﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>TheBarnacle's Blog</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/</link><description /><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 05:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Are we running out of value picks.</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=811580&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Just ran my deep value screen, and it appears that only three picks are available.&amp;#160; As of this month, seem to be limited to BRLI, FRAN, and ZUMZ.&amp;#160; As usual, I'm focused on clean debt sheets, cash flow, and a decent GARP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:44:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Still Holding to Original Prediction</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=772426&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I have been holding the theory that Obama will win on November 6.  Nothing has changed that position.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I find it interesting that the blog sit 538 gives Obama a 79% chance of winning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Using data from 1920 to present, I see Obama with a 88.4% chance of winning, and a 98% chance of doing better than 1.7%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Using data from 1892 to present, it is...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:22:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama Has It Locked Up</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=766197&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;There are debates, and then there are facts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;The recent unemployment report brought the 4 year Misery Index to 9.1.&amp;#160; This is a full 1 point better than it was when Obama was re-elected.&amp;#160; Additionally, we've seen the S&amp;amp;P improve an annulized 11.7% since the 2008 elections.&amp;#160; This overwhelms the previous quadrennial average of -2.8%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;There are too many econom...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:18:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama Closing in On Re-election</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=754587&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;With the new unemployment data, and the improved S&amp;amp;P 500, Obama now has a 77% to 86% chance of winning this November.&amp;#160; There is not much Romney can do.&amp;#160; Even the recent CNN poll has Obama in the lead by 7.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;It is now just a matter of how much.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:41:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama's Chances in Four Months</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=747371&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Since my May post, the misery index has remained at 9.6%, and the annualized growth of the S&amp;amp;P 500 since November 1, 2008 has dropped to 9.53% (far better than the annualized decline of -6.8% during Bush's second term).&amp;#160; With these factors taken into consideration, Obama has a 76%-85% probability of being re-elected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;We are in unchartered territory when it comes to some of the data.&amp;#160; Only twice i...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:13:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>It Will Always Be About The Economy!</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=731631&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Now that it seems to be Obama v. Romney 2012, it is worth pointing out some key economic&amp;#160;measures that will be indicators of who will win.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;At election time in 2008, the unemployment rate was 6.6% with an annualized inflation rate of 3.6%; giving us a misery index of 10.2%.&amp;#160; Ironcially, that was above the brightline of 10% that my political scientist father noted as a key stat indicating that the cont...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:14:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>GARP for the long haul</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=553106&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I am strictly a GARP trader, and tend to buy and hold for a long time, sometimes for five years.&amp;#160; I first entered The Fool on Ocotber 30, 2006.&amp;#160; On that day, I said the following stocks would outperform the market (S&amp;amp;P 500 average is -1.15% since then):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;BVN (34.5%), CECO (1.28%), CEO (28.26%), CHS (-12.32%), CRYP (-49.45%), EOG (11.71%), ERES (-3.97%), HWAY (-22.23%), MMSI (2.09%), NTE (-10.14%),...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:56:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FXEN.  Seriously?  Are you kidding?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=552671&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Someone please explain this to me.&amp;#160; It has a P/E of 70.57,&amp;#160;&amp;#160; The P/S is 17.53 and the P/B is 27.4, and the price has more than double in the past year.&amp;#160; While the growth rate is decent, this stock has the potential to drop an additional 14%&amp;#160;on top of the 12% drop it took today.&amp;#160; This stock has too much debt and is too rich.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:50:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>BVN Looks Golden</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=550693&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;This stock has hit my screen off and on over the past seven or so years.&amp;#160; Once again, it's beginning to look like a buy.&amp;#160; The P/E of 18.14 with a historical growth rate of 19.95 makes it a buy.&amp;#160; With a quick ratio of 3.51, net income of $662 million, cash flow of $734 million, sales of $1.1 billion, and with NO DEBT, it is a safe buy.&amp;#160; It looks like owning a gold company is a better investment than owning gold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:48:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Christmas List for GARP Investors</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=483785&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;These stocks should be on the buy list for the investor that looks for growth at a reasonable price.&amp;#160; All have great balance sheets, low debt, and heavy cash flows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;EZPW (P/E = 13.9, Growth = 22.5%)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;FSLR (P/E = 17.46, Growth = 55.5%)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;GES (P/E = 16.29, Growth = 24.3%)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;GRMN (P/E = 9.21, Growth = 24.9%...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:41:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mr. Market is a little too fat from Thanksgiving turkey</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=482176&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I just ran my parameters, and it appears that there are no new stocks on my horizon.&amp;#160; Yet BEXP, NFLX, FXEN, CRM, and TZOO are a little to fat from the holiday bird.&amp;#160; When this dynamic occurs, it is a personal indicator that the market is too frothy and will hit a downward trend.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;In the meantime, have a great holiday season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:36:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>This one must fall.</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=481196&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;My jaw dropped with I saw CRM with&amp;#160;a P/E of 261.89. The earnings would have to improve over 500% to get the P/E down to a reasonable level of 40 or below. I'm not sure how that is going to come from sales, because the P/S is over 11 and the P/B is over 15. With this stock up 128%, it has to go down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:51:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>TZOO cannot keep it up.</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=479348&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I just don't understand why this stock continues to sell well with such ridiculous ratios. P/E is 59, P/S is 6 and P/B is 15.5. After a run up of 180%, this has got to slow down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:56:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where is Mr. Market taking us?</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=463235&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;I am not sure whether to bid up or down on this market.&amp;#160; BLUD, RIMM, and GES look interesting, but nothing new is hitting my screens.&amp;#160; Yet, there seems to be nothing to short either.&amp;#160; I am just not sure where things are going.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:12:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Metals Play</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=424185&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Add these to your metals portfolio.&amp;#160; They are best in&amp;#160;industry plays, and are diversified with the metals sector.&amp;#160; All of these have strong margins and they are flushed with cash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;BVN&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;SCCO (I actually own this one)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;GNI&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:22:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Final GARP picks for July 2010</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=424144&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Finally, also&amp;#160;added&amp;#160;crmt and apsg&amp;#160;to my list for upside potential.&amp;#160; All three have bulletproof balance sheets and growth rates that exceed the price to value.&amp;#160; We will see a year from now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:07:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>More GARP picks for July 2010</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=424143&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Also&amp;#160;added&amp;#160;matk, gymb, and fds&amp;#160;to my list for upside potential.&amp;#160; All three have bulletproof balance sheets and growth rates that exceed the price to value.&amp;#160; We will see a year from now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:06:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>GARP Picks for July 2010</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=424142&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Just added www, ravn, and nke to my list for upside potential.&amp;#160; All three have bulletproof balance sheets and growth rates that exceed the price to value.&amp;#160; We will see a year from now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:04:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can't find anything to recommend</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=400878&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;Did my monthly run of my GARP screen.&amp;#160; I can honestly say that there is not much out there.&amp;#160; SYNT, NTES, JCOM, and HANS, pop up, but I recommended those some time back.&amp;#160; There is nothing new on the horizon.&amp;#160; This is usually a good indicator, for me, to slow down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:17:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>It's still the economy, stupid.</title><link>http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=66077&amp;t=01007995791167760932</link><description>&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;With this new two year low in the stock market, I will be&amp;#160;interested in seeing how it will affect the upcoming election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;#160;One thing I will be looking at is the &amp;quot;misery index&amp;quot;.&amp;#160; If the four-year annualized inflation rate and the unemployment rate add to more than 9.5%, then McCain is in serious trouble.&amp;#160; Not his fault, but history shows that a &amp;quot;throw the bums out&amp;quot; mentality will occur for the Republicans if this nonsen...</description><author>TheBarnacle</author><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:33:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>