Obama's Budget Makes Even Bush Look Responsible
That is the title of my article that appeared in the Rocky Mountain Collegian today. I recommend reading the whole article (I wrote it after all.) But after the Democrats got on their high horses and condemned the Repubs for spending too much, what do they do? They run a budget deficit 4x as big. Good work, you hypocrites. What a bunch of lying weasels. Rahm Emmanuel, Obama's Chief of, um, tax-evasion? Oh sorry, chief of staff, that's right, I remember now, said, "President Bush . . . ran up record deficits and added nearly $4 trillion to the national debt. Mr. President, we will be forever in your debt," Well, Mr. Emmanuel (and his name certainly shouldn't be intrepreted in a messianic way), look what your boss is doing. Anyway, enough ranting, read the article and leave your comments and criticisms please.
P.S. Shame on you Turbotax Timmy for lying through your teeth throughout the questions today.Trying to defend the indefensible (Obama's budget claiming GDP will only fall this year by 1% when we're already sinking at 6% per annum?) by saying quote, 1% is within a range of estimates. I'd like to know who is estimating better than -1%--even Mao would be ashamed of trying to put lipstick on this pig. At best, Mao's latest 5-year plan would have GDP growth flat--whereas real economists are looking at GDP growth of well under -5%. But whatever, I should have known the change would be cosmetic only.