Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Knew the birth rate was going down

Recs

6

November 17, 2011 – Comments (5)

It appears a poor economy is one of the better forms of birth control.  But that was my reasoning as to why the birth rate was going down, as I predicted three years ago.

 

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 18, 2011 at 2:19 AM, FleaBagger (29.37) wrote:

That doesn't hold internationally.

Report this comment
#2) On November 18, 2011 at 2:35 AM, awallejr (82.72) wrote:

In the end "birth control" doesn't apply to countries of poverty.  A child is viewed more as an asset especially if it is male.  This is not meant to be sexist.  Families in poorer or growing economies push population growth since those children represent income via employment.

Personally it is irrelevant to me since I will be dead soon enough but in the end some races will dominate others over time.

Report this comment
#3) On November 20, 2011 at 10:46 AM, dwot (97.03) wrote:

awallejr, what do you mean you will be dead soon enough? 

Report this comment
#4) On November 20, 2011 at 5:45 PM, awallejr (82.72) wrote:

Oh I was just talking in terms of the scheme of things over time, nothing imminent ;)

Report this comment
#5) On November 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Frankydontfailme (27.20) wrote:

This Latvian blogger has some interesting ideas on the correlation between debt and population growth

 http://saposjoint.net/Forum/download/file.php?id=3126

from this blog:

http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2626&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=900 

Seems to jive with your thinking. Impoverished nations tend to be surplus nations (these days) and so can afford to have many kids. The developed debtor nations are too heavily leveraged for more rabbits running around (until the de-leveraging ends). Interesting theory anyways. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement