Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

portefeuille (99.83)

statistics

Recs

3

April 09, 2010 – Comments (8)

some statistics for my 12 "caps" game players.

I start with the easy ones, not sure I am not too lazy for the more difficult ones.

 

8 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On April 09, 2010 at 8:41 PM, portefeuille (99.83) wrote:

so if you take out my loser portefeuille12 I currently have all players in the "top66" as to "score points" and in the "top53" as to "outperform score points". there is quite a bit of "overlap" and I might add some statistics that try to quantify the "amount of overlap".

Report this comment
#2) On April 09, 2010 at 8:56 PM, portefeuille (99.83) wrote:

 

To minimise the effect of the calls I make I have started giving most of the new calls the "time frame" "few weeks" and also changed the "time frame" of quite a bit of the older ones to "few weeks" and by now at least 1/3 of the "active" calls should have no effect on the "star ranking system" and in a few weeks around 90% of my "active" calls will have no direct influence.

Report this comment
#3) On April 09, 2010 at 9:39 PM, dragonLZ (99.77) wrote:

+ 1 rec for the performance of your players.

Report this comment
#4) On April 09, 2010 at 10:54 PM, rancidx3 (49.99) wrote:

Do you treat these players differently or are they just an extension of your main profile?

Report this comment
#5) On April 09, 2010 at 11:37 PM, portefeuille (99.83) wrote:

I treat them differently. My main player portefeuille usually gets to make the calls I consider the best (when I make them). I might write something about their different strategies later. So far I "exported" all the data into a spreadsheet (via copy&paste. I hate it!). First result. I have made 4806 calls and the "average pick score" for those is around 28.93 (139015.81 score points, hehe ...).

Report this comment
#6) On April 10, 2010 at 12:33 AM, portefeuille (99.83) wrote:

sum of score points for some stocks.

HGSI 6240.50
MTL 5374.74
DNDN 3649.78
LVS 3025.85
GMK 2395.01
BCS 2301.22
FACT 2145.56
BAC 1778.55
ATPG 1773.32
IP 1491.53
AIXG 1441.18
PCX 1391.52
KFN 1355.60
DB 1339.09
XL 1334.42
HUN 1328.01
INCY 1279.08
DOW 1261.06
FITB 1189.84
BIDU 1133.44
MGM 1131.74
PKD 1130.31
IRE 1108.50
IO 1046.51
NYT 1031.21
GGP 1025.57
WYNN 981.56
FCX 944.33
HIG 943.58
MBT 913.31
FIG 876.70
NG 793.54
LYG 722.53
AIB 699.57
DDR 688.02
FLEX 686.75
FMCN 633.51
AMZN 626.46
BASFY.PK 592.97
NILSY.PK 581.31
MBI 574.17
AER 561.72


ISIS -353.52
GERN -354.68
MDVN -366.37
DRYS -390.19
LXRX -428.45
PARD -500.11
HLCS -603.50
OMEX -992.52

Report this comment
#7) On April 10, 2010 at 1:39 AM, TMFCrocoStimpy (95.01) wrote:

Porte, I'm curious about why you would want to minimize the effect of your picks on the CAPS rating.  Is it simply because you have overlap between the portfolio compositions?

-Xander

Report this comment
#8) On April 10, 2010 at 2:15 AM, portefeuille (99.83) wrote:

#8 yes, that is the reason.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement