Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

lquadland10 (< 20)

Swine Flue. Give me the names of the makers. Down with the World Health Organazation.

Recs

4

October 20, 2009 – Comments (7)

Oh such eveil. Also may help explain Gulf War Syndrome I want to short them on general right and wrong.Oh those Yellowbellie Sapsuckers. Oh he double hocky sticks no on the Flue Shot. They better leave my Military Men ALONE. I can't see I am crying so hard.

 

http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/dr-russell-blaylock-vaccine-may-be-more-dangerous-than-swine-flu/

 

Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu What the good doctor say is true. Don’t be taken for a ride. So what if you catch this mild 3-4 days flu. It is even weaker than seasonal flu. We need to counter all the MSM propaganda BS that we should look to vaccines to save us! Dr Blaylock writes :
  
An outbreak of swine flu occurred in Mexico this spring that eventually affected 4,910 Mexican citizens and resulted in 85 deaths. By the time it spread to the United States, the virus caused only mild cases of flu-like illness.
 
Thanks to air travel and the failure of public health officials to control travel from Mexico, the virus spread worldwide. Despite predictions of massive numbers of deaths and the arrival of doomsday, the virus has remained a relatively mild disease, something we know happens each year with flu epidemics.
 
Worldwide, there have only been 311 deaths out of 70,893 cases of swine flu. In the United States, 27,717 cases have resulted in 127 deaths. Every death is a tragedy, but such a low death rate should not be the basis of a draconian government policy.
 
It is helpful to recall that the Centers for Disease Control with the collusion of the media, constantly tell us that 36,000 people die from the flu each year, a figure that has been shown to be a lie. In this case, we are talking about 300 plus deaths for the entire world.
 
This virus continues to be an enigma for virologists. In the April 30, 2009 issue of Nature, a virologist was quoted as saying,“Where the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know.” Extensive analysis of the virus found that it contained the original 1918 H1N1 flu virus, the avian flu virus (bird flu), and two new H3N2 virus genes from Eurasia. Debate continues over the possibility that swine flu is a genetically engineered virus.
 

Naturally, vaccine manufacturers have been in a competitive battle to produce the first vaccine. The main contenders have been Baxter Pharmaceuticals and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, the latter of which recently acquired the scandal-ridden Chiron vaccine company. Both of these companies have had agreements with the World Health Organization to produce a pandemic vaccine.
 
The Baxter vaccine, called Celvapan, has had fast track approval. It uses a new vero cell technology, which utilizes cultured cells from the African green monkey. This same animal tissue transmits a number of vaccine-contaminating viruses, including the HIV virus.
 

The Baxter company has been associated with two deadly scandals. The first event occurred in 2006 when hemophiliac components were contaminated with HIV virus and injected in tens of thousands of people, including thousands of children. Baxter continued to release the HIV contaminated vaccine even after the contamination was known.
 
The second event occurred recently when it was discovered that Baxter had released a seasonal flu vaccine containing the bird flu virus, which would have produced a real world pandemic, to 18 countries. Fortunately, astute lab workers in the Czech Republic discovered the deadly combination and blew the whistle before a worldwide disaster was unleashed.
 
Despite these two deadly events, WHO maintains an agreement with Baxter Pharmaceuticals to produce the world’s pandemic vaccine. Novartis, the second contender, also has an agreement with WHO for a pandemic vaccine. Novartis appears to have won the contract, since their vaccine is near completion. What is terrifying is that these pandemic vaccines contain ingredients, called immune adjuvants that a number of studies have shown cause devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.
 

Animal studies using this adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome.
 
So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. The Chiron company, maker of the deadly anthrax vaccine, makes an adjuvant called MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern—squalene and gp120. A number of studies have shown that squalene can trigger all of the above-mentioned autoimmune diseases when injected.
 
The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.
 
I reviewed a number of studies on this adjuvant and found something quite interesting. Several studies done on human test subjects found MF-59 to be a very safe immune adjuvant. But when I checked to see who did these studies, I found—to no surprise—that they were done by the Novartis Pharmaceutical Company and Chiron Pharmaceutical Company, which have merged. They were all published in “prestigious” medical journals. Also, to no surprise, a great number of studies done by independent laboratories and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases.
 

Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).
 
Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmune responses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolonged activation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type of prolonged activation has been strongly associated with such diseases as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and possibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation of the systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activates the brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation can persist for long periods.
 
So, how would the gp120 get into the brain?
Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination—these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.
 
It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations—everybody pays.
 
One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself—at least by conventional medicine. It will mean a lifetime of crippling illness and early death.
 
There are much safer ways to protect oneself from this flu virus, such as higher doses of vitamin D3, selective immune enhancement using supplements, and a good diet.
  See also :Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak
1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda and The Side Effects
Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Killed People!
Previous Swine Flu Outbreak Originated At Fort Dix!
Do Not Take A Swine Flu Vaccine!
Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries
Flashback: Homeless People Die After Bird Flu Vaccine Trial in Poland
Bayer Exposed (HIV Contaminated Vaccine)! 
Flu Pandemic Propaganda and Profit
Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests
1300 Girls Harmed by HPV Vaccines in UK; Bizarre Side Effects Like Paralysis and Epilepsy
US Marines Used As Lab Rats for Vaccines!
Doctor Questions Value of Vaccines
MMR Vaccine Injury

To be fair.

I cannot believe this is true!

Comment by gratis downloaden | July 19, 2009 | Reply

Of course you don’t believe it’s tzrue.
Because it isn’t.
MF59 does not contain GP120 !!!!
I wonder if there is any legal liability for persons like Mr. Russell B, who diseminate such false information.

Comment by Bernard | September 1, 2009 | Reply

Dear Bill, Hairless and Omega,
I did not miss the point.
I am aware of all the issues about the vaccine. However, there is no need to exagerate by introducing false claims.
The content of MF59C.1 is easibly accessible by a simple internet search.
OK, everyone can make a mistake.
And as long as it is a mistake, I don’t think anyone should be called upon for responsibility. So if it is a mistake, I take back my question on legal liability.
But there is still a matter of followers like you guys, who like to stick to such a claim even if the author of the text acknowledges he made a mistake.
And yes, I am a doctor, very much involved in vaccine testing, vaccine licencing and usage, so it was clear to me immediately that there is no gp120 in the adjuvant or in the flu vaccine.

Comment by Bernard | October 19, 2009

 

http://connectivetissue.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/many-physicians-are-opposing-swine-flu-vaccination/

 

7 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On October 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, lquadland10 (< 20) wrote:

[...] to take H1N1 vaccine from GSK Our Lives at Risk: Drug Company Greed and Dangerous Vaccines Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu David Icke: Don’t Take The A/H1N1 Vaccine! Belgium Health Minister passes law allowing use of [...]

Pingback by Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine III & Dr. Rima E. Laibow: Dangerous Vaccines, Corrupt Big Pharma, Eugenics Depopulation and the Coming Forced/Mandatory Vaccination! « Socio-Economics History Blog | July 20, 2009 | Reply

Permit me to add Dr. Veljko Veljkovic’s assessment of gp120, which is also added to most experimental HIV vaccines and other vaccines injected into our kids:
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews11-19.php
The culprit viral gene
The intended vaccines all contain gp120, a glycoprotein (protein decorated with side-chains of carbohydrates) belonging to the envelope of the human AIDS virus, HIV-1. The candidates include recombinant HIV proteins and peptides (subunit vaccines), HIV-1 or SIV (the monkey AIDS virus), killed or ‘attenuated’, ie, rendered harmless by successive passage in cultured cells, and a wide range of recombinant viral, bacterial and plasmid vectors expressing HIV proteins. (Plasmids are pieces of parasitic genetic material existing outside the cell’s genome, and are replicated by the cell independently of the cell’s genome.)

HIV researchers Dr. Veljko Veljkovic and his colleagues in Belgrade Yugoslavia, have shown that the gp120, is similar to the part of human immunoglobulin (antibody) proteins (Ig) involved in binding foreign antigens, a crucial step in the immune response. Thus, any AIDS vaccine containing the gp120 glycoprotein or the gene coding for it could strongly interfere with the immune system and make the host more vulnerable to the virus. And in the longer term, it could accelerate disease progression in HIV patients that do not yet have symptoms.

But the gp120 gene has other properties that pose an even greater threat to the vaccinated population. It contains ‘recombination hotspots’ similar to those in bacteria and viruses such as Haemophilus influenzae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus and herpes simplex virus, that often co-infect with the HIV, and also similar to recombination elements found in immunoglobulin genes and oncogenes (genes associated with cancer) in the human host. Recombination hotspots are breakpoints at which genetic exchange or recombination occurs much more frequently than usual. Recombination of HIV with bacteria and viruses would generate new pathogens. Within the human host, recombination with human genes would promote chromosomal rearrangements and formation of abnormal immuno-globulins, thus undermining immune responses. HIV-1 sequences integrated into the genome can act as retrotransposons (jumping genes) that can mutate genes by jumping into them, and some of the mutations may trigger cancer [1].

Dr. Veljkovic’s team, in collaboration with researchers in UK, Italy and US, have already found evidence of recombination between gp120 and a gene from Haemophilus influenzae [2]. Recombination between an HIV gene and Mycoplasm fermentans has been implicated in ‘Gulf war syndrome’ [3] affecting a high proportion of soldiers from the United States and the United Kingdom who served in the Gulf war. A new subtype of HIV-1 may also have resulted from recombination between HIV-1 and SIV [4].

The proponents of the AIDS vaccination trials argue that the desperate situation precipitated by the AIDS epidemic justifies acceptance of the ‘small risks’ involved. But Veljkovic and his colleagues have written a monograph documenting the lack of efficacy of the vaccines and the enormous risks involved [5].

Not effective and dangerous
In 1994, the AIDS Research Advisory Committee of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that phase III clinical trials of gp120 vaccines should not be conducted “at this time and in this country”. The reasons, according to Dr. A. Fauci, director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), were that the vaccines were ineffective; and there was a remote chance that the vaccines would compromise the immune system and make the recipient more vulnerable to infection [6].

The possibility that a vaccinated individual runs a greater risk of developing an established infection, or of progressing to disease more rapidly once infected, was confirmed subsequently [7]. The recombinant gp120 subunit vaccine tested in HIV-negative individuals was ineffective in protecting them against infection. Those who became infected during or after vaccination actually had in their blood sera significant levels of antibodies against the vaccine before they became infected, but those antibodies failed to protect them from infection. On the contrary, the vaccine appeared to have acted as a decoy to fool the immune system into mounting an attack on it, while allowing the HIV itself to slip through the host defence to get established. This subunit vaccine is due to go on Phase III clinical trial in Thailand.

Live recombinant viral and bacterial vaccines
The safety concerns for the individual are bad enough. But it is the effect on vulnerable populations that really worries Veljkovic and his colleagues, especially from the live recombinant viral and bacterial vector vaccines (see box).

Many viral and bacterial pathogens are being used as vectors, and a number are currently considered promising AIDS vaccines. But they are also promising candidates for generating new infectious agents.

Also refer to http://www.i-sis.org.uk/AVWTU.php

The gp120 protein is strongly immunogenic, which is why it is widely used in vaccines, in the hope that the body will produce antibodies against the protein and hence protect against the virus. But there have been many worrying signs that this may have just the opposite effect.

For although the body mounts a strong immune reaction against the protein, and produces antibodies against it, those antibodies fail to protect against the virus. One main reason is that the virus is very mutable, and can readily mutate to escape immune detection. In addition, the immune reaction mounted against the original gp120 undermines the effectiveness of the immune system by over-stimulating it, so that it is less effective to cope with new infections.

A recombinant gp120 vaccine tested in HIV-negative individuals in phaseI/II trails, was not effective in protecting against the disease. Not only that, participants in the trials had significant levels of circulating antibodies against the vaccine before they became infected, and came down with AIDS disease.

The vaccine could also be dangerous. A vaccine based on the gp120 from the strain SF2, actually suppressed the production of antibodies that could neutralise the later infecting virus, while boosting the production of useless antibodies that were specific for the vaccine strain, SF2. In other words, gp120 acts as a molecular decoy to disarm the body’s antiviral response, leaving it more vulnerable, and increasing the likelihood of rapid disease progression in those vaccinated that later became infected. This phenomenon is called “deceptive imprinting” of the immune system.

And he continues:
First of all, the part of the gp120 molecule that plays the dominant role in provoking an immune response is the V3 loop. The V3 loop and flanking regions are similar in base sequence and structure to the antigen-binding region of the human immunoglobulin (Ig) (antibody protein). And it has been proposed since the early 1990s that this immunoglobulin-like domain in gp120 may interfere with the immune regulatory network.
Another piece of evidence implicating genetic recombination is that the V3 loop and its flanking regions are located between recombination signals similar to those found in human immunoglobulins, and also similar to the Chi recombination hotpots found in many viruses and bacteria. Consequently, the immunologically dominant region of gp120 may be involved in recombining with human immunoglobulin genes resulting in autoimmune responses, and may also recombine with co-infecting viruses and bacteria to generate new pathogens. Evidence of such recombination has subsequently been found in the sera of AIDS patients.”

Let me add to that another danger, namely the viral promoters such as the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) used in genetic engineering and subsequently contained in GM feed and food.
” It is pertinent to point out that transgenic DNA in GM food and feed also carry recombination hotspots, such as the ones associated with the CaMV 35S promoter and the left and right borders of the Agrobacterium T-DNA used as vector to introduce transgenic DNA into the plant genome. These recombination hotspots enhance horizontal gene transfer and recombination. Furthermore, as Veljkovic said, the recombination hotspots in transgenic DNA may interact with the recombination signals flanking the V3 loop of the gp120 gene in AIDS vaccines to generate yet more exotic viruses.”

Ingrid Blank/South Africa

Comment by Ingrid Blank | July 22, 2009 | Reply

All that you wrote about gp120 here is completely irrelevant to the topic, because, influenza vaccines don’t contain gp120.
OK?
I am surprised how readily people put their trust into such claims whicdh have absolutely no credibility.

Comment by Bernard | September 1, 2009 | Reply

Well Bernard, you may indeed be correct; “MF59 does not contain GP120!!!!”
Can you supply us with a detailed list of the exact ingredients in the “MF59″ adjuvant?
Dr. Blaylock may have been eluding to an integral connection between gp120 and MF59…as they are typically found together, in a combined adjuvant, in an effort to boost immunogenicity and, vaccine efficacy.
It (gp120) is most definitely used to increase the efficacy of influenza vaccines…since 1984 and onward. This particular invention does typically consist of the gp120/MF59 combination.
Perhaps you, or others, may have heard of ISCOMs. “Immunostimulating Complex” or ISCOM; it is one adjuvant with multiple adjuvant properties. This invention is being used in several vaccine applications, e.g., HIV and Influenza (Iscom Matrix and influenza-ISCOMs).

Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 5, 2009

Dear Christopher-Peter,
The contents of MF59C.1 is easily accessible on the internet.
Just type MF59 into Google.
There is no integral connection between gp120 and MF59.
There was just one unsuccessful HIV vaccine candidate containing gp120 adjuvanted with MF59. No other vaccine contains gp120, neither has any contained it since 1984 onward. Yes,
I heard of ISCOM. It does not contain gp120.

Comment by Bernard | October 19, 2009

Report this comment
#2) On October 20, 2009 at 8:37 PM, kdakota630 (29.50) wrote:

I like Dr. Russell Blaylock.  Dr. W. C. Douglass is really good, too.

Report this comment
#3) On October 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM, hendrixtrader (< 20) wrote:

For future reference, if you want people to read your blog make it shorter. After the third ramble, I stopped caring

Report this comment
#4) On October 20, 2009 at 8:53 PM, lquadland10 (< 20) wrote:

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/mf59_h.html

http://www.ifpma.org/Influenza/index.aspx?46

so am I right on  squalene, a type of oil. being is also called GP120

Comment by gratis downloaden | July 19, 2009 | Reply

Of course you don’t believe it’s tzrue.
Because it isn’t.
MF59 does not contain GP120 !!!!
I wonder if there is any legal liability for persons like Mr. Russell B, who diseminate such false information.

Dear Bill, Hairless and Omega,
I did not miss the point.
I am aware of all the issues about the vaccine. However, there is no need to exagerate by introducing false claims.
The content of MF59C.1 is easibly accessible by a simple internet search.
OK, everyone can make a mistake.
And as long as it is a mistake, I don’t think anyone should be called upon for responsibility. So if it is a mistake, I take back my question on legal liability.
But there is still a matter of followers like you guys, who like to stick to such a claim even if the author of the text acknowledges he made a mistake.
And yes, I am a doctor, very much involved in vaccine testing, vaccine licencing and usage, so it was clear to me immediately that there is no gp120 in the adjuvant or in the flu vaccine.

So by my conclusions is it is in the vaccine.  Fromhttp://www.ifpma.org/Influenza/index.aspx?46

To enhance the breadth and intensity of the immune response mounted to the influenza virus proteins, various adjuvants and alternative immuno-potentiating agents have been evaluated for inclusion in the vaccine formulation. An adjuvant is typically a chemically inert substance that is able to modulate the immune response directed to a co-administered antigen. Recent licensed developments in the influenza vaccine field include MF-59, a submicron oil-in water emulsion, and virosomes, which present the influenza antigenic proteins on the surface of a phospholipids vesicle. Aluminum-containing adjuvants are also used by some manufacturers for prototype and pandemic influenza vaccines only.

 

Report this comment
#5) On October 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM, lquadland10 (< 20) wrote:

hendrixtraderFor future reference, if you want people to read your blog make it shorter. After the third ramble, I stopped caring. Well hendrixtrader. Your loss.

Report this comment
#6) On October 20, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Mary953 (80.87) wrote:

This makes me glad I've already had the d@#* swine flu.  My chance of getting it again have dropped by over 90%.  If you do end up with this thing (and it can have a low-grade fever, so the thermometer is not going to tell you) - Stay away from people, especially the very young and very old.  And for goodness sake, watch for signs that you are developing a secondary infection - sinus, ear, or especially a lung infection or pneumonia.  If you believe that you are, head for the doctor immediately.

Report this comment
#7) On October 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Slipswitch (< 20) wrote:

Is the Baxter H1N1 vaccine with H5N1 contamination true?  I have only seen it on blogs and cuckoo sites, but not on any mainstream sites. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement