Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Lordrobot (89.73)

Suicide short sellers air supply almost gone

Recs

4

September 21, 2008 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: MS , GS , C

A lot of conversation has followed about the Naked Short sellers into the markets. Nobody can explain the new oddly aggressive shorters. Their trades don't make sense. I would call them suicide short sellers. Some have suggested terrorism is behind the shorts. Some Russian hedge funds are speculated to be linked with Middle Eastern or Persian money. One hypothesis that has not been presented is that many small investors may be mindlessly shorting stocks through their brokerage houses from their terminals at home. That would be a frightening thought, millions of minnows tearing the flesh off a cow. In some ways this reminds me of the Caps game.

How to game the caps game is to be a suicide short seller. At the end of every rally, you climb onto your caps page and start listing companies to short. The common knowledge is that in down markets that at least 90% of rallies are met with a sell off. When does it stop? Well nobody knows that but when it stops it kills the suicide short seller and it kills them fast. If you look at our marvelous caps game, you will note that there has been some shifting of the top players down the ladder. Most of these players falling from grace, are the ones that have icons attached to their blogs of hooded images of Death with a cycle or some other evil druid symbolism. They are suicide short caps players.

The big question is whether we have had so many short sellers and such negative market sentiment that the market pattern will shift to one of a rally following every decline with moves to the upside. I can't predict that but I know one thing, there are a ton of shorts in the market that have not cleared, hoping for some down stroke to clear. They have been hurt so badly in the last two days, they are scared. Many of the radical shorting hedge funds will go broke.

I have implied that the suicide shorters have thrown fundamentals to the wind and are just shorting for short sake. This is irrational anti-exuberance. I think they are going to get destroyed in the financials and across the board. 

The stupidest example of shorting last week was Goldman Sachs. Why would I say this? The press clearly doesn't like the investment banker model. It wants a Bank linked to a Broker model. So the suicide shorts attacked Goldman and Morgan. Morgan quickly cried uncle and started talks with Wachovia. Goldman said essentially they would pass on the opportunity to own a bank. So the suicide shorts got their question answered with a Yes and a No. Both Goldman and Morgan stock price went up. Of course that makes no sense if you buy into the new saw that "every broker needs a bank" theory. Goldman should have gone down on short seller conviction alone.

We know the suicide short sellers are not very bright because they never looked at the underlying structure of Goldman. Goldman's float represents a mere 12% of the Goldman partnership. Thus, 88% of Goldman is not owned by shareholders. The book value of Goldman stock exceeds twice the current price. Goldman has assets in excess of 1.3 trillion dollars. The shorts are still sitting in this stock, hoping and praying for a sell off.

On a day like the last two, the short sellers were so busy trying to clear their shorts that they had to clear the emergency stocks first. By clamoring for Morgan to meet their model expectations, they accidentally triggered Wachovia and Washington Mutual to a massive rally and they had to get out of there which left a large number of shorts in Goldman and Morgan at market close. It is a disarray giving some credence to my minnows attacking a cow theory. This happened because they had more pressing matters; the shorts were getting the crap kicked out them. At the end of the first day rally, they shorted again only to be buried then next day. But now clearing suicide shorts out of Goldman and Morgan may be a problem. Especially since Morgan really don't seem to want to merge with a bank either. So now what?

The bailout plan calls for the treasury to purchase bad debt to be sold off by trading firms. It is actually a rather brilliant plan. The traders will manage the portfolios and eventually sell the assets. Some of this business will be going to Goldman, Morgan, and Merrill, and JPM. Further, banks will commence massive M&A activity. Goldman is about the only firm that cannot be imputed with a conflict of interest if Morgan merges with Wachovia. This will be a fast global M&A explosion in the banking and financial industry.

But the real big risk to shorts with Goldman is that Goldman has enough cash to buy up all of their stock float, every outstanding share and go private again. Goldman's current share price is very appealing at half book. Plus again the entire float represents just 12% of the ownership of the firm.

If you look in the new SEC rules there are now provisions for companies to buy back their stock. the new rules permit companies to buy back up to 100% of the average daily trading volume in their stock. So now instead of Goldman sitting quietly on their trading desk and watching the suicide shorts take liberties, Goldman can destroy them at will between bites of a hamburger and coke. That's a good NY hamburger, Kaiser roll, thick juicy, a slab of tomato, an onion... Best of all, the suicide shorts can't reload! They are sitting ducks.

We must remember that every short killed in the market is capital that floods into the market value. The shorts have done this to themselves. They compressed the markets by selling short the stock portfolios of all the financials in an effort to prevent the shorted banks from selling assets at fair market, trying to take the banks out of business. The strategy took out Indy Mac and has pile driven other financials. The problem is that the shorts were suicide shorters and shorted some very good well capitalized companies. Microsoft for example does not need to borrow money ever. They have 48 billion in cash. I am waiting for the naked shorts to attack Microsoft saying they don't like model unless the software giant buys a bank.

No matter which end of the market you trade on, when you lose sight of fundamentals you lose.

 

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On September 21, 2008 at 9:56 PM, russiangambit (30.00) wrote:

It is definitely not retail investors who shorted GS into oblivion. The shorting was way too massive. Also, I am guessing that 90% of retail investors don't even know how to short.

Report this comment
#2) On September 21, 2008 at 10:11 PM, abitare (99.46) wrote:

Lol, your CAPS portfolio is terrible!

"No matter which end of the market you trade on, when you lose sight of fundamentals you lose. "

Your portfolio nailed that one.  

Report this comment
#3) On September 21, 2008 at 10:31 PM, goldminingXpert (31.11) wrote:

ha. what a chump.

Report this comment
#4) On September 21, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Lordrobot (89.73) wrote:

The Caps gamers are coming at me. This is terrifying. It reminds me of going to eat at medieval times. The fact of the matter is that each of your little charts is in a nosedive, except for russingambit who has made some changes. But being good CAPs gamers you can go close out all of your short positions on sunday night and go long before the market opens. That is how valid your 99% scores are to me.

Any game that pretends to be an authentic market game has no purpose in allowing short and long positions backed by nothing. The game should start with a fixed amount of money, allow margin of 50% and allow short selling according to reality not according to some Caps clowns with knight icons, and scarey faces that remind me of Stephen King's fascination with clowns with razor blade teeth. It is absurd you can spend so much time out here wasting your lives. That is the definition of chump!

My whole purpose here is to stick hat pins in your eyes or throught holes in your little knight hats face. Like they say... Loserville... population you.

Report this comment
#5) On September 21, 2008 at 11:00 PM, nuf2bdangrus (< 20) wrote:

Interesting.  But rememgber, shorts have more to lose than longs do in the market.  And they add necessary liquidity.  Withouth shorts, the market loses air, which it desparately needs.  Taking shorts out is a setup for a crash.  Thus I can't get too long this market, except for a trade.

 

GS.  I bought at 90 and got stopped out at 87, just to see it rush up.  Shame on me.  I made up for some of the loss, but didn't hold overnight.  At least I had a double on WB, and I forgot to green thumb it!

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement