Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

KDakotaFund (24.87)

Pelosi Stimulus Casts Shadow Over Obama, America, World

Recs

17

February 11, 2009 – Comments (4)

By John Browne @ Euro Pacific Capital

In a sign that may reveal much about the current deal-making environment in Washington, House speaker Nancy Pelosi has outmaneuvered the Obama Administration in the design of the massive $827 billion so-called Economic Stimulus Package. With the collusion of three moderate Republican Senators - Collins, Snowe and Specter - Pelosi may succeed in steering President Obama into supporting a package with which he may secretly disagree.

Despite the Presidential rhetoric of change, the Pelosi plan is Washington at its most habitual. Her version is a massive, pork-laden monster. Tilted heavily towards consumption, only 10 percent of the bill is allocated toward the infrastructure spending that the President talked about so frequently during the campaign. President Obama initially favored a middle-way. It was to be based on massive public spending, but specifically on infrastructure.

Far from restoring the economy to health, the 'pork-barrel' Pelosi plan will likely force the U.S. economy into the catastrophe of acute stagflation and decline, with grave long-term repercussions at home and abroad.

It is clear that we are now headed into an abnormally severe recession, and we may be face-to-face with Second Great Depression. Tell-tale symptoms of Depression include competitive currency devaluations and protective trade measures. Of even greater concern is the historic fact that trade wars too often lead to hot wars. The times of peace and unprecedented prosperity that we have enjoyed for decades are now under threat.

With the stakes this high, Pelosi should have restrained her urge to flex political muscle.

Most economists agree that America has enjoyed unprecedented prosperity, based primarily on excessive U.S. dollar liquidity and unmanageable levels of debt. Thus, any healthy correction would necessarily involve serious deleveraging and a severe recession. After a lot of pain, the economy would rebuild with healthier fundamentals. Infrastructure improvement would aid, but not cause, the eventual recovery.

Recession is the natural cure for the politically inspired profligacy that America has enjoyed for almost 40 years. Unfortunately, the side effects of this medicine, namely the rapid reallocation of labor resources and deflationary damage to debtors, are still unpalatable to pandering politicians.

The Washington regime, particularly members of the Democrat persuasion, leans towards a socialist solution of avoiding recession at any cost. After all, the bills are paid by others, such as taxpayers and holders of U.S. dollars. This results in an increasing amount of other peoples' money being spent on 'public' works that would in other times carry the label 'pork barrel.'

Washington is choosing to pursue the policy of continued and ever-increasing false prosperity, financed eventually by hyper-taxation, hyper-debt and hyper-inflation accompanied by a gradually eroded standard of living. The jobs created by the Bill are by and large non-productive, and will divert resources from the private sector and rob consumers of their power to make free choices in the marketplace.

America's infrastructure is in great need of restoration. By some estimates, for every $1 billion spent on infrastructure, some 35,000 real, wealth-creating jobs are born in the private sphere. For 'just' $100 billion, 3.5 million jobs would result. Furthermore, this middle-way of Obama's likely would have commanded much greater bi-partisan support than the lonely Republican trio which attached their names to Pelosi's bill.

Unfortunately for American and international investors, Speaker Pelosi pressured the President into the worst of all plans. It will likely bring on a economic catastrophe, characterized by depression followed by hyper-stagflation and civil unrest. Pelosi's power-play may buy her political status, but the entire world will pay the price.

4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, devoish (98.78) wrote:

Nice assemblage of buzzwords. The second to last paragraph with actual numbers is interesting. I don't think they work exactly as suggested though. The suggestion that 1bil can create 35,000 jobs at $28,000/job is nice but does not include the cost of cement, steel, etc. It also does not allow the jobs to last two years and many major projects will. So if you quadruple your spending you get the 3.5 mil $15/hour jobs lasting two years and the materials to support them. Total spending $400bil. Add in tax refunds to buy Republican support, then extend unemployment and S-chip and cobra for the 3.5 mil who have lost jobs and are not getting back to work from this stimulus, and you have todays $900bil stimulus package.

Report this comment
#2) On February 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, nthought (< 20) wrote:

Infrastructure is the most "porkish" of all spending on Capital Hill.  The notorious "bridge to nowhere" = infrastructure.

 

It would be much more constructive if people could avoid using loaded terms such as pork, or at least use the consistently, and just disagree on substance.   I know conservatives are going to be against a domestic spending bill, particularly one that directs funds to state and local government.  Its not pork though.  Most government spending is done locally.  This bill ensures that local governments don't gut their budgets at a time when we want them to spend. 

 

"This isn't a stimulus bill.  This is a spending bill!!!"

 

-John McCain

 

"This isn't a blog.  This is an internet site where users write and respond to each others opinons!"

Report this comment
#3) On February 11, 2009 at 6:34 PM, jeffduby (21.25) wrote:

I'll start off by saying that I agree with you that this bill is completely useless. However, it is my opinion that all stimulus packages will be useless, even if they are based on infrastructure.

The only problem with a stimulus package that includes a ton of infrastructure spending is that it will have a minimal impact on the current unemployment problems. This is because the areas hardest hit by the recession (finance, electronics, sales, autos) do not translate easily to construction. I don't know about you, but putting a financial advisor up on the high iron on a highrise sounds pretty rediculous to me. The end result will be the wholesale import of mexican laborers to fill the construction jobs, as companies will not be willing to pay full salaries to people with no construction work experience.

Report this comment
#4) On February 11, 2009 at 9:25 PM, devoish (98.78) wrote:

The only problem with a stimulus package that includes a ton of infrastructure spending is that it will have a minimal impact on the current unemployment problems. This is because the areas hardest hit by the recession (finance, electronics, sales, autos) do not translate easily to construction. I don't know about you, but putting a financial advisor up on the high iron on a highrise sounds pretty rediculous to me.

Then it important for you to actually look at what is in the stimulus spending. Modernizing/computerizing schools is electronics. Unemployed auto workers will gladly weld and assemble windmills. And I guarantee you every owner of a small construction business would happily employ his financial advisor and watch him leak yellow liquid from fifteen storys up. Believe me, we'd love to scuff up their manicures. Hell, its kind of fun to mess with the new guy when he hasn't cost us half our savings.

PS. Some financial advisors were Mexican.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement