Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

unkownuser (98.42)

Sequenom will SOAR!!!

Recs

3

November 29, 2011 – Comments (6) | RELATED TICKERS: SQNM

The MaterniT21 blood test that was developed and is being marketed by Sequenom will ultimately replace the current diagnostic tools, amniocentesis & chorionic villus sampling (CVS). The amnio causes about a 1 in 200 incidence of miscarriage, it is a very high risk procedure and one of the reasons that it is only offered to women at high risk for a Down Syndrome baby.

 

Sequenom's MaterniT21 blood test diagnoses Down Syndrome with a simple blood draw from mom as early as 10 weeks into the pregnancy. The cost is $1900, which is FAR less than the cost of an amniocentesis, and more importantly carries ZERO risk of miscarriage. According to Sequenom, despite the $1900 price tag, NO expectant mom will have to pay more than $230 out of pocket for the test. This is by far the lower risk, lower liability, more cost effective option for those moms who want to know if the child they are carrying has Down Syndrome (or some of the other trisomy aneuploidies).

 

Did I mention that the test has been clinically validated by several studies that have been published in peer-reviewed journals such as Genetics in Medicine, and the British Journal of Medicine?

 

Sequenom has already completed the initial roll out of the test and it is available in 20 major cities throughout the US. Expansion plans are already under way, and a North Carolina site has been chosen as the home for their East Coast facility.

 

The only remaining variable (and this will come out over the next couple of months or so) is how well the test is being recieved, i.e. demand. This is the only variable left open to question. The test is a lower cost/lower liability option that insurance companies will DEMAND. What insurer would be willing to cover a physician who incurs a miscarriage during an amniocentesis, when a simple blood test was available at half the cost? How many LOW RISK pregnant women will have Down Syndrome babies, and then sue their doctor because he/she neglected to mention that a simple blood draw could have provided them with advance notice in the first trimester (not a pleasant thought, but it is much easier to get a 'termination' in the first trimester).

 

The availability of genetic screening with a simple blood draw does raise some serious ethical and moral questions; however it is coming and those who want it will STEAMROLL any obstacles in their path. Sequenom is at the leading edge of this technology and has PATENTED the process of interrogating the fetal DNA through maternal blood sampling. Others may try to bring similar tests to market but they will face some heady legal challenges if they dare, and ultimately will pay licensing fees to Sequenom. 

 

Sequenom will be HUGE! 

6 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On November 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM, unkownuser (98.42) wrote:

Watch out for bashers! There is a small contingent of shorts that have been frequenting the popular stock message boards with misinformation and sometimes outright lies about SQNM.

Do your own due diligence and you will see why Sequenom insiders have been buying the stock like crazy ever since the Oct 17, 2011 launch of the MaterniT21 blood test.

Report this comment
#2) On November 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, hollandjoey1 (< 20) wrote:

Just a couple of corrections:

 

 $1900 is not far less than an amnio in fact its higher.

1 in 200 incidence of miscarriage for amnio is an out right lie, if that was the case no one would opt for amnio for any test.

There is no possible way to guarantee the minimum any mother would have to pay out of pocket.

 

Aside from those three gross lies the rest of your pumping baseless comments are some excellent fluff!

Report this comment
#3) On December 01, 2011 at 11:15 AM, unkownuser (98.42) wrote:

Hmmm, just as I said in my first post... surprised it took so long for you to show up.

 Facts are facts, when you add up the total cost of an amnio (which includes an utrasound, facility fee, etc etc) the cost far outstrips that of the MaterniT21 blood test.

As for your dispute over the incidence of miscarriage during amnio, that info is easily googled and I leave it to the readers to check the facts for themselves.

Report this comment
#4) On December 01, 2011 at 11:25 AM, unkownuser (98.42) wrote:

http://miscarriage.about.com/od/pregnancyafterloss/f/amniocentesis.htm

 

I searched several sites about incidence of miscarriage during amniocentesis; the common report is 0.05% or 1 in 200 (as I stated). Some sites will further qualify the risk as 1 in 400 to 1 in 200, depending on the facility. Still other sites report that the research this 1in 200 is based upon is over 30yrs old.

The point however is moot, as my facts have been confirmed.

Report this comment
#5) On December 02, 2011 at 7:25 PM, unkownuser (98.42) wrote:

Sorry for the incorrect decimal point placement in my prior post:

0.05% should have been 0.5%... in any event, the 1 in 200 incidence mentioned is correct. Despite the fact that there is some dispute over the 1 in 200 incidence, the only research used by the experts to report this figure is dated and until a follow up study is performed, this is the official line from the OB/GYN community.

I read one site that claims the incidence is 1 in 400 for facilities that ROUTINELY perform the amniocentesis procedure; but in other locations where it is not routinely performed, the incidence is still 1 in 200, or 0.5%... 

 

Report this comment
#6) On December 04, 2011 at 9:11 PM, eileen1023 (36.07) wrote:

i had this stock for a little over a year. sold it a few months ago, I lost a few dollars and I am thinking I may have made a mistake?

Going to watch it more closely and may invest some again?

Report this comment

Blog Archive

2011
November (1)
2007
February (1)

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement