Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20)

Mysterious Trading Dynamics with VirnetX



February 07, 2013 – Comments (9) | RELATED TICKERS: VHC , AAPL , CSCO

Mysterious Trading Dynamics with VirnetX

Have you ever suspected a stock that you own is a target for manipulation?  The share price gets pushed around. Message boards and investor forums are infiltrated to spread negative views as if they are facts.  Traders and investors are fed a steady stream of fear, uncertainty and doubt, making one believe the stock is over-valued. This article is meant to shed some light on the rollercoaster ride of investing in volatile stock movements, such as my investment in VirnetX. An understanding of the ride may help you hold onto your shares of volatile but successful companies, ignoring the “noise” of short sellers..

There are powerful forces that are able to control and manipulate the share price of publicly traded companies. In regard to VirnetX (VHC), there are 15,033,619 shares that are documented as being "short." I have observed what appears to be synthetic shares created and then sold into market to either lower VirnetX's share price or cap a rally.  The biggest risk for short sellers is that a single positive binary event, such as the Judge issuing a final judgment against Apple (AAPL), a settlement from a litigant or non-litigant, a buy-out or a dividend can seriously spring VirnetX to higher ground. These scenarios will be explained in this article.

Preface: This article's publication is meant shed some light on the witnessed reverse conversions and the potential manipulation of the share price of VirnetX's stock. It is also written to inform people who want to understand the practice. The wild ride with VirnetX's stock is clear to those who are dedicated investors. For those who are not investors I have compiled a list of some trading days where the price was exacerbated through the use of synthetic shares created through reverse conversions. It provides insight to the wild share price ride.

●               January 16, 2013: Shares Down 3.3% on 1,857,228 shares traded while on public message boards a VirnetX patentwas allegedly invalidated by the Patent Office. In reality there was a non-final action and all claims will be reviewed. The patent remained fully intact and enforceable.

●               December 20, 2012: Shares Down 5.85% percent on 3,358,696 shares traded as post trial motions were heard before Judge Davis. The judge ordered Apple to provide updated sales date for certain unaccused and accused products, including the iPhone 5 by January 15, 2013. Kendall Larson stated "We look forward to the updated sales data from Apple so the Court can make an informed ruling on our request for judgment". This added request by the judge provides for a better informed judgment by Judge Davis; more informed judgments are less likely to be appealed.

●               July 26, 2012: Shares down 18.1% on 5,088,964 shares traded as Special K, now Value Bulldog, published an article titled "Do You Believe in Fairytales? Part 1". This article was used as sensational news firepower for shorts with fake shares to drive down the price of VirnetX, through guessing on what would happen without any compelling tangible evidence. Answering the four numbered parts in the article now;

1               VirnetX was vicorious at trial against Apple.

2               VirnetX was awarded a large amount against Apple with a second trial against Cisco and Avaya pending.

3               Apple does not have a customer-friendly workaround

4               The presiding judge in this case, Chief Judge Leonard Davis, is one of the most experienced intellectual property judges in the Federal Court system and has a exemplary track record with the Court of Appeals.

Many of  days with downward pressure have a headline or article associated, but in reality were non events.  The most powerful short sellers used these inaccurate stories to unload their fake shares to drive down the price. 

A positive binary event such as a settlement or positive judgment could lead to a big increase in the share price for VirnetX. This would push those who are short to go into the market and obtain the shares that they would have to deliver. Keep in mind that VirnetX average daily volume is 953,269 shares with more than 15,000,000 shares short and an unknown number of synthetic shares sold into the market. The price increase of the stock, coupled with the amount of shares needed to close out the various short positions would put additional pressure on the positive uptrend.

The number of share's short have recently been on a modest decline due to management's successful execution of their strategic plan.

An announced dividend would also hurt those short or manipulating VirnetX stock even more. Those who are short are force to pay the dividend to whomever purchased the stock.  In addition, reverse conversions create the synthetic shares that are sold into the market (naked short) with the dividend having to be paid by those who sold those shares.  This could cause massive losses for those major short sellers. Moreover, dividend reinvestment would reduce the number of legitimate shares available on the market, thus making the stock harder to short since shares would be harder to obtain, borrow and short. It would also be harder to keep these shares short if a quarterly dividend was enacted since the shorts would have to pay this four times per year.

on the reverse conversions are the more manipulative side of the trade. defines a reverse conversion as "A finance and risk management technique based on a put-call parity strategy that consists of selling a put and buying call (a synthetic long position), while shorting the underlying stock. As long as the put and call have the same underlying, strike price and expiration date, a synthetic long position will have the same risk/return profile as ownership of an equivalent amount of the underlying stock."

I have witnessed the execution of reverse conversions to create more shares for those who want to short the stock, but do not have access to inventory. They sell these shares themselves so they are not available for others to borrow and do not appear on the figures regarding shares available to short. In a reverse conversion, it is actually the market maker who is short the shares of the stock. Then the short seller sells the shares that he just bought from the market maker rendering the calls he just wrote as naked. The rules only allow the market maker thirteen days to be naked short. To circumvent that rule it's possible the market maker has another market maker use their own exemption so as to create shares he can buy to close his short. Although, in the case of an increase in price, the market maker has to close out their short position by obtaining shares through the calls they bought in the reverse conversion trade.

Some people ask why would someone have to go through all of this just to profit from a decrease in the price of VirnetX stock. The answer is that this situation is the alternative when there are not enough shares to borrow or they are too expensive to borrow. There are two sides to the situation, that being the short seller and the market maker.

The first party in this situation is the market maker who is in the game for the profit earned through commissions and earnings. The call protects the market maker from a rise in price and he is protected from a drop in price due to the shares he is short. The put closes out the shorted shares if the price drops when shares are put to the market maker.

Market Maker: Commissions and earnings

Motive: The Call

Rise in Price Protection: Shares Short

Drop in Price Protection: Closes out the shorted shares when shares are put

End GameUse created shares to influence the share price


The Market maker is short the stock, using the exemption not having to borrow. The market maker covers when he exercises that call that he made the person sell him who wants the created shares so the short seller can use them to influence the market price. This influence can be used as manipulation by selling the shares to kill rallies caused by positive news or exacerbate bad trading days.

Short Seller

Motive: Obtain shares too expensive to borrow

Long: Long the stock, long the put

Short: Short the call

Exposure: None until shares are sold

Manipulation: Selling the created shares, affecting the price.


The short seller is long the stock, long the put and short the call. The short seller has no exposure until he sells his shares in the market, thus affecting the price. Even though the short seller can affect the price negatively, if the price were to rise he would have to go into the market and purchase shares to cover the call that became naked when he sold the stock he received.

At this point those short have to (as discussed earlier) go into the market and purchase stock to deliver against the calls that were exercised. The number of shorts, coupled with the number of shares they would need to purchase, and mixed with a buying raid to cover their positions would lead to a massive increase in share price. Its one thing to have a normal market of buyers and sellers with a stock price that goes up in value, but its another when every short seller has to cover their then naked calls when the market maker exercises the calls against the short seller's naked call position.

The idea is a lot to grasp, although it is happening at VirnetX. Maybe a hedge fund was down slightly and decided instead of covering to just add to their short position. Or a fund thought VirnetX would not be able to prove infringement of their technology, assert their legal standing and develop their company so they wanted extreme profit at the stocks downside. They were looking for profit that was beyond simply shorting shares of the stock. To the defense of the short sellers, VirnetX was a David and Goliath story. How could some little company take on the technology giants of the world? As the story has unfolded, the reasons to be short have so diminished as to become non-existent.

If I may play devil's advocate, I feel there is no hard evidence of reverse conversions in black and white. Although, if evidence was that easy to find it would not be going on. Sometimes the instance of a reverse conversion can be found if there are very big, duplicate trades at an equal strike price for both the calls and puts. The idea is hard to track but any long-term VirnetX investor can attest to the manipulation in its price per share.

A recent example of these manipulative reverse conversions occurred on January 15, 2013. In the options market for VirnetX, two thousand puts and calls were traded using the $40 strike price with a March expiration. Traders are expecting an apple appeal 30 days within a February final judgment. This appeal will likely keep the share price below $40 so they would not have to go into the market to obtain the shares to satisfy delivery against the calls that would in essence, be naked. While all this is going on, there are 200,000 shares that were used to quash rallies and exacerbate declines.

On January 18 2013, those on the short side created 170,000 shares using a strike price of $40 using calls and puts that expire on February 16th. The shorts are becoming more exposed to risk since a final judgment from the Honorable Judge Davis would send shares higher, meaning the shorts would have to go into the market to obtain shares to cover their position. These real shares would be hard to find in a tightly held stock such as VirnetX, leading to a positive uptrend in shares. Not only would this cause the stock to decline once the newly acquired shares are sold into the market but it also serves to keep the stock below the strike price of the calls already written in the prior reverse conversion to preclude having to deliver shares on exercise.

Evidence of the manipulation of VirnetX's share price is well known by the market. Seeking Alpha author John H. Ford wrote a compelling article about a bear raid on the stock that took place on August 3, 2012. He stated in his article

"In the case of the recent VirnetX shareprice drop, the cause is attributable to short seller manipulation. Misinformation and obfuscation scared investors, hence the massive selloff."

John H. Ford was well aware of the bear raid that took place in the past, yet he stayed long VirnetX. The company has a bright future, there is no reason to give into bear raids and give up your shares based on emotion.

This article was not meant as a specific step-by-step guide to identify reverse conversions and manipulation, it is meant to be an abstract on the manipulation affecting VirnetX stock regarding a secretive practice. The manipulation affecting VirnetX's stock is a wild ride, although a settlement, ruling, dividend, buy-out, or any other positive event such as a litigant taking a stake in VirnetX can trigger a massive short squeeze rendering the price gain larger than normal since short sellers would have to go into the market to cover their short positions. Some reasons the short seller argument has faded are:

• VirnetX settled with Microsoft (MSFT) for $200 million in 2010.

• VirnetX has already triumphed over Apple in a court where every single claim was accepted for $368 million. The Judge now has every document and a final judgment can occur at anytime.

• An injunction against Apple is a possibility, more likely more negotiation power for VirnetX as discussed in my first article here.

• Cisco (CSCO) and Avaya are on schedule to go to trial in March, (this has not been postponed).

• Siemens (SI) has recently settled on 1/29/13 for a one-time payment and future royalties.

• NEC, Mitel and Astra have also settled.

• VirnetX's patents are continually confirmed by the USTPO, such as on 1/25/13 when 12 more patent claims were confirmed for VirnetX's '759 patent.

• Gabriel Connection Technology will be rolled out in the next six months to one year.

• "In December 2009, VirnetX announced that it had declared to the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) 23 patents and 28 patent applications as being "essential" to Advanced 4G wireless standards." (Moreno 7).

• VirnetX's essential patents can be described as "device patents", which cover how secure real-time communications will work on next-generation networks. They will license these patents on FRAND-based terms to product manufacturers. But VirnetX also owns "service patents". These patents cover the services required to manage secure domain names globally. This licensing model is not obligated by FRAND-based commitments and should generate a significant amount of revenue.". (Moreno 12); and.

• VirnetX owns the Secure SIP model.

For the reasons stated above, VirnetX is becoming a more and more distinguished company each day. They have proven technology and they have successfully fought for their right to collect on their inventions with Apple and Microsoft. One of the worst things an investor in VirnetX can do is sell their shares on a down day, giving them up. On the next day that VirnetX is down more than usual, look past the headline and try to find a substantive reason for the decline in price; you most likely will not find a good one.

Although most long investors only pay attention to the very successful long-term goals of the company, manipulation in share price on a day to day basis is frustrating. VirnetX will have a significant role in the future of 4G communications and secure domain services. Whatever the reason short sellers have not begun to cover is beyond common knowledge, although their bets have proven wrong and continually pulling on the bottom of an elevator that's going up will leave them hanging when it gets to the top.


This article after 20 revisions would not be published by seeking alpha mainsteam, it is my hope the news will spread from here and hopefully lead to more mainstream publication. 

To View this blog on Seeking Alpha, Click Here 



Disclosure: I am long VHC. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I want to thank Ming for his technical input in my writing of this article.This is not a substitute for your own research and may not be applicable to your situation. Always consult with a financial professional to discuss your situation and make sure it is right for you.



9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 07, 2013 at 12:02 PM, PityNoFooL (< 20) wrote:

You failed in provideing any real facts on Reverse Conversions the "assist" and "reset" of  these stock manipulators creating "FUNNY PAPER" (as coined by one of the Wolfson brothers). The Securities and Exchange Commission charged the two brothers living in Chicago and New York with naked short selling for failing to locate and deliver shares involved in short sales to broker-dealers. The details of which outline the entire process of how this works, and is alleged in the manipulations in VHC stock. For ref, you can search : SEC Release No. 66283 / January 31, 2012
File No. 3-14726

  How these trades are run by computers, quants and algos,  all legal and whatnot, is the norm today and a well publicized practice whenever a hiccup on in-house program fails; creating mini-crashes or an extended flash-crash occurs. It happens, expect it to happen more often going forward. However, this disparity in the playing field pails in comparison to what all this computerized trading was really intended to do; that is the  facilitating of  manipulation in a stock's price by bending and often times breaking the rules using "reverse conversions" "resets" and "assists" to simply create "Funny Paper."   It is this "Funny Paper"  in the Marketplace, having no bona-fide stock transaction as a basis,  which has created the single greatest disparity for all investors today.  By  design its sole intent is to benefit the creator of the paper in either short or long positions.  By design it is intended to avoid violating SEC's Reg. SHO.  More often than not, on a hourly basis, day-in day-out, it continues to succeed.

Report this comment
#2) On February 07, 2013 at 12:06 PM, PityNoFooL (< 20) wrote:


Report this comment
#3) On February 07, 2013 at 4:50 PM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

All of the information regarding reverse conversions is stated in the article. Moreover is the possible effect that it is having on VirnetX, it is my personal opinion that reverse conversions do affect VirnetX'a Stock.

 There are many examples, and other sources of disparity in the market such as computerized trading, but this is one that is lesser known in the market and specifically affects VirnetX.

All the best,


Report this comment
#4) On February 07, 2013 at 6:19 PM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

Actual Publication at Fool, not a blog Link

Report this comment
#5) On February 08, 2013 at 1:11 AM, constructive (99.97) wrote:

How many accounts did you create to rec your own post? Around 86?

Report this comment
#6) On February 08, 2013 at 1:34 AM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

No, the article was liked by many on Yahoo and Investor Village as well as other investors in the company who can connect with the content of my article.

All the best,


Report this comment
#7) On February 08, 2013 at 1:56 AM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

The article version of this is the fully completed version, It can be found on The Motley Fool at:



Report this comment
#8) On February 12, 2013 at 11:11 AM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

The Syndicated Article Version on can be found here:


My newest VHC article on Seeking Alpha regarding "Another Reason Why You Should Be Invested In VirnetX" can be found here



Report this comment
#9) On February 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, asdasdasdasdasd1 (< 20) wrote:

My latest VirnetX article about the Judges most recent order! 

Report this comment

Blog Archive

February (1)

Featured Broker Partners