Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Is China Sky One a buy right now?

Recs

10

September 07, 2010 – Comments (3) | RELATED TICKERS: CSKI.PK , SAYCY.DL

Ooh... that's a tough one. It is hard to say, because it was fast-growing, cheaply valued, and suspected of fraud. Then its price dropped 30% over the weekend on news that it won't be growing as quickly, and the CFO resigned right before the 3-day weekend. So its growth is in question, its valuation is even more compelling, and the charges of fraud are more compelling as well. Maybe its cash and other assets are fake, as in the case of Satyam (SAY). Maybe it will never be a going concern. Maybe it will go to $0.02 as the scandals mount.

I still think those possibilities are pretty unlikely. I am very dismayed by the huge cut to CSKI's projected growth, and the loss of several of their most important distributors, but the valuation is just too low here. It is selling for less than book value, and while the lowered guidance is approximately 0% growth, it is not shrinking, either. For a company trading for well under 3x earnings, with no debt, a decent-sized cash hoard (assuming fake cash is not becoming an epidemic), and a pretty strong history of, commitment to, and opportunity for, growth, a 0% growth rate for one period is not bad at all. Even if the 0% growth rate continues for one to two years, the allaying of corruption fears could send the stock skyrocketing.

So what are the odds that it really is fraudulent? With the CFO resigning, I think that is the question on many people's minds. It is a good question, and I don't know the answer. I don't know how to research the question, and I don't know if anyone can answer it satisfactorily. But here's one thing I know:

Satyam was beaten to a pulp and left for dead when they were discovered to be fraudulent, and at the post-scandal prices, they were a tremendous investment. It has more or less quintupled since it was cut to pieces on the news that all of the cash on its balance sheet was a big, fat lie. If nothing similar happens with CSKI, you will probably wish you had bought some for under 7. If something similar does happen, it will still very likely be a buy at its new price. That would be an opportunity for anyone who still has investable monies and is watching CSKI - people who are tip-toeing into positions now, for instance.

In a way, what happened today (actually this past weekend) is likely to be analogous to Satyam's bombshell. I call CSKI at today's price a buy, even with all the stink around it. But watch for another shoe to drop, which would look bad on paper, and be another buying opportunity.

3 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On September 07, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Varchild2008 (78.76) wrote:

Wow and I thought I was a risk taker....

Report this comment
#2) On September 07, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Momentum21 (93.82) wrote:

I gave it a look today...these big moves always pull me in... : )

In my experience following catastrophe's similar to CSKI, I sense another leg or 2 down before one start's licking his/her chops over this one. SAY went from 30 to like 1.10 over the course of several months. And these guys weren't exactly knocking the cover off the ball before the allegations.  

I might have to close my green thumb and short it for a spell.

Speaking of SAY...it is finding a heartbeat lately. Everyday I wake up fearing that the phantom earnings report is going to surface...that investment just turned green for me after many months of battle.

good luck...I will be keeping an eye on it!  

Report this comment
#3) On September 08, 2010 at 10:39 AM, lh100 (22.63) wrote:

I don't find the comparison to SAY to be fair... SAY is, even after the scandal, worth over 30 times more than CSKI. Also, they are not operating in the same country, although i can see the similarities.

 

Every financial statements in China is false(almost..), to avoid taxes and (very) complicated regulations, or so i hear. I don't think having authorities looking at your books when they are not correct as a good idea, and while it could be a move for more transparency, for the distributors in China, i don't think they care. And CSKI is certainly not big enough to impose transparency and change the way things are done in China... 

My biggest concern is that CSKI won't be able to find good distributors for their products, and considering how scattered they are, they need as many as possible.

I just don't buy the whole fake thing. I believe it's at worse huge overstatement in sales and cash, and at best small ones.

I'm tempted to buy OTM calls for March 2011, but it's so risky.. 

 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement