Save the planet and pass the Kool-Aid
The Economist, a longtime friend to global warming proponents, has reported that the alarming prediction by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the immanent demise of the Himalayan glaciers in 2035 is simply not true.
Although over 40,000 comments were made during the IPCC review process, not a single one recognized that the source for their data, an article entitled Down to Earth, was:
A) Looking at all of the world’s glaciers (not just Himalayan glaciers);
B) The research was looking at prospects for 2350 not 2035!
The IPCC issued a statement on 1/20/2010: “the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly.”
My question is, just how many more of the IPCC’s apocalyptic prognostications are the result of cannibalizing/manipulating “bad science/data”?
Here is a link to the article below: http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displayStory.cfm?story_id=15328534&source=features_box1