Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Perth Mint Fraud Revealed



November 24, 2008 – Comments (6)

[This is going to take some time for me to go through all of this, but I thought all the gold and silver bugs would find this interesting, and would likely be able to agree or disagree with it or pick out any flaws in logic long before I will.]

Silver Stock Report by Jason Hommel, November 23rd, 2008

Of all the frauds that I work to expose, one of the hardest for people to see is the Perth Mint Fraud.  The Perth Mint has issued $1.5 billion in gold and silver certificates, for the express purpose of "working inventory," but it is probably being used for "legacy debt," and so, I believe most of it is totally unbacked, based on customer complaints and reports of how they operate. 

Some Perth customers can't see it, because they claim to be able to get silver or gold from Perth on a regular basis.  Clearly, banks can continue to operate on a 1% reserve requirement, and continue to pay out depositors, and stay in business, despite not having reserves to back up 99% of depositors.  Other customers are clearly able to see the fraud, based on the delays, high costs, and extra fees that the Perth Mint charges.

But a recent press release exposes their fraud even more than I ever did.

Mint suspends orders amid rush to buy bullion

Reportedly, the Perth Mint has suspended orders until January.  But, despite having $1.5 billion to be used for working inventory so that they can fill orders, they cannot fill orders. 

That should be enough to settle the matter.  It shows that if you have any Perth certificates, you should GET OUT. 

But there's more evidence:

Reportedly, "One European client purchased 30,000 ounces for $33 million."  The math is critically important here to show the fraud.  That purchase is for gold at $1100/oz.!  That's quite a bit above spot!  That's $350/oz. above spot!

Either Perth Mint is lying, or there is a very naive investor desperately trying to buy $33 million worth of Perth Mint overpriced gold.  Let's assume Perth is telling the truth about this purchase.

It actually costs the SAME amount to mint gold, as silver.  The only difference is that you need more capital costs, more gold, to mint gold, because some gold is always "in flux" in the minting process.  But with the Perth Mint having a reported $1.5 billion in silver and gold to be used for that, at zero interest rate, thanks to the certificate holders, this is not a cost for them.

So, if we assume $1/oz. in costs, then Perth has earned, on that one reported gold deal, at least $349 x 30,000, which is $10.4 million dollars.  This is important to note, because it's enough to fund the development of from 20 to 40 new mints with all state of the art equipment.  Therefore it's telling for me to read that they are working "non stop" to fill orders.  Why can't they spend money to expand capacity 20 to 40 fold?

I think it's because $10 million is not enough to pay back a $1.5 billion legacy debt.

What's more revealing is what I exposed in my last report:

Where's the Abundance of Perth Mint Rounds?!   September 6, 2008

I noted:  "If only 1/10th of the $880 million of gold and silver certificates is in silver (and they don't reveal what percentage it is), then that would be $88 million.  Divide by $13 = 6.8 million ounces of silver.  If that much were minted monthly, that would come out to 81 million one ounce rounds, which would be 4 times as many coins minted by the U.S. Mint."

Since that report, Perth revealed that their certificates are $1.5 billion, not the $880 million as of last year. 

Again, let's run some math.  If we assume 1/4 of the $1.5 billion is in silver, that's $375 million, at $10/oz, that's 37.5 million oz.  If we assume a minting turn around time of a full one month, that amount of "working inventory" could be used to mint (37.5 x 12) 450 million ounces per year.


The U.S. Mint only makes 20 million oz. per year, since doubling capacity in 2008!  Clearly, the Perth Mint is practicing "standard fractional reserve banking" type fraud, since they need to shut down because of too many orders.

This shows that probably 99% of Perth Mint issued certificates are fraudulent, and backed by nothing more than a promise to repay. 

Why is this important?  Because $1.5 million worth of investment demand was siphoned away from gold and silver and into Perth Mint gold and silver certifiate fraud instead.  If $1.5 million went into silver, instead, the silver price would probably be more than $25/oz.  That, according to Ted Butler, could have added about $10 billion worth to the existing stock of real silver, and another $10 billion in market cap to the silver stocks.  Fruad hurts more than just the people defrauded, it hurts the entire industry.  It also hurts the entire world.

I'm surprised that more people are not outraged by this fraud.

To see more of my reports on the Perth fraud, see here:

Where's the Abundance of Perth Mint Rounds?! September 6, 2008
Nadler, Kitco, Perth, Matthey; Sold Out! September 3, 2008
Perth Mint Crisis Watch 5 June 6, 2008
Perth Mint Crisis Watch May 23, 2008
Perth Mint Crisis: Solutions and Ramifications May 23, 2008
To the largest newspapers in Australia May 22, 2008
To the government of Western Australia May 21, 2008
Poor Prospects for Kitco/Perth/Matthey May 19, 2008 
Kitco / Perth Mint / AGR Matthey / Bullion Bank Connections May 17, 2008
Will Kitco Sue me?! May 16, 2008 
Silver Shortage Drives Men Nuts March 31, 2008
Perth Mint and Kitco Scheme Exposed March 26, 2008


Jason Hommel

6 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 24, 2008 at 4:01 PM, XMFSinchiruna (26.55) wrote:

You wouldn't catch me dead holding any gold certificates of any kind, nor any shares of supposed bullion ETFs.

Report this comment
#2) On November 24, 2008 at 5:24 PM, vooose (< 20) wrote:

That purchase is for gold at $1100/oz.!  That's quite a bit above spot!  That's $350/oz. above spot!

 No its not, its an australian article, and that gold price is in AUD.

Report this comment
#3) On November 25, 2008 at 5:36 PM, kdakota630 (29.06) wrote:

Nice pointing that out, Vooose.  You're absolutely right, and the author corrected that today.  Here's the link to the new one:


Report this comment
#4) On November 25, 2008 at 5:45 PM, mikejw (38.87) wrote:

Jason Hommel has a tendency to tell "half truths."  I sent him an e-mail when he was misrepresenting one of the companies I was invested in and all it took was to look at their website to find out the location of their mines.  After that, I stopped receiving his article updates via e-mail and stopped reading his website.


Report this comment
#5) On November 25, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Goldbug7 (< 20) wrote:

Jason Hommel is a known Scamster and Hack. Making allegations without fact-checking is the norm for him. Making a mistake between the USD$ and the Australian$ is so embarassing for him. Then he states that he wants the Perth Mint to sell to the public client owned holdings that are in a storage agreement?? What nonsense. Perth Mint cannot sell or lease the clients holdings. How do I know? My family has been a client of theirs for some time, the policy is clear. I have been there myself and am satisfied. Government guaranteed, AAA rated and insured by Lloyds, audited by PriceWC. So if the Perth Mint is acting like other mints and have temporarily suspended new buys from off the street, I checked with my Perth Dealer and have been assured the PMCP and PMD are running and purchases/sells can be made right now. Look at Jason H's website, its disgusting, read the "3.  We may edit your article so much that we become "co-authors". " (He also applies this to emails) on his website under his terms and conditions here: Consider the source!

Report this comment
#6) On November 25, 2008 at 7:28 PM, kdakota630 (29.06) wrote:

Mikejw, and Goldbug7, thanks for the feedback.  I don't really follow precious metals that closely, so I didn't really know what Jason Hommel was like, but he sounded interesting.

I posted the blog mainly because this "expert" was calling the Perth Mint a scam which I found rather shocking since Peter Schiff (who I really like) has written so highly about them.

While you can find anything negative about anything on the internet, I did find this passage about Jason Hommel rather enjoyable.


I think I'll unsubscribe from his future newsletters.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners