﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>TMFKopp's Blog</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/</link><description /><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 05:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>TAG! You're Insured... for $1.4 trillion</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=777065&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Was it even possible to keep up with all of the acronyms introduced during the financial crisis in the name of stability? Well, if you're a bank investor, one in particular ought to be on your radar right now: the Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;TAG insured all non-interest-bearing transaction accounts with balances above $250,000 and did so with no separate assessment by the FDIC. This essentia...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:28:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Goldman Conspiracy Strikes Again</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=777056&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;If you dig a good conspiracy, you can add the Bank of England's appointment of Mark Carney as its new head. Why? Well, as&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/bank-of-englands-new-leader-a-member-of-the-government-sachs-club/" target="_self"&gt;Mike De La Merced points out&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;in Dealbook, he's yet another &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Goldman Sachs &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: GS) alum in a powerful go...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:06:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Caution: CyberWars in Banking Ahead!</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=777051&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Speaking in Germany, Atlanta Fed head Dennis Lockhart opined on some sources of financial instability that may be off the radar for some people. One key area he highlighted was cybercrime. Most folks reading this have probably at some point been the victim of identity theft ([hand raised], three or four times). But Lockhart is thinking bigger.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;From his speech:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;quot;A ...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:52:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Banking Deals On the Way?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=777043&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/177_226/new-capital-raises-fuel-big-m-and-a-predictions-for-chicago-1054599-1.html?ET=americanbanker:e13204:2366049a:&amp;st=email&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ABLA_Daily_Briefing_112612" target="_self"&gt;American Banker notes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;that &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Taylor Capital &lt;/strong&gt;(Nasdaq: TAYC), Standard Bancshares, and &lt;strong rel="...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:22:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Buffett and Taxes for the (800th??) Time</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776971&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Warren Buffett was back at it&lt;em rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;again&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#160;with the whole &amp;quot;rich people need to pay more taxes&amp;quot; thing. For those with trouble connecting the dots, well, The Fool's Morgan Housel is here to help out (&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/11/26/warren-buffett-on-taxes.aspx). " rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/11/26/warren-buffett-on-taxes.aspx)...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:30:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>MBIA Lives to Fight Another Day</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776923&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;MBIA &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: MBI) is continuing to limp along, now getting the debt-term changes it was hoping for and &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bank of America &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: BAC) was vehemently fighting against. What is this big change? Essentially it lifts the provision that if MBIA Corp. (which did all the nasty structured-bond insuring) went into rehab or liquidation that the entire company would b...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:21:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>So That's What Happened to Countrywide and BAC...</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776908&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Some research took me back to&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/25191/000110465906012770/a06-2962_110k.htm#Item7_ManagementsDiscussionAndAna_033114" target="_self"&gt;Countrywide's 2005 annual report&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;today. It's funny looking back at it in retrospect because so much looks painfully obvious. Take this, for instance, from right at the beginning of the Management's Discussion section:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:40:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is a Smaller BAC a Better BAC?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776892&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;My fellow Fool Amanda Alix has been skeptical on&amp;#160;&lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bank of America&lt;/strong&gt;'s (NYSE: BAC) so-called &amp;quot;Project New BAC&amp;quot; and builds on that wary view today in&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/11/26/is-the-project-new-bac-train-headed-for-a-crash.aspx" target="_self"&gt;her article on Fool.com&lt;/a&gt;. She's less than convinced that the &amp;quot;cut, cut, ...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:14:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>One Hobbling Knight for Sale!</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776891&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;In&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/11/26/will-knight-capital-get-bought-out.aspx" target="_self"&gt;article on Fool.com earlier today&lt;/a&gt;, I opine on the&amp;#160;potential for &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Knight Capital &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: KCG) to get bought out -- which is a very real potential given the latest news reports. For individual investors, the goodness/badness of a Knight sale (or...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:54:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Insurance Mess Over Sandy</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776852&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Reading&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/23/us-storm-sandy-insuranceclaims-idUSBRE8AL04S20121123?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=PersonalFinance" target="_self"&gt;this Reuters coverage&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;of post-Sandy insurance squabbles is sure to make you grit your teeth. Of course while it's easy to root for the homeowners that have been through hell -- and apparently still going through it -- versus the big insura...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:14:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Should JPMorgan Be Back on the Hook for Madoff?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776838&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/21/us-madoff-banks-appeal-idUSBRE8AK1BY20121121?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=PersonalFinance" target="_self"&gt;Reuters notes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;that the trustee going after money for&amp;#160;Madoff victims is hoping to reinstate $30 billion or so in claims against &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;JPMorgan &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: JPM) and other banks. According to Reuters:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p rel="nofollow...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:08:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>UBS Fined for Losing Money</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776831&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;From a certain perspective, you've got to chuckle at the idea that &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;UBS &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: UBS) is&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/ubs-fined-47-5-million-in-rogue-trading-scandal/?nl=business&amp;emc=edit_dlbkam_20121126" target="_self"&gt;getting fined almost $50 million&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;for allowing rogue trader Kweku Adoboli to lose $2.3 billion. It's a little like getting ...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pondering a Barclay's IB Spin-Off</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=776829&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/efae0c36-35a6-11e2-bf64-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2DHyzmfPQ" target="_self"&gt;The &lt;em rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;FT &lt;/em&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;that &lt;strong rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Barclays &lt;/strong&gt;(NYSE: BCS) might be getting a push from its shareholders to spin off its investment banking -- or, at least, cut back drastically. In terms of &amp;quot;good idea / bad idea,&amp;quot; it m...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:55:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Did I Fail?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=634527&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Have I fallen down on my pledge? Was I distracted by the shiny object in the corner?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Earlier this week, I published an article &amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/08/22/confessions-of-an-add-investor.aspx" target="_self"&gt;Confessions Of An ADD Investor&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; in which I pledged to do pitched battle with the many distractions of our modern world and focus in...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:16:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Keeping an eye on Medtronic</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=619672&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Back in early June I did&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2011/06/06/could-medtronic-double-your-money.aspx" target="_self"&gt;a rundown of expected returns&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;for Medtronic's stock. The outcome of my mid-case scenario was 9.7% per year -- not terrible, but not great and less than what I typically look for when I'm adding to my portfolio.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Fast forward to ...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:53:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Awww, poor silver</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=590059&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Is it just me, or do precious metals investors seem to have&amp;#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-russell-didnt-like-all-the-gloating-about-the-silver-crash-2011-5" target="_self"&gt;very delicate sensibilities&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Matt&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 12:38:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Doh! Missed a Perfect Opportunity!!! </title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=561923&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;This is probably because I'm a bit of a masochist, but for some reason I decided to go back and reread this rebuttal to my rebuttal of a HuffPo article (&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-solin/foolish-advice-from-the-m_b_795385.html" target="_self"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-solin/foolish-advice-from-the-m_b_795385.html&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I realized that I totally missed the fol...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:42:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Good Media Strategy Trumps Facts</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=466727&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Poll-Americans-Dont-Know-bloomberg-2909319248.html;_ylt=AlOsTe7U6EbIxZk01JktAc27YWsA;_ylu=X3oDMTE1b2t0MmltBHBvcwM1BHNlYwN0b3BTdG9yaWVzBHNsawNwb2xsYW1lcmljYW4-?x=0&amp;sec=topStories&amp;pos=2&amp;asset=&amp;ccode=" target="_self"&gt;Poll: Americans Don't Know Economy Expanded With Tax Cuts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;(sigh)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollo...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:00:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dividends, Treasuries, Inflation, and the Cheapness of Stocks</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=453447&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Today I posted an article regarding &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2010/09/29/are-stocks-actually-cheap.aspx" target="_self"&gt;the issue of earnings yields versus bond yields&lt;/a&gt; and whether that can point us towards an overvalued or undervalued market. For those interested in the subject, I really encourage a read of a paper that Alex Dumortier pointed me towards -- &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.som.yale.edu/Faculty/jkt7/otherpapers/Asness.pdf...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:15:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Totally Off Topic: The Quest to Eliminate Cable</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=451495&amp;t=01006703192846365650</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;If you think the title is somehow a trick and that this is actually going to be about investing... it's not... the following is &lt;em rel="nofollow"&gt;not &lt;/em&gt;going to be about investing. So leave now before you start getting angry that I could possibly have something other than investing on my mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Now, if you, like me, have a deep-seated hatred of the inane amount of money you have to spend on cable TV, then the following might interest you (or perhaps you ...</description><author>TMFKopp</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:56:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>