Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

TMFPostOfTheDay (< 20)

JNJ Back on Track?

Recs

2

February 27, 2012 – Comments (1) | RELATED TICKERS: JNJ

Board: Value Hounds

Author: LeKitKat

What company has a better credit rating than most countries, is paying a higher yield than 10-year US treasuries and probably has more cash on its balance sheet than Greece, Portugal and Spain combined?

Johnson & Johnson, in spite of more than two years of revenue and margin declines, continues to have enviable amounts of cash, maintains its AAA rating, and is easily able to pay and increase its dividend—now yielding 3.5%.

The trickle of recalls that started in 2009 with Tylenol products for kids turned into a flood over the next two years and damaged this venerable company. It has not killed it and there are signs of recovery. While the pace of recalls has been decelerating, problems continue to plague them. Infant Tylenol has been recalled this month due to a defect in the protective cover—it collapsed into the medication.

Product defects have hit the consumer segment especially hard with more than 50 separate OTC medication recalls. Prescription medications and medical devices were not immune to problems and JNJ recalled Topramax, and Eprex, Acuvue contact lenses, Ethicon sutures and DePuy has withdrawn its metal on metal hip resurfacing product from the market.

Expensive Mistakes

The hip recall incurred a charge of $3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2011. In 2010, the McNeil recalls cost the business around $900 million in lost sales. While it was not broken out for 2011, lost business is estimated at $400 million. Remediation costs will continue through 2012 and are taken out of cost of goods. Fort Washington will not open until 2013. Gross margins contracted as costs related to remediation were incurred.

Generally, gross margins have declined since the acquisition of the consumer segment from Pfizer in 2007. Consumer products are lower margin and they became a much larger percentage of revenue in 2007.

[See post for tables.]

Growing by Acquisition


The flood of recalls can trace its roots back to the JNJ acquisition of Pfizer’s consumer healthcare at the end of 2006. Under Pfizer in 2005, consumer healthcare did revenue of $3.9 billion and JNJ paid $16.6 billion. The consumer segment went from 18% of total revenue to 25%. Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) was reshaping its business into a pure pharmaceutical company – a plan that went somewhat astray when it acquired Wyeth for its portfolio of drugs and pipeline and ended up back in the consumer/nutritional business.

The acquisition by JNJ was an attempt to buy some growth. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices were beginning to slow. Two drug blockbusters with a combined $6 billion in peak sales were set to see generic competition in 2009—Risperdal and Topamax.

JNJ’s standard operating procedure is to grow through acquisitions and partnerships. It works well for the most part and it worked in 2007—the year of the acquisition. It will be interesting to see if Synthes, their largest acquisition in history at $21.3 billion, will give them the growth they are paying for. Synthes will close in 2012. As a medical device company, it may serve to expand margins.

The trouble with the growth through consumer products is the effect on combined margins. Increasing the consumer segment, with operating margins half of medical devices and pharmaceutical, lowered JNJ’s combined margins. The consumer segment went from 18% of revenue in 2006 to 25% in 2008. Margins dropped 5%. It was a decision to add growth regardless of the effect. The plan was to cut costs in consumer by $500 to $600 million to bring margins back. The cuts short-changed the corporate quality and compliance program and that opened the Pandora’s box of seemingly endless recalls.

The decentralized structure that JNJ’s acquisition strategy leads to requires the CEO to have a firm grasp on each business. JNJ has gone from 30 subsidiaries in 1982 to around 250 operating companies currently. The task of keeping tabs on all of JNJ is daunting. Cutting essential oversight personnel was a critical error. The size makes delegation a necessity and not only numbers of employees declined but also quality did as well. Reports to management did not raise red flags because those responsible for reports and briefings were not qualified for the task. With Weldon’s resignation, we can hope for resolution of these defects.

[See post for tables.]

As year-over-year comps began to apply in 2008, consolidated growth dropped back to disappointing low single-digits. When pharmaceuticals slowed from expirations in 2009, growth fell into negative numbers. Consumer could not rescue growth and by 2010, the consumer segment was under pressure as the costs of the recalls began to build. Consumer appears to have bottomed in 2010 and consolidated, gross and operating income growth were all in negative territory.

There has been some recovery in 2011. Operating income growth is still negative as JNJ took a $3 billion charge for hip recalls in Q4 2011.

Return on Invested Income

When looking at a serial acquirer it is useful to check how the returns on the investments are doing. That is best done with ROIC. ROIC takes into account investments in all of the assets including working capital, property, plants and equipment and any good will and intangibles that have been paid for that do not represent tangible assets.

For the numerator, we use net operating profit after adjusted taxes or NOPLAT. That is operating income after depreciation with taxes adjusted to represent cash taxes paid.

ROIC dropped post-acquisition of Pfizer’s consumer segment and as integration pains subsided, it recovered. In 2011, it hit six-year lows as poor performance in pharmaceutical and medical devices combined with recall costs sent growth into negative territory

WACC (cost of capital) is 8% and the spread remains widely positive. ROIC will improve as the company continues its evident recovery.

Q4 2011/Annual Results Highlights

Global sales were $16.3 billion for Q4-- up 3.9% constant currency
U.S., sales decreased 3.4%; Europe grew 9.4% operationally; Asia-Pacific/Africa region up 7.9%. US continues to lag.
Net income was $3.1 billion and EPS was $1.13, up 9.3% and 9.7% respectively (adjusted for the charge for hips).

Annual revenue was $65 billion, an increase of 5.6%. Sales grew 2.8% operationally; currency added 2.8%. A weak dollar is great for international businesses.

Net revenue was $13.9 billion; EPS (adjusted for the DePuy charge) was $5.00 grew 5% versus the 2010 results.

Consumer

Consumer segment Q4 revenue was $3.7 billion-- up 1.6% adjusted for currency. Operational sales increased 2.7%; even U.S. sales were up 2.4%.

OTC meds were still under pressure and down 2.9% due to supply constraints.

Skin care (including Neutrogena) remains one of the brightest segments and was up 6.6%.

Pharmaceuticals

Revenue for Q4 was $6.1 billion -- up 6.7%. The loss of patent on Levaquin hit the US particularly hard revenue decreased 8.3%. Sales outside the U.S. increased 25%. Patent expiration is always painful and JNJ is through the worst of it for now.

The JNJ pipeline is beginning to pay its way -- REMICADE, STELARA and SIMPONI, were up nearly 20%; growth for REMICADE was 14.3%, STELARA at over 70%, and SIMPONI 10.7%. Remicade sales were helped by JNJ winning a substantial portion of the Merck territory. VELCADE (for multiple myeloma) growth was 22.4%. PREZISTA (HIV) was up 34.2%. The pipeline and its success in turning pharma growth around has been one of Weldon’s greatest accomplishments. Growth in pharmaceuticals and a fertile pipeline critical components that will keep the JNJ business moving forward.

Medical Devices

Q4 revenue was $6.5 billion –- up 2.4% operationally with a positive currency impact had a positive impact of 0.3% for a total sales increase of 2.7%; sales in U.S. were down 0.4%; outside the U.S. they were up 4.6%. Exiting the stent business impacted sales negatively. It had to be done as the JNJ stent was losing market share every quarter. Abbott with its Xience franchise has taken over as market leader in the stent business

DePuy (orthopedic implants) grew 0.3%; U.S. down 4% and the business outside the U.S. growing by 5.7%. The orthopedics business has been dismal with hip and knee implants struggling to keep even low single-digit growth. Stryker (NYSE:SYK) and Zimmer (NYSE:ZMH) have both failed to see resumption of fast-growing sales and have seen their double-digit growth fall into low single-digits. It is possible that the golden age of high ortho growth is gone and the new normal is single-digit. I would expect high single-digit rather than the current anemic growth we are seeing quarter after quarter once economic conditions improve.
Overall, the picture is one of JNJ returning to growth.

Weldon is Leaving

JNJ has started to recover and that should go on as consumer expenses wind down, pharmaceutical pipeline products continue to grow and ortho returns to at least high single-digit growth. Consumer confidence may begin to be restored under new leadership if Alex Gorsky is capable. It’s unlikely that will happen with Weldon in charge. William Weldon will leave in April after 10 years as CEO.

Dividend Discount Value

JNJ has a long history of paying dividends and increasing the payout. The recent payout ratio is at 64% and at an 8 year high. The increase in the dividend was 6% and is following a declining trend in growth of the dividend. As JNJ reaches stabilization in top line and earnings growth, the dividend growth will need to stabilize. With a company of its size, we may be seeing long-term low single-digit revenue growth ahead.

A dividend growth model based on the Gordon growth model for a mature company gives a value per share of $94 if we allow 6% growth. That may be optimistic and if we take a more conservative 3% growth that allows the company to increase at near the rate of historical inflation the value drops to $41.83. The truth is likely somewhere in between and the value lies close to the current price.

At a yield of 3.5% and a AAA credit rating, with prospects of much improved performance ahead, free cash in excess of $11 billion in 2011 to pay $6 billion in dividends, the dividend is safe and decent compensation for an investment. I would not count on much share price appreciation.

1 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 27, 2012 at 12:39 PM, DannyHaszard (< 20) wrote:

Risperal reproached.
Same saga here as Eli Lilly Zyprexa.
 Johnson and Johnson is a trusted brand we associate with babies.
Risperdal,Zyprexa,as well as the other atypical antipsychotics, are being prescribed for children, even though this is an unapproved, off-label use. An estimated 2.5 million children are now taking atypical antipsychotics. Over half are being given them for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,many of these foster children.
Weight gain, increases in triglyceride levels and associated risks for (life-long) diabetes and cardiovascular disease.Lilly made $65 billion on Zyprexa!
--Daniel Haszard

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement