Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Varchild2008 (83.82)

Lucy in the (C) with Stock Options

Recs

8

December 17, 2009 – Comments (7) | RELATED TICKERS: C

C..C...C...C...C...Buy some shares of C....Oh what fun is C....C....C....C...C...Greatest stock that can be is....buying stock options of C.....C....C...Stock up on wondrous C........Lucy's got the C.....C...C..Fever...Buy some shares of C.....Jim Cramer told me they are practically Free.....So buy some shares of C...C..C....C

Jim Cramer says they'll triple by 2012 you see!????

oops..no..not really...not really at all...because it's C..C..C...C..C stands for Citigroup.....Buy some shares of C....C....C....C..and plummet into the Sea...Sea...Sea..Sea....

Enjoy your stake in C......C...C....C...Enjoy stocking up with C....C...C..C..Got get more of C.....C....C..Can't get enough of C..C..C...C..$20 billion more shares of C...C..C..C..oh Yesiree!!!

What fun is C???     Lucy in the C with Stock Options.......!!! She loves the C..... oh wait....she's buying PUTS....$3.00 Jan 2010 PUTS.....LUCY hates the C?!??! 

Lucy despises the almighty C....C..C..C...C....C what she's done as the C.....C...C...crashes into a TREE....TREE...TREE....before the opening bell.

7 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On December 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Evlampius (< 20) wrote:

lots of time on your hands?

Report this comment
#2) On December 17, 2009 at 10:35 AM, UKIAHED (36.06) wrote:

Please step away from the coffee. ;)

Report this comment
#3) On December 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Melaschasm (56.85) wrote:

I am not a big fan of C.  The recent story about C being given a special exemption from current US tax law (as have several other big financials), seems to indicate that the banking sector rally this year, was likely more about additional gifts from tax payers, than about improvements in the business. 

However, I am hesitant to short C, because I do not know how much money the government is willing to give to C.

Report this comment
#4) On December 17, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Varchild2008 (83.82) wrote:

A short play on C makes plenty of sense right now in that at some point the FEDs have to sell off $5 billion worth of their stake in C common shares.  That is a clue that in the short term this one's going to be at least a $2 stock....

Of course I could be wrong..... But in the face of the FED sell off window extended from 45 days to 90... Assuming it does not get extended out much beyond that.....  I think a good SHORT play is to short C as soon as it has a 1 or 2 day post traumatic Thursday SPIKE upward and then BAM! pound it down.

Of course I don't do SHORTING... I never DO shorting... I don't have the GUTS to short.....  But if I did have the guts to short something and you give me a stock that in which will have a $5 billion sell-off spree from the FED occur soon.... then I would be deeply interested.

Report this comment
#5) On December 17, 2009 at 7:20 PM, tkell31 (24.89) wrote:

Shorting it made sense two days ago, now? minimal upside, 4 billion shares traded hands today, not sure a $5 billion dollar sell off spread over several days or weeks is going to driver it much further south.

Report this comment
#6) On December 19, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Varchild2008 (83.82) wrote:

Hence why I said you need to wait for the short term spike upward AND THEN SHORT....

Not to short right after it already had its big sell-off day... the very day I posted.

Report this comment
#7) On December 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, rd80 (98.28) wrote:

Treasury has 7.7 billion shares they need to sell off.  The $5 billion worth was just what they were going to sell in conjuction with the Citi raise.

I suspect anyone interested in buying C stock will get lots more opportunities at these or better prices. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement