Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

sikiliza (< 20)

Margin Stanley and the 40 Thieves

Recs

6

May 25, 2012 – Comments (2) | RELATED TICKERS: FB , MS

During the era during which the the collection of stories known as One Thousand and One Nights was written, if you were a storyteller, you had to come up with an endless stream of stories otherwise you would lose your head, literally. People got really creative and came up with some of the most fascinating tales that humanity has ever countered.

Therein ends our analogy. In the case of Margin Stanley, greed and the need for a $100B tombstone in Michael Grimes' office trumped the responsibility to ensure that investors got a chance to participate FAIRLY in Facebook's (former) growth story. Alas, it was not to be. According to Professor Aswath Damodaran at NYU and who is also known as the modern-day Ben Graham, what went on behind closed doors at MS was not a valuation process but rather a set of pricing decisions. They had to ensure that the shares got sold at $38 and that everyone (not including retail muppets) that wanted shares, would get some.

Enter, David Ebersman, the Facebook CFO, who though greatly respected for his successful finance career at Genentech was yet to encounter the Wolves of Wallstreet. At the drop of a coin, he acquiesced to increasing the float by 25%. The poor lad failed to protest enough. He was green, you see.

Then the ball landed squarely in NASDAQ's court and they literally ducked. Not only did they install a remote market opening bell ringer in Palo Alto for the pleasure of his majesty and his royal court but they also failed to keep their eye on the ball. And that ball moved fast. Facebook went live and for the first 38 minutes stayed on a suspiciously even course at $42 before dropping like a rock. Meanwhile buyers and sellers did not hear a pip from the pits.

By the end of the day last Friday, the game had been won. The Muppets had been slaughtered and all that was left was for by-standers like you and me to stare at the wreckage that was the Facebook IPO.

 

 

 

 

2 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On May 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, L0RDZ (84.36) wrote:

I believe the proper term is  " They got stuffed ".

The fools  who tried to buy some Fake book from the insiders got stuffed.

They didn't get kissed either...  :-P

Face book  managed to nickel and dime down their costs and they got  what they wanted  a bumped up max value IPO initial price at the max amount of  shares~  the insiders  cost  was around near  a  dollar  a  share.

100 billion dollar value ??  yeah right  and I have a lot of bridges around the world  I'd like to sell the fools who bought  FB.

More like F' en  broke.

Broke back.

How did you like  the execution,  for  the peasants, we're sorry we seem to be experiencing  technical glitches, and  omg  for the ones who tried to cancel order and  redo them,  they got  filled ~  LOL..

like they dropped the soap...  in the prison showers.

How you like it ?

Sort of reminds me of a scene in showgirls  where the black girl  Molly ( who sews the outfits) tries to warn  Nomi  about not doing the boat show because  of  the previous girls not liking it ( being used like you know what  receptacles ).

 Next Nomi  asks another dancer who previously  did the show "Did  you like it ?"

Her answer "DID I like it ?? ... yeah  I liked it..."

My question for anyone who bought FB,  did you like it ???

 

Report this comment
#2) On May 25, 2012 at 5:41 PM, sikiliza (< 20) wrote:

And to add insult to injury, turns out that some members of the syndicate were actually helping clients short the FB issue. Where do these monkeys draw the line?

 

http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304065704577424733907622256.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTTopStories&mg=reno64-wsj 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement