Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

portefeuille (99.73)

stock picking

Recs

9

June 21, 2012 – Comments (9)

I think either portefeuille or portefeuille2 should be given the "caps" game stock picking award (were it to exist), at least for the "early 2009 until now" period.

I am not sure whether portefeuille has done better than portefeuille2 (in stock picking). I am pretty sure that no player not on the following list has done better than the best portefeuille player. And the non-portefeuille players on that list all have a major problem. They have "not so great annualised returns".

 



enlarge

(from here -> "Top Outperform Players" -> "refresh" (if some error page appears))

 

Thus, so far, I win, I think, hehe.

 

9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On June 21, 2012 at 10:20 PM, portefeuille (99.73) wrote:

refresh

try again

 

 

evolution of the "top outperform members" list (see this post).

June 17, 2009 -> June 8, 2010 -> June 2, 2011 -> August 8, 2011 -> June 21, 2012.

portefeuille2 6 -> 7 -> 9 -> 5 -> 1

portefeuille 1 -> 5 -> 11 -> 7 -> 2

redneckstocks ? -> 11 -> 2 -> 1 -> 3

2009pix ? -> 12 -> 5 -> 6 -> 4

translator999 2 -> 2 -> 3 -> 2 -> 5

venividiveci ? -> 8 -> 4 -> 4 -> 6

mviscio1 ? -> ? -> ? -> 16 -> 7

2009picks ? -> 6 -> 14 -> 12 -> 8

lanterntrades 5 -> 1 -> 34 -> 8 -> 9

trackjimcramer ? -> ? -> ? -> 13 -> 12

portefeuille3 10 -> 9 -> 18 -> 14 -> 13

Report this comment
#2) On June 21, 2012 at 10:33 PM, portefeuille (99.73) wrote:

My "specialty" is probably biopharma stock picking, so if you want to make a "caps" game call on a biopharma stock (or buy/sell some) you might want to consider what the following people have to say (and not necessarily listen to those "90% accuracy 'caps' game players").

http://twitter.com/portefeuillefun/following

(featuring zzlangerhans and momentum21)

Report this comment
#3) On June 21, 2012 at 11:04 PM, awallejr (78.52) wrote:

Sorry Port but the only relevant award is the "how much REAL money did you make in the end" award;p

Report this comment
#4) On June 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Valyooo (99.30) wrote:

We are playing the CAPS game here, not the stock picking game...you have to adjust your strategies to win the game you are playing, not the game you want to be playing. 

 

Also this is similiar to your "returns with dsco, returns without dsco" kind of nonsense, hehe

Report this comment
#5) On June 22, 2012 at 11:05 AM, portefeuille (99.73) wrote:

"returns with dsco, returns without dsco"

That was to seperate a "performance dominating" ("large volatility and size") position from the rest.

People that think development stage biopharma stocks should be evaluated on the basis of "book value" or "market capitalisation divided by number of active clinical trials" are free to not bother "following" any of those I follow on twitter ...

Report this comment
#6) On June 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM, portefeuille (99.73) wrote:

#5 ... the rest is free to do that as well, I just think it is a bad idea ...

Report this comment
#7) On June 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Mega (99.96) wrote:

I had never noticed this before.  I'm currently ranked #28 overall, but am the #34 underperform player. Which suggest picking underperform picks has been a lot easier than picking outperform picks the last few years.

Report this comment
#8) On June 22, 2012 at 10:13 PM, awallejr (78.52) wrote:

Nature of the game.  It is much easier to red thumb 1 star garbage, than green thumbing stocks that will outperform the market.  Also this game doesn't treat dividend stocks fairly, mainly because it would "break the game." 

Report this comment
#9) On June 22, 2012 at 10:42 PM, portefeuille (99.73) wrote:

this game doesn't treat dividend stocks fairly

It more or less treats them the way it should treat them, see comments #30,31 here and comment #3 here.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement