Separate but equal (two conflicting healthcare proposals)
It is sad that the two parties cannot work out a compromise way of not getting healthcare. I have an idea. Let us deny coverage to Republicans separately and to Democrats separately, in a way that's most acceptable to the respective parties. Thus Republicans will be spared the heathcare tax, and will be given the opportunity to make an out-of-pocket payment to HMOs for the denial of healthcare. On the other hand, Democrats will not pay out of pocket but instead will be liable for obamataxes, and will get healthcare denied by the HMOs that will in turn get paid by the government intermediary. I think this will be a beautiful solution that will fall nicely under the category of "separate but equal". The fact that in the end healthcare will be denied by HMOs to both parties alike will guarantee equality, and the freedom to sign up or not to sign up for obamacare will guarantee the "separate" part. This would be a great example of democracy in action. I think we should all respect each other's differences because I strongly believe that there should exist more than way of getting no healthcare.