Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

More lies or truths from Benghazi CIA ordered to stand down.



October 30, 2012 – Comments (4)

Okay  it's been a rough week  and  although  some  do  not really care,  what  some  have  discovered  in  researching  the  attack  on  our  people  in Libya  is  so  disturbing that  I  almost  wasn't going  to  reprint  the messed up decision  by  your  POTUS  and  company  to order  not  once,  but  at least  twice  a  complete  stand  down  to  our  CIA  operatives  and  any  military  assets  in  the nearby  area.

Mac Slavo: It’s a month after the incident in Bengzahi, Libya and the Obama administration is still trying to shift blame and responsibility.

First, the President claimed the attacks were nothing more than a riot that got out of control as a result of a video that insulted the religion of Islam. Immediately after this narrative it was shot full of holes, because as we know, a CIA safehouse, which no random rioters could have possibly known about, was also attacked.

Then we were told by the State department and others that this was an Al Queda cell that we had no prior knowledge of. Except, of course, the Ambassador, as well as military leaders in the area, called for additional security assistance days and weeks BEFORE the attacks. None was granted.

Finally, we were told that there was no way for anyone to know what was going on at the time of the attacks, a story that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is sticking to even today. Except that there were two (2) drones in the air observing the incident in real time. Not only that, but military assets, including the Delta Force special operations teams were standing by ready to deploy within minutes, yet they were told to wait – for what? – we can’t imagine.

An exclusive report from FoxNews now claims that the situation was much more clear than the administration has made it out to be, and that repeated real-time calls for assistance, while drones surveyed the area, were ignored.


Earlier this week President Obama, when answering a question from a reporter’s 6-year-old son, referred to as Governor Romney as a “bullshi\tter.”

Given what has transpired from the beginning of this President’s election campaign through today, it is clear that the bullsh!tter here is President Obama.

And for those apologist out there that will claim Mr. Obama was not the one making the decisions surrounding the Bengzahi incident, or that State was in charge, or that Secretary Panetta was making the military calls, we say BULL you know what.

President Obama is the Commander-In-Chief of  The United States of America. He, and he alone, is responsible for the deaths of the four Americans left to die that day. 

We had live, real-time video of the incident as it occurred. We had live, real-time communications from CIA assets that were within yards of the incident. We had CIA assets lazing targets for air strikes. We had direct requests for military assistance. We had four hours to respond.

And, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta claims we are all “Monday morning quarterbacks” for calling it like we see it?

We hold the utmost respect for our military and intelligence assets. We can not say the same for the leadership at the executive levels of our government. Four Americans died as a result of the incompetence of this President, and we’re only discussing it because whistleblowers within the military, intelligence community and the administration have felt compelled to provide the American public with information.


Moreover, President Obama recently met with the father of Tyrone Woods, one of the men killed in Bengzahi, and according to the elder Mr. Woods, the President couldn’t even look him in the eye when he spoke to him (apparently with little empathy or care) about the death of his son:

“When [Obama] came over to our little area” at Andrew Air Force Base, says Woods, “he kind of just mumbled, you know, ‘I’m sorry.’ His face was looking at me, but his eyes were looking over my shoulder like he could not look me in the eye. And it was not a sincere, ‘I’m really sorry, you know, that your son died,’ but it was totally insincere, more of whining type, ‘I’m sorry.’”

Woods says that shaking President Obama’s hands at his son’s memorial service was “like shaking hands with a dead fish.”

“It just didn’t feel right,” he says of his encounter with the commander in chief. “And now that it’s coming out that apparently the White House situation room was watching our people die in real time, as this was happening,” Woods says, he wants answers on what happened—and why there was no apparent effort to save his son’s life.

Our suspicion is that countless others have died over the last four years as a direct result of the incompetence of this President and his surrogates, except their stories have been covered up by giant piles of bullshiiiii-iiiiiiiiit.


4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 30, 2012 at 5:17 PM, drgroup (67.58) wrote:

This event smells reminiscent of Fast & Furious...

Report this comment
#2) On October 30, 2012 at 5:58 PM, L0RDZ (90.09) wrote:

What seems most messed up is  that it almost seems like  the  cia operatives  who  disobeyed  and  actually  left  to combat  the terrorists  were  purposefully  allowed  to later  get  killed  at  the  cia  safe-house  many  hours  later ~  despite  repeated  calls  for  assitance,  despite  them lazering  and  marking  the  enemy  combatants,  despite  a  lengthly  multi-hour  long  gun  battle ~  only   to  sucumb  to  enemy  mortars.

Those men  deserved better.

Tyrone Woods’ father, Charles Woods, is speaking out about the weird and disrespectful treatment he received from Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden.  He called into Glenn Beck’s show to say that Obama wouldn’t look him in the eye, Clinton made an astonishing promise to arrest and prosecute the makers of the “Innocence of Muslims” YouTube video rather than the terrorists, and Joe Biden asked him, “Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?”  To say that Tyrone Woods deserved better from this Administration is an understatement, especially now that we know CIA assets were told to stand by and watch him die.

Furthermore,  the  survivors  at  the  cia  safehouse  managed  to  capture several  of   the  attackers  of  the ambassador,  but  had  to relinquish  them  to the Libyan  forces.   What  ever  became  of  them ? 

The event  stinks  to high heaven  DR...


Report this comment
#3) On October 31, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Melaschasm (71.33) wrote:

I do not have any inside information, but I can make some guesses as to what really happened.

Obama and the democrats have long defered to our allies regarding foreign policy.  Obama helped the rebels in Libya because our allies in europe asked for his support.  The Obama administration probably believes their own press releases that we have an ally in Libya.  When a conflict started in Libya, Obama likely turned to our allies, including Libya for permission to send in help.  That request was denied and our ambassador and a few others were killed.

After Romney 'shot from the hip' by bringing attention to this terrible situation, Obama's advisors recognized how politically unpopular the truth would be and decided to cover up the situation.  As lies stacked upon lies were exposed, the truth became known.  Luckily for the democrats most of the truth is not being covered outside of the conservative press, which will help minimize the damage before the election.  If Obama is elected to a second term, this scandal will not go away, and it is going to get ugly.  

Making Bush's 'cowboy diplomacy' a central focus of attacks may have been good politics, but the democrats should not have believed their own rhetoric.  As many prior democrat adminstrations knew, the US should get the support of our allies when we can, and act alone when we must.  

Obama should have either acted alone, or stood on his so called principles and announced that we allowed our ambassador to die because we could not get enough international support to take action. 

Report this comment
#4) On October 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, L0RDZ (90.09) wrote:

Apparently,  no  good  deed goes  unpunished,  it's a  sad  pathetic  circumstance  to  read  about  how  those  two seal's  disregarded  a  direct order  to stand  down and actually  went  to save  our  ambassador  they even  managed  to  detain  at least  three  of  the attackers  and  had them back  at  the  cia  safe-house.

Despite repeated  radio  calls ( over multiple of  hours )   these  brave  men  fought  for  America,  they  bravely  defended  themselves  against  the terrorists  Obama  later would  deny,   one  of  them  manned  a   heavy  machine  gun and  took  the fight  to  the  attackers,  but  apparently  thanks  to  the  top brass  who  probably  we're  not happy  they  disregarded  the  direct command  to  not  intervene and stand down,   they simply  watched  as   two  brave  special force members  died  many  many many  hours  later.

How  does  the  vice  president respond ?  in  a  mostly bold and inappropriately  co-cky  manner  he asks  the father  about  the  size  of  balls  his  son  had ?? 

A  draft  dodging  piece  of   you know what  is  who  the POTUS  selected  as  his second,  but  hey  he's  like  the  drunk  uncle  we  all don't  love  at  family  picnics. 

This smells  far worse  than  any  water-gate  Nixon resigned  from.

Mister  Potus,  please say it isn't so ???


Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners