think it's a game-changer. I will not consider buying until the storage becomes comprable to laptops (I need at least 200 gigs for music and photos with confidence I can keep downloading and snapping away). When that threshold is crossed, the only people I expect to stay behind are gamers and people that need heavy-duty computing power. Basically, the laptop has just been given a slow and agonizing kiss of death.

Report this comment
#3) On January 28, 2010 at 8:12 AM, cthomas1017 (30.39) wrote:

Interestingly, I found the iPad to be remarkably a good corporate product.  Imagine it in the hands of a nurse or a field inspector.  Frankly, I think hospitals are going to be deploying lots of iPads.

Report this comment
#4) On January 28, 2010 at 9:07 AM, baldheadeddork (35.47) wrote:

@cthomas1017

Don't hold your breath. The iPad can't run MacOS software, can't run multiple programs at the same time, you can't capture signatures on its screen, and by the time the iPad is shipping in volume there will be Intel Atom-based net-tablets that can run existing DMR software and will still probably undercut the iPad by a couple hundred bucks a unit. 

 

Report this comment
#5) On January 28, 2010 at 10:27 AM, cthomas1017 (30.39) wrote:

Hey dork! :p  Those are all very good technical reasons.  On the non-techie side, plusses for the iPad... nurses are already taking iPhones & Touches into work to help them do their jobs.  They also tend to be familiar with the iPhone/Pod interface.  IT in hospitals need to reign this in.  The $499 version of the iPad will support nursing functions just fine, so coming in a couple hundred lower is going to be difficult to do.  I see in Apple's stores the employees have barcoding on their devices.  Apple could productize that capability and open a new market.  Wish they would.  I find it hard to believe that signature capture can't be provided by a third party.  Electronic signatures are becoming a more accepted practice in hospitals (for staff).

iPad v2 predictions... video, camera, voice enhancements, multi-tasking.  We'll see of course, but I think there's a market.

Report this comment
#6) On January 28, 2010 at 12:07 PM, QualityPicks (50.97) wrote:

You are correct cthomas, there will be lots of uses for the iPad. It is a nice product, and I know it will do good with lots of new uses.

People complaining about the lack of multitasking, a USB port, phone calls, etc. make my point perfectly. I don’t expect everybody to understand yet. The success of the iPad (and future iPads) will slowly become more clear as iPad applications come out. I really think future iPad like computers will replace today’s laptops.

The iPad is just the “initial platform” so that people start getting used to the idea, and so that developers can start building iPad specific apps.

Report this comment
#7) On January 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, lh100 (22.63) wrote:

This has existed for years, and it was not succesful. But if there is anybody who can market that thing well enough, it has to be Apple.

But i think this is what the Ipad is : a huge marketing thing, and not much more. The world has changed a lot, and having mobile data seems like the new norm.

However, I do not see the utility of that device compared to what exists already. Compared to an Itouch(because there is no actual phone there..), it is a bigger one, like it is mentionned here. The screen will allow for a lot more games to be implemented, as well as new video feature that while already existing, would not be as enjoyable as now. I saw somebody calling it "the missing link between an Iphone and a laptop". But if that is the case, where does an Ipad fit into a person's time during the day?

The Ipad does not fit into any pocket, making it less mobile(ironically) than any other I-product. Should that not be the key point of this product, mobility? Surely a new slick strap leather bag will be made for this product, but am i supposed to replace the Itouch by the Ipad, and add 30$ data monthly fees to access the web? Add a blackberry(or an Iphone for that matter) and you now pay 60$ a month( 720 $ a year..) for two devices that does exactly the same thing? So again, where does the Ipad fit into your life?

The Iphone was just insanely popular because it was a smartphone with just an insane amount of things you could do... how did the Ipad bring anything new? It gives a new platform for developpers to work on, that i have to give. But no camera, no phone and more important no usb plugs(this means this will never laptop functional, from usb keys to keyboards you can actually type on faster than 10 words a minute..) is certainly not going forward, but going in a different direction.

If the Ipad is meant to be some kind of Kindle advanced with so much more,(like it was presented at 3PM when stock was going downhill), why not just add an App(doesnt even have to) on the Iphone/Itouch and make the screen bigger? I just dont get the added value of that new product.

If this is to be a netbook, then this is probably where it has the best chances to compete against. It is more portable than a notebook(just not having to flip a screen is great), and the price range is the same(but less memory btw). It is perfect for casual things like videos, web, music, games etc. But to work on it? using word(or works), excel, or even emails? I don't think so, even the best cell phone texting in the world will not do the job faster(or fast enough) than a keyboard.

 To me this really is for anybody who wanted something to have fun with, not to work anything on that. And so again, where does this fit?

 To me, the answer is : Games and videos.

Web browsing and possible ebooks is nice as well, but not really that much more.

The video part is great, as it is basically like a portable DVD that you can use on long travel, or your everyday travel in buses and subways. Although i find it pretty big, i guess it is indeed a in-between heavy laptop and small video player.

The gaming part is really great, and this is really where Apple stands out, as there is nothing compared to this on the market. Just with this, they are putting a big nail into the PC coffin : the hardcore gamers might not care, but the regular gamers will enjoy not having to be in their basement to play their games. With an internet component, online MOBILE game is really one great thing i see coming.

 Overall, i just don't think this is going to be a huge hit, as in my opinion this is FOR NOW just a entertainment device. Who knows if the 2nd version will be awesome.

 

And by the way, the name is just so horrible. 

Report this comment
#8) On January 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, QualityPicks (50.97) wrote:

Thanks lh100 for such a detailed answer. I see what you are saying, and it is exactly my point. People will fail to see the good in the iPad initially. But one or two years from now, once more apps are available and you get to “play” with one, you are going to tell me “I get it, I see what you were saying”. Believe me, I had similar arguments when the iPhone came out, and the iPhone was really revolutionary. The iPad is not revolutionary, is just an extension of the iPhone into more powerful hardware. Eventually the iPad OS will make it to the Notebook, and finally to the Desktop. But we are still a year (more likely three or more) away from that. Just do yourself a favor and play around with one when they come out. 

Report this comment
#9) On January 28, 2010 at 8:32 PM, ChrisGraley (99.66) wrote:

Ok, for one second, I'd like you to imagine your iphone without the apps...

Yes it's still a phone with a great interface, but is it a game-changer? 

The ipad missed the mark in my opinion. There isn't anything that I can do on the ipad that I can't do on the iphone. So basically you have a giant iphone that is supposed to compete in a new market.

Now the problem is that they should have definitely focused on a purpose driven purchase and made this thing better for say the nurse or the  executive, but they didn't. It's just a big iphone.

There are slate tablets that are already capable of doing more than the ipad and have better hardware for the same price.

There is also an operating system called Android by Google that allows Apps that is more open and therefore more customizable in the corporate market. 

Microsoft also has a tablet coming out that appears to be a better book reader than the ipad and a better computer as well. They also have a multi-touch patent for their surface computer.

Apple will live off the iphone hype to sell a few ipads, but the competition will eat their lunch this time. 

I usually by cutting edge technology like this before most people, but I'm waiting for the Microsoft Courier to come out, to which I'll quickly port Android to. 

Report this comment
#10) On June 02, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Appiness (< 20) wrote:

I have no use for an iPad. It will not replace my iPhone-no phone, obviously. It will not replace my MacBook Pro-I need Photoshop, Acrobat etc. And since I'm a grownup, I don't need a gaming device.

iPad is for entertainment, that's it.

Report this comment
#11) On February 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, no5tromo85 (< 20) wrote:

Dear author

By the time the first "revolutionary" iPhone was released, I already owned a Sony Ericsson mobile phone which included the following features that were unheard of in Apple back then:

3G, video calls/front camera, 5 MP camera with led flash, video recording, infrared connection, unlocked to carriers and many more features plus it did virtually everything else an iPhone could do.

There were also plenty of smartphones already out that were way superior to iPopne. So if by "revolutionary" you mean slick design then I did the right thing by not reading the rest of this article.

iPhones have come a long way and I actually own an iPhone 3Gs myself but if it was discontinued tomorrow I would be able to find a bunch of worth replacements. A good product, as it is now, but nothing revolutionary about it, on the contrary it often slacks in certain technologies.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement